Talk:The Getaway Plan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV[edit]

The article, as it's written really sounds like an advertisement/press release. I don't really know enough about the band to rewrite with a more appropriate tone. Any takers? - The Bethling(Talk) 06:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I can, I just need to delete some sentences and rewrite them.JaVaR 07:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to edit all the advertisement/press realease material out, looks better, but not perfect.JaVaR 08:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further tidying and enhancement - I'm quite happy with the article's neutrality now (I put the first advertisement tag up). I propose removing the NPOV tag and replacing with a stub tag - any opposition? Ausref 01:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i updated the page with some info on a poster winner keep it up there or be known as a square —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.178.146.233 (talk) 09:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the stud tag, there's not much info on this page about them (JaVaR, on different pc and cant be bothered logging on) 58.165.30.34 09:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Band manager rape controversy[edit]

Why does the "rape controversy" section keep getting deleted? It should be included as it is relevant to the existance of the band. NEWSMAN 15:24, 8 April 2010

I agree that the part about the band's manager being convicted of 55 counts of paedophilia and rape offences in relation to his abusing his position in order to lure teen fans of the band is very relevant. It should be listed, now that he has been convicted. 218.214.132.162 (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with the above sentiments. Even though the band itself is in no way responsible for the criminal's actions, he was associated with them and abused his position to prey upon his victims. I will compose a new section to summarise the controversy.

If any editors disagree with the content I hope they will provide their reasons here before deleting all mention of it without appropriate consensus.Ulterior aurum (talk) 11:04, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:43, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]