Talk:The Hungry Earth/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Puffin (talk · contribs) 21:37, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	1 Dablink (Over the Rainbow) please fix it. You need a non breaking space between numbers and measurements (for example, you say: 21 kilometres in the Plot section and there are a few more in other sections) or use {{convert}}.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Ref 4 - Needs publishing date
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	It would be nice to see some citations in the infobox.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	The article is very good but just fix these minor issues and it will pass. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I have fixed the dablink and added {{convert}} to the 21 kilometers, but I do not know what you mean by "non-breaking spaces". Ref #4 does not give a publishing date. Glimmer721 ^talk 17:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Put   between the numbers and measurements. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 19:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this for the instances of [Number] million; I do not believe there are any other measurements in the article. If there are, please tell me. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]