Talk:The Slipper and the Rose

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Musical Theatre

The Slipper and the Rose is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre articles

On 17 July 2019, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Slipper and the Rose to The Slipper and the Rose: The Story of Cinderella. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Critical response[edit]

Writing in The New York Times, critic Vincent Canby called the film "harmless", adding that the writers "stretched the fable without mercy, largely to accommodate a whole bunch of forgettable songs by the Shermans", and that, as the Prince and Cinderella, "Mr. Chamberlain and Miss Craven have impossible roles that are less like characters in a fairy tale than pictures on a jar of peanut butter." Vincent Canby - "Screen: Glass Slipper Into Sow's Ear", The New York Times, November 5, 1976. Retrieved December 1, 2006

The above POV comment has been moved to the talk page because the linked page is not available to unregistered readers of the newspaper. Figaro 19:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the passage to the article (adding the notation that it does require registration). Drawing on response from critics is appropriate and does not violate NPOV. Excluding a citation because it comes from a limited-access site is like saying that citations from books are not allowable because not every editor or reader has access to every book. Based on the half-dozen or so reviews I have seen, Canby's critique is representative, and he was at the time of the film's release a major presence in film criticism. Robertissimo 02:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Songs - merge proposal[edit]

An article as been created for each song in the story - but I think as these are doom to be stub sized articles forever they should be merged into the main article and redirects left. Any opinions? Madmedea 11:26, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The-Slipper-and-the-Rose-CD.jpg[edit]

Image:The-Slipper-and-the-Rose-CD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 02:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The-Slipper-and-the-Rose-DVD.jpg[edit]

Image:The-Slipper-and-the-Rose-DVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Credit[edit]

I was trying to add to the little box on the right that the costumes were done by Jean Hunnisett (a well-noted historical costumer whose "Patterns of History" are pretty much textbooks for any serious historical costumer), & I have not been able to do so. Help...?FlaviaR (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Credit also due to Angela Morley as musical arranger and conductor, Marc Breaux as choreographer, David Frost was executive producer, Naim Attallah and John Asprey as production co-ordinators. Running time 146 minutes. Rating: Universal and fit for General viewing. So says my Daily Mail DVD. Stuffed cat (talk) 23:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 July 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. See general agreement below to keep the subtitle out of the article title. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 15:00, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was proposed in this section that The Slipper and the Rose be renamed and moved to The Slipper and the Rose: The Story of Cinderella.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

The Slipper and the Rose → The Slipper and the Rose: The Story of Cinderella — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.210.186 (talk) 17:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisted. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 20:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relist note: members of WikiProjects with banners on this page have been notified of this request. Paine Ellsworth, ed. ^put'r there 21:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. The full title appears on film posters as well as in the on-screen opening credits. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SUBTITLE. RS mostly refer to it as just "The Slipper and the Rose", without the subtitle. (At least based on quickly checking the Telegraph obituary linked in the article, and the first 3 articles that came up when I searched nytimes.com for "The Slipper and the Rose".) Colin M (talk) 03:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Very well-known film by its primary title. Subtitle is completely unnecessary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:SUBTITLE and name used in sources. -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:11, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose also per WP:COMMONNAME. This is analagous to the situation at the Dr Strangelove article and at least I knew that subtitle. MarnetteD|Talk 21:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.