Talk:The Siege of the North

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Day and Night[edit]

Yeah, since they're in the north pole, shouldn't it be like 6 months of daytime and 6 months of nighttime? I mean you actually see the sunrise, when Zuko get powerful again, but the sunrise should take at least a month in the north pole. Besides, a year would have passed from night, day, then night or viceversa. Slartibartfast1992 16:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on, let me call up the creators. H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 19:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really asking for sarcasm. Just pointing it out. And besides I was just asking if there could be some point in the north pole where there's actually normal night and day, okay?.Slartibartfast1992 18:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How would we know this? How? Reason 1: Their sun is larger. Reason 2: Their planet doesn't tilt on an axis. Reason 3: Their planet is oval shaped. There are millions of things it could be that we don't know. The Avatar world is not our world. Humans can shoot fire our of their feet, whats to think the rest of the world follows our exact knowledge of physics? H2P (Yell at me for what I've done) 22:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. Good point about the sun being larger, I guess that's a good explanation. Though I was just asking if, in the real world, there's any place in the north pole where there could be night and day as normal (and compare it to where, in the north pole, they would be in "The Siege of the North" and "The Waterbending Master").Slartibartfast1992 19:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of the North article for battle[edit]

Hey, how about putting up an article for the battle of Siege of the North. That would be pretty cool.

You mean like the one you (Jimblack) made that got deleted? No thanks.--Fyre2387 (talkcontribs) 21:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Koh with Aang1623.jpg[edit]

Image:Koh with Aang1623.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]