This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
I know this will be HEAVILY patrolled by Huffington Post employees and it may never be possible to accurately represent this, but Thrive Global was originally pitched almost as a religious cult, it sounded very much like Scientology. Even far left media bias websites like https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/thrive-global/ list this as strongly biased and a 'left wing conspiracy'. You know when everyone, left right and centre, list it as a whacky cult there's something afoot given that even things like NVXIUM weren't considered as bad as Thrive is. But how do you go about realistically addressing this when a megacorp owns this company and has more employees to astroturf and defend their weird religion? Because this is so NPOV it wouldn't be surprising if it's literally written by a PR agency at this point. But there's no point in me making an account and trying to make it less biased because it'll just get insta-reverted. What can be done? 2001:8003:3647:C000:5974:8102:7075:2238 (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah for sure. When the founder of this company wrote a negative post on Linkedin about Elon Musk and his "failure" of managing Twitter only three weeks after his purchasing the company, I knew this was a crock. The very last place on earth for sensationalist political bashing is LinkedIn. I was surprised to see someone of such high regard dribble mainstream far-left rhetoric, on a platform designed specifically against it. I wonder what will ultimately come of such a firm which possesses a leader that has lost all sense of professionalism, enough so to drag the muddy boots of social media tribalism into the heart of the bastion of professional networking that is Linkedin. 72.223.114.171 (talk) 21:41, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
