Talk:The Giving of Orders

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Baileywelty.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bibliography[edit]

Tonn, Joan C. Mary P. Follett : Creating Democracy, Transforming Management. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003. eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 9 Mar. 2016.


Morse, Ricardo S.. “Prophet of Participation: Mary Parker Follett and Public Participation in Public Administration”. Administrative Theory & Praxis 28.1 (2006): 1–32. Web.


Morton, Noel O'R., and Stefanie A. Lindquist. "Revealing The Feminist In Mary Parker Follett." Administration & Society 29.3 (1997): 348. Business Source Complete. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.


Ferry, Diane L. "Dynamic Administration: The Collected Works Of Mary Parker Follett." Academy Of Management Review 11.2 (1986): 451-454. Business Source Complete. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.


Damart, Sébastien. "How Mary P. Follett's Ideas On Management Have Emerged an Analysis Based On Her Practical Management Experience And Her Political Philosophy." Journal Of Management History (1751-1348) 19.4 (2013): 459. Publisher Provided Full Text Searching File. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.

Bibliography[edit]

Barclay, Laurie J. "Following In The Footsteps Of Mary Parker Follett: Exploring How Insights From The Past Can Advance Organizational Justice Theory And Research." Management Decision 43.5 (2005): 740-760. PsycINFO. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.

Eylon, Dafna. "Understanding Empowerment And Resolving Its Paradox: Lessons From Mary Parker Follett." Journal Of Management History 4.1 (1998): 16. Supplemental Index. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.

Fry, Brian R., and Lotte L. Thomas. "Mary Parker Follett Assessing The Contribution And Impact Of Her Writings." Journal Of Management History 2.2 (1996): 11. Supplemental Index. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.

Mendenhall, ME, and WJ Marsh. "Voices From The Past: Mary Parker Follett And Joseph Smith On Collaborative Leadership." Journal Of Management Inquiry 19.4 (n.d.): 284-303. Social Sciences Citation Index. Web. 9 Mar. 2016.

Phillips, John R. "Scholarship And Public Service: The Life And Work Of Mary Parker Follett." Public Voices 11.2 (2010): 47-69.SocINDEX with Full Text. Web. 8 Mar. 2016. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acv22 (talkcontribs) 20:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

Fox, Elliot M. "Mary Parker Follett: The Enduring Contribution." Public Administration Review 28.6 (1968): 520. Colombia University. Web. 9 Mar. 2016

Follett, Mary Parker, and Pauline Graham. Prophet of Management: A Celebration of Writings from the 1920s. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School, 1995. Print.

Shafritz, Jay M., J. Steven. Ott, and Yong Suk. Jang. Classics of Organization Theory. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2005. Print.

Golembiewski, R. (1967). Men, management and morality. New York: McGraw Hill.

Mosher, F.C. (Ed.). (1975). American public administration: Past, present and future. University, AL: University of Alabama Press. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jules214 (talkcontribs) 21:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

Erzinger,T. (1995). Internal communications in a public library. The Australian Library Journal, 44(4), 239-248.

Hopen, D. (2010). The changing role and practices of successful leaders. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 33(1), 4-9.

Massie, Cynthia Zeliff. “Teaching Introduction to Public Administration via the Case Method”. Journal of Public Administration Education 1.2 (1995): 102–115.

Reinke, S. J. (2004). SERVICE BEFORE SELF: TOWARDS A THEORY OF SERVANT-LEADERSHIP. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 5(3), 30-57.

Schilling, M. A. (2000). Decades ahead of her time: Advancing stakeholder theory through the ideas of mary parker follett. Journal of Management History, 6(5), 224-242.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Baileywelty (talkcontribs) 21:01, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Feed Back[edit]

The article is well informed and summarised. Maybe add more to the context section and add a "See also" section. Its pretty good since its just about an essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidTorresII (talkcontribs) 20:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]