Talk:The Sweetest Thing

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.cinema.com/articles/855/sweetest-thing-the-production-notes.phtml The Sweetest Thing - Production Notes from Columbia Pictures

Untitled[edit]

"Throughout the movie, Burns is put through a string of embarrassing moments, which include a scene at the dry cleaners and also one where she is caught in the act." What act? 86.142.150.212 14:27, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oral sex (190.12.156.120 (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:The Sweetest Thing poster 02.jpg[edit]

Image:The Sweetest Thing poster 02.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barely profitable?[edit]

Is "barely profitable" the appropriate description? If I invested a lump sum for a couple of years and got a 156% return, I'd be pretty happy about it. 121.44.183.219 (talk) 22:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

$43 million[edit]

I've seen this movie. Can someone tell me what they spent $43 million on??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I remember the film getting quite hyped by young feminist journalists and media rookies in Sweden, as a "girlpower flick". ;) 83.254.129.237 (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on The Sweetest Thing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://tvplex.go.com/buenavista/ebertandroeper/030120.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}). This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where is Somerset?[edit]

Is the Somerset named in the plot the English county or a namesake place in the US? I am hesitant to article link the name.Cloptonson (talk) 22:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– No indication that The Sweetest Thing (film) is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC over The Sweetest Thing (song). If this nomination succeeds, The Sweetest Thing can become the main title header of the Sweetest Thing (disambiguation) page, thus obviating the need for the parenthetical qualifier "(disambiguation)". —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Pageviews analysis here shows the film comfortably in the lead. Why change anything? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 02:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To add on, the "all time" parameter shows 979,287 views across the three articles with a daily average of 473. Dropping the film, the two remaining articles have 67,379 views with a daily average of 33. That means the film takes up 93% of the views. Doesn't seem necessary to change anything. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 02:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose based on the pageviews analysis provided by Erik. —El Millo (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Longer term pageviews are consistent with those stated above and do indicate a primary topic by usage. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my above numbers. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extra cast[edit]

Frank Grillo as Andy
Eddie McClintock as Michael
Lillian Adams as Aunt Frida
James Mangold as Dr. Greg
Johnny Messner as Todd
Georgia Engel as Vera
Johnathon Schaech as Leather Coat Guy (uncredited)
Love Jones as Wedding Band
Mitch Mullany as Craig