Talk:The ZhuZhus/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 19:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I'll look this one over and write up a review. Sagecandor (talk) 19:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination[edit]
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 13, 2017, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Unfortunately, this one just isn't up to snuff yet. The lede fails WP:LEAD, at four sentences long, it does not adequately summarize the entire article's contents. The plot section fails MOS:FICT, at one sentence long, it doesn't adequately summarize the story of the show.
- 2. Verifiable?: Some characters are cited, some are uncited. Production needs a cite for info at the end of it. Broadcast needs a cite for info at the end of it.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Two sources in Reception is a bit skimpy. Production could be expanded. Plot can be expanded. The lede can be expanded.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Difficult to assess as we need a lot more expansion and research.
- 5. Stable?: Article is stable.
- 6. Images?: File:The ZhuZhus logo.png fails. Missing info on field, author or copyright holder.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— Sagecandor (talk) 00:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)