Talk:The Riddle (Nik Kershaw song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging/Separation of song articles[edit]

Please note : There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your feelings on the matter. Regards. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think they should be merged.--JimJam707 (talk) 16:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they should be merged.-- Sarah. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.252.148 (talk) 10:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be best to first determine whether merging articles regarding cover versions of songs with articles regarding the original versions of songs is the customary practice on Wikipedia. If so, I vote to merge. If not, I vote not to merge.Pygmypony (talk) 19:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nik-Kershaw-The-Riddle.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Nik-Kershaw-The-Riddle.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Novelty song"[edit]

I removed the "novelty song" category, since there's absolutely no indication in the article anywhere why this (or any of the covers) should be considered what WP itself describes as "built upon some form of novel concept, such as a gimmick, a piece of humor, or a sample of popular culture". The lyrics are opaque/meaningless, but that hardly qualifies as a novelty. It would be interesting if this was the first ever song where the author admitted the words had no intended meaning, but I doubt it can claim that honor. Genres are always a matter of some subjectivity, but I think this one would need a source. 82.95.254.249 (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:26, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]