Talk:The World According to Monsanto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featuring (section)[edit]

This section is a big waste of whitespace. I would suggest folding the few notable/linked names into the article text instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.193.91.236 (talk) 22:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I rolled it up into three columns to banish the whitespace while maintaining the information. — O'Dea (talk) 12:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality problem[edit]

It's important to reflect what reliable sources say, instead of taking The World According to Monsanto's claims at face value. So why do edits like this keep on happening? bobrayner (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to old post, it isn't the job of a synopsis to validate the truth or otherwise of claims made in a film, only to validate the presence of those claims in the film. Criticism or linking to other articles is how 'the bigger picture' is presented. Pincrete (talk) 09:49, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Awards[edit]

Either the book, or the film appear to have won a Norwegian environmental award, and an Icelandic award, although this article and the Marie-Monique Robin article contradict each other as to which it was.Pincrete (talk) 09:45, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The World According to Monsanto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]