Talk:The Man Who Was Sherlock Holmes

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the German cinema task force.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media franchises: Sherlock Holmes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sherlock Holmes (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

One thing stands out about this movie in my mind,and that is that "Holmes" is not dressed in his famous attire (deerstalker cap, Inverness cloak, meerschaum pipe, first used by William Gillette in the famous play SHERLOCK HOLMES), although the dialog says that he is. In fact, he's wearing a large round checked hat, a coat with crisscross stripes, and is using a small black pipe. These are used as substitutes - and very poor substitutes at that - for the famous attire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glammazon (talk • contribs) 03:50, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]