Talk:The Greens (Luxembourg)

Luxembourg High‑importance

	Luxembourg portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Luxembourg, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LuxembourgWikipedia:WikiProject LuxembourgTemplate:WikiProject LuxembourgLuxembourg articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

planning to add some more in the coming days[edit]

I will try and add some more detail to the current state of the Green party in the coming days. One of the likely additions is to give as much detail for Esch-Alzette then is currently provided for Luxembourg. I'll also try to look up the other commune's in which the Greens are participating in coalitions. Another note, in addition to representation in Proporz (proportional election) communes, there are also members of the Green Party in Majorz (majority elections) communes, it is highly likely that these include one or more mayors and deputy mayors (Henry Kox for instance should become mayor of Remich in a year or two according to a coalition agreement there). If I can find that data I will add it as well.--Caranorn 15:03, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leader[edit]

For the purposes of the infobox, one has to pigeonhole a single individual as the 'leader', yet Déi Gréng aren't quite as straight-forward in this respect. François Bausch is the leader of the parliamentary party, but holds no special position on the party's executive (he merely represents the party's deputies). Would there be another option? Bastin 00:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

You can list him as leader, especially if he is the one the media first turn to for questions. C mon 06:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative would be to list the two speakers of the party (not sure who that is right now). Listing whomever the media contacts first is not always a good indicator. Though in this case I can confirm that Bausch still pulls the strings in the party.--Caranorn 10:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Greens (Luxembourg) logo.PNG[edit]

Image:The Greens (Luxembourg) logo.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Lesser coat of arms of Luxembourg.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]