Talk:Titan Rain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This is a hot news item that no doubt will be further reported on in coming weeks. I think it should remain.

Good call. Check out the front page of the Washington Times online today, and you will see more stories about Titan Rain. --Chitown2pa

Mil-Stub[edit]

All reputable research into the subject indicates that these attacks originate from within the Chinese military and are aimed at the networks of defense contractors and the U.S. military. Thus, I'm mil-stubbing the article. Tzaquiel 18:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What reputable research? The only "source" of information right now are from the main stream media which know as much about this issue as you or me. You can't blame someone until you have proof or it's just fear mongering and sensationalistic headlines. I have modified the article to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.16.170 (talk) 20:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The attacks are believed to be the result of actions by People's Liberation Army Unit 61398. [3]

Adding on User:Tzaquiel point: 'believed' by whom? The ref[3] only links to a webpage introducing Unit 61398 (which has been already referenced to the wiki page), instead of any supporting evidence. The only piece of information I can direct to is a Twitter page. Not solid enough in my opinion. -- by by July 19, 2020

January 2015 pruning[edit]

Given the writing style and lack of inline sourcing, my guess is that there was a high school assignment to expand this article. I've removed most of that material. The article should be expanded, but with better writing and proper sourcing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:11, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Titan Rain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]