Talk:The Girl in Lovers Lane

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Added analysis[edit]

Needs to be known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4000:62E0:415C:E582:A79E:5F19 (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorporation of plot summary from Fandom.com[edit]

I added a plot summary from the MST3K Fandom site, which was removed as "not from a reliable source". I intend to reinstate the content, so I wanted to explain my rationale further here.

The Fandom site is not a reliable source, but it is not being cited as one. The source for the plot summary is actually the work itself. Per MOS:FICTIONPLOT, it is not necessary to use secondary sources for objective facts from a primary source that can be verified by anyone with access to the work.

The attribution template is necessary because the text of the summary was adapted from the Fandom site, which is published under a CC BY-SA license; see WP:COPYOPEN. AnonQuixote (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]