Talk:The Distortion of Sound

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Crew[edit]

Is there any need to add the crew for the film because it seems really a short article. Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 10:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need for the crew to be put in this article. Only the cast listing will do. SKylar3214 2:37, 14 July 2014

Seems like an ad to me[edit]

I think some disclosure of Harmans' involvement should be noted in the article, and some critique of the film. A few samples are given in the film, but the wave forms look suspect to me. The amplitude is clipped, and the bit rate and format are never stated, seems like FUD to me, but I'll let someone less biased write that in the article.

Some of what the movie states is true, some is not. Compression is a tool, just like the SFX compression. The compression effect makes your audio sound bad if it isn't the tool you want. It makes is sound good if it's the tool you want. Digital compression is no different, even when used be careful of too much of a good thing. *All* of my equipment is Harman, but I'm leery of propaganda from anyone.

The movie directs you to the web site (http://www.distortionofsound.com/) which presents three solutions; Infinity Speakers, Clari Fi and Harman Research. The movie, site and solutions are owned, presented and/or copyrighted by Harman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.132.237.232 (talk) 16:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's pretty much an ad, you're right. It's intellectually dishonest, and most of the claims in it are framed poorly (making claims about HIGHLY compressed MP3s as if they apply to not only all MP3s, but all digital music whatsoever, etc.). 2601:4:BC0:235:F1A7:CBCC:499A:893B (talk) 05:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]