Talk:Tokio Hotel/Archive 1

Other Things

I've yet to find a solid source on the information that, according to stats released very revently, the number one term googled in Belgium is "Tokio Hotel"; when someone does, should it be included in the article? I believe it should be, as it shows the extent of the band's popularity. Also, I know that the issue of the Kaulitz twins having their own article has been brought up many times before, but I'd like to further argue that it should be done; for example, last year a popular German TV show named Bill as the #1 most annoying German of 2006, and a couple of nights ago he was crowned #2. And really, there have been so many News spots on German TV about Tom buying a CAR, for goodness' sake. The popularity of the Kaulitz twins not only in their motherland but in many other places around the world is comparable to other super stars such as Justin Timberlake. Think about it. Also noteworthy is German late-night show Freitag Nacht News having a regular skit called "Tokyo Motel" that parodies Bill Kaulitz.

Back on the subject of the Tokio Hotel article itself, it should also be noteworthy that the band donates a designated portion of their profit to a certain charity (I forgot which one, though...). Can someone find a source? Bitteniewieder (talk) 08:00, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

It would be very hard to verify and seems rather trivial. It would be original research to suggest that number of hits on a search engine = popularity. I highly doubt it will turn out to be true. If you look at the most searched terms over the past 10 years, musical acts rarely register highly, i see no reason that Belgium should be any different. WP:BIO specifies that a person must have been the subject of several none trivial second party publications. As this is the english wikipedia i'm not sure whether their notability in Germany is relavant. If it is titled "Tokyo Motel" then that suggests it is linked to the band not the individuals. Remember we are looking for notability which is not linked the band. --neonwhite user page talk 18:57, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

How about putting up a different picture. The red background draws attention, but the picture, otherwise, is blurry. Plus only part of Tokio Hotel is even in it. There needs to be a GOOD picture with everyone in there. A few more pics scattered throughout the article wouldn't be bad either. (Anonymous1)

Of course, the one currently being used completely "sucks". If it is to be replaced though, it must be of public domain. I think, I'm not for sure on how legal this site is. It's not a copyright killer like YouTube.com, right? I probably should read the rules. Ay, I'm getting off subject? Yah, this is not an IM.

Forums

May I remind everyone that the discussion page is not a forum for the topic, but a discussion about what should or shouldn't be added/deleted from the article? Read the rules people.Gopherbassist 01:23, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

For user 81.233.2.176

Where are you getting the sales numbers "+600,000 for Schrei and +563,000 for Zimmer 483"? I had included a source of reference previously redirecting to their Bio within their official web site. You still have that the same source (that one says 3 million CDs and DVDs in Germany). You should change the source or if you don't know how to do it just leave the web site here in discussion and I'll change it.--Harout72 04:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC) TOM KAULITZ IS SO HOT!

The links

I suggest to keep the link to official band-sites and remove links to the fanclubs or street team-sites/pages. Syrion 16:19, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal

(This refers to merging Bill and Tom Kaulitz into Tokio Hotel --BNutzer (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC))

Any objections. I think the lack of notability here speaks for itself. --Neon white 15:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I think the Kaulitz twins are far more popular, well-known and recognisable than the band itself particularly outside of the countries in which Tokio Hotel's releases have been big successes, e.g. UK, USA. Living in the UK myself, I was aware of Tom and Bill Kaulitz ever since I read an article about Tokio Hotel in the London Metro; I didn't recall the band as a whole at all, their single failed to chart here, but they were interviewed and featured independently as the Kaulitz twins. They have been involved in more exploits than just Tokio Hotel, e.g. Arthur and the Invisibles, the Gibson guitar endorsement deals, and more I can't even remember at the mo'. However their popularity in other countries is due largely to their distinct images, particularly Bill's, in terms of style and in general. He has also become a fad/forced-meme on various imageboards and forums, including 4chan. I do think that the article on the Kaulitz twins needs to be expanded with more information, though. There is some available I'm just way too lazy to gather all the sources etc. I'll do it soon and then others can tell me whether they think the addition of all the extra information further merits a seperate article.

I think the twins are far more well-known than say, members of the Rasmus, who each have their own individual articles. I think it would be more logical to merge less-known bands where the artists in them have seperate articles, unless they have other side-projects etc.

-Impamiizgraa 22:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

I don't think they are very notable outside of the band, therefore most people looking for info would arrive at this page. If you are correct and there is notability seperate from the band, then their article should reflect that, at the moment 90% of it repeats info that is on this page. Appearances on imageboards isnt really that notable to be honest. There are certainly no sources for that. The Arthur and the Invisibles and Gibson things could easily be said to be linked to the band. The usual step is to merge them and then unmerge should there be more significant text written about them. We can't make the decision based on what other bands have. --Neon white 15:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

A merge would be the best thing to do for now. We can remake the twins article again but with sources asserting notabilty outside of the band. There's no point having an individual article on each member if all of the information can be found on the band article. AngelOfSadness talk 17:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Ok. I remember they acted in a German film as toddlers, Verruckt Nacht Die in 1994, then there is the Arthur and the Invisibles, then there is Tom's Gibson guitar deals. I can assure you their notability as individuals extends further than their recognition as just the singer and the guitarist of Tokio Hotel. The extra projects I've listed is also reason enough, in my opinion to keep their article seperate, and considering the trend of their current successes and ventures into USA/UK in the future, I think we'll end up creating the article again, so why bother taking it down in the first place with all this extra information (that I will, so help me god, I will find time to edit). Impamiizgraa 00:03, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Your assurance isn't really encyclopedic. i think that the Arthur and the Invisibles and Gibson deals aren't linked to the band rather than as individuals outside of the band. If you can add the film then it might give the article a little extra notability but it's still a little light. Whether it is created again in the future has no part in the decision. articles should not be written based on speculation that the topic may receive additional coverage in the future.. See WP:N and WP:NOT#CBALL --Neon white 00:51, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

#REDIRECT [[Tokio Hotel]]--Dave it (talk) 09:06, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

That leaves Talk:Bill and Tom Kaulitz orphaned. BNutzer (talk) 11:39, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The page hasn't been deleted it just redirects here because any required info about them is likely to be related to the band and therefore can be found here. --Neon white 18:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

The content of that Kaulitz page hasn't been merged yet. Im reverting. WP:BOLD Patcat88 (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

That was because most of it was unsourced. --Neon white (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

No speculation but verifiable facts only!!!!

Please keep in mind: an encyclopedia is just to state facts and not unsourced, speculative material. And please refrain from adding your own point of view. This is highly un-encyclopedic.
--Fromgermany (talk) 16:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

LISTEN People, its me, who is constantly deleting "glam rock" from TOKIO MOTEL article. I'm being accused of vandalism, but the only thing i'm doing, is not lettting "glam rock" into this article. You cant call TH glam rock, just because one of those *** said that they play GLAM ROCK. If i say that im a king, am i a king? Calling TOkio hotel glam rock, is offensing bands like SLADE or KISS. Think about it for a while!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.14.90.50 (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

If you continue to vandalise the article you will be block from editing it. Genres are not perjorative, they are of no point of view, they are merely a categorisation of popular music. --Neon white (talk) 01:43, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

But one should keep in mind that there are tons of sources saying they are glam rock and the band consider themselves glam rock. Both of these are good enough reasons to have glam rock in the infobox. The band have also been said to have smidgens of punk rock and more importantly Visual kei and it happens that both of these genres are derivative forms of glam rock AngelOfSadness talk 19:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for stating this so clearly. Sadly I guess this won't convince the IP. --Fromgermany (talk) 00:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

In the glam rock article there is no mention about TH being glam rock. They are also not listed in the list of glam rock bands. All music guide doesn't say that they are glam rock. The fact is that they are not a glam band, but they are alternative rock band. JNCooper —Preceding comment was added at 09:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

They are cited as a glam rock band, what is not contained in other wikipedia article is not a reliable source. All this says is that they should be in those articles. Similarily a website failing to saying they are is not source, allmusicguide is only one questionable source and is certainly not the absolute source for genres. --neonwhite user page talk 20:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Everyone here saying TH are a glam rock band simply have no idea what glam rock sounds like. Your "sources" are no better than any random google hit (btw try googling for Tokio Hotel and glam rock). Show me one critic or musician other than TH themselves that name them glam rock and I'll shut up (I seriously doubt they could name one glam artist themselves, but that's another matter). But as for now glam rock will be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.22.8.97 (talk) 22:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The source is mtv, it is a verifiable source. Any more deleting of content will likely result in a ban. Your personal opinions are of no interest to this article. --neonwhite user page talk 16:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

First of all this isn't your playground were you can show everyone who is the boss. Secondly your personal opinions has just as much interest and vality as those of everybody else, namely none. And lastly some mtv news board was never considered a reliable (I think that's the word you mean) source, even less if it is in Italian, no offense, but if no German or English site consider a German band Glam Rock, the band simply isn't. I googled for Tokio Hotel and Glam Rock, and the first 20 hits were from either non-English or non-German speaking sites (same issue as with the Italian mtv page), this page and a few sites where TH and Glam Rock had been incoherently found. If you continue adding Glam Rock as a genre without a reliable proof (forget verifiable, anything found on the internet is verifiable, reliability is what's important) and threaten other users you might as well be banned for violating etiquette. Why is this issue so important to you anyway? Nobody aside from yourself said they were Glam Rock, and you do not own this page, more less this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 19:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia decides it's content on the basis of verifiability. I suggest you read the policy and guidelines carefully before making any future edits. The sources provided are perfectly verifiable, the language of sources does not change that. This has been decide by a consensus of editors based on the multitude of sources listed above. I highly recommend reading how to edit in a civil manner. --neonwhite user page talk 19:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Read them yourself, it states that verifiable means that you should be able to check the information from a reliable source, which you can't. You are the one threatening people, so stay civil yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 19:32, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Mtv is a relaible source according to all policy. I have made no personal threats. --neonwhite user page talk 19:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Okay I can understand a certain bullheaded indivudual considers mtv word law. Do yourself a favour and listen to a real Glam rock artist. Your childish behavior can only mean that you are an immature kid that can't face the fact that he likes pop music. Do not see this as an insult, it is more a promt to prove me wrong. I will refrain from editing, but promise me to listen to a real Glam rock artist and compare their music to TH. You will realise you (and mtv) are wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 15:40, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Mtv is a verifiable sources according to wikipedia policy. As pointed out personal opinions do not matter. --neonwhite user page talk 18:35, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Oh please just shut up. Mtv never was a reliable source, according to any policy (I checked). Read the policy yourself, and have a dictionary at hand because you obviously haven't understood enough to be an objective and unbiased editor. No German site ever sayed they were glam rock, and I doubt you speak German any way, so why do you have the authority? This whole glam rock junk is your personal opinion anyway, which is just as out of place as anybody elses. If you had read your so "reliable" source, you would have see that TH call themselves glam rock. So if they call themselves techno or heavy metal or rap are they techno, heavy metal or rap? Don't you dare send me any quotas from wiki-policy again without reading them yourself and drop that holier-than-though attitude. You never even made the attempt to understand anyone elses arguments or point of view, which is disgustingly selfish and intolerant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 22:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Mtv is the biggest music channel in the world, it is known to be WP:V for music facts. As has been pointed out early, we don't prove negatives, it doesn't matter where it hasnt been said just that relaible sources say it and the consensus here was to keep it. You do not have any valid arguement only a personal view which is not relevant and not wanted on this article. You are on your final warning. --neonwhite user page talk 00:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't think you ever read WP:V, because you would know that any "source" found on the internet is verifiable. If the source is only found on the internet it needs to be reliable. And according to WP:V a (Italian) mtv news board isn't reliable, and it sure isn't verifiable to the public reading the English TH wikipage. Find an English source or at least a German one, else contibute to the Italian or French page. I haven't seen you submit pop-punk or alternative rock as genre (again check AMG). So the only reason for your persistent misinformation must be a personal one, as you don't go on submitting any genre found by some site you label "verifiable". Ban me for all I care, it doesn't excuse your behavior or make your contibution any more true. I had and still have valid arguments (btw nice spelling) and you either never understood them or you simply ignored them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 10:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

To quote WP:V Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. MTV is considered verifiable as a source and has been used in many articles. WP:V at no point mentions specific sites. Sources do not have to be in english. I have not seen any articles that say pop-punk or alternative rock, it is not up to be to add those. Please read the policy. It is galringly obviously you have not. --neonwhite user page talk 17:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Neonwhite, you're so damn wrong here, but you just won't admit it. Let's vote about Tokio Hotel being glam rock. I'm saying that they are not a glam band. If MTV says so, that is the only website on internet that has that opinion and it's wrong. Slade, T.Rex, Alice Cooper and Sweet were glam rock. What same does TH have in their music as those bands? Nothing! They are not glam rock and that's a fact you ignorant little child. Everyone who knows something about the history of rock will say that Tokio Hotel is not glam rock. Maybe neo-glam or post-glam, but NOT glam rock! ---JNCooper 19:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Your personal views are not relevant here. There are multiple reliable sources here. You are not one of them. Please read WP:CIVIL on how to discuss matters in a civil way. --neonwhite user page talk 19:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I have no knowledge in whether Tokio Hotel should be classed as Glam Rock or not. But trying to read this discussion neonwhite is actually trying to discuss this matter in a civilised manner (irregarding if he's right or not), which most of you others don't, if you would like to make your point believable try not to call people "ignorant little child". Please at least try to read WP:CIVIL before insulting people again. If I still would try to add my own opinion in the matter I would disagree with Tokio Hotel being called Glam Rock, though I don't really know if italian MTV should be classed as a verifiable source or not. And there is no way to argument against neonwhite if you have no real arguments against the use of these sites as sources. My opinion on that matter will remain neutral. --Qszet (talk) 21:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I can't find any reason why mtv should not be considered reliable, it's the biggest music channel in the world, it has a distinct history. What we have to remember is that wikipedia represents verified info not facts. All genres are subjective and the infobox merely reflects a number of genres that a band is known as. Regardless of personal views. --neonwhite user page talk 03:48, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Mtv is not reliable (and gratz you finally realisd that it has to be reliable and not verfiable) because it has no aspiration whatsoever to describe, analyse and categorise music. It is just the homepage of a tv-network, which originally did nothing but distribute music videos. You will never find critics or reviews on mtv. For instance mtv.de (Germany) once described avril lavigne as punk rock, HIM as love metal (for the record it isn't even a genre), dimmu borgir as shock-rock, cradle of filth as black metal, little richard as rock, etc. Now I can't say wether mtv.it is any better, but considering that the majority of wikipedias users do not speak Italian, mtv.it is not verifiable anyway. Face it, mtv will say anything that goes well with the targeted audience (and you might be the best example that the practice works). It is not a personal opinion (an opinion would be Tokio Hotel sucks/rules or is pop-rock, alternative rock, pop etc), but an irrefutable fact, Tokio Hotel is simply not glam rock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 15:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

On what ridiculous grounds do you suspect mtv the biggest and most well known music channel in the world to not be reliable? verifiablity is the standard that all sources must adhere to. MTV publishes many article and reviews, many of which are used as sources in countless articles. If you wish to discuss changes in WP:V policy then do it on that page. Genres are define by the media. Language of a source is irrelevant to it's verifiable. Please cease pushing your absurd personal POV beyond all reason. I remind you that wikipedia is not based on your view but on that of verifiable sources which includes the media whether you agree with them or not has no bearing on it and does not allow a source to be discarded. --neonwhite user page talk 18:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Upps, don't you lose your cool. First of all, mtv is not the biggest music channel in the world unless you give me a source:). Secondly, language is important, or what would you do, if I show you a, say, (reliable) Russian site, stating that Tokio Hotel isn't glam rock (couldn't verify that now, could you). Thirdly, mtv never published reviews, the closest thing that gets to a review is perhaps a notice containing information about succesful a record sells, or how much the kids love 'em and mtv-news is just as reliable as The Sun, Bildzeitung and The National Enquirer. To my understanding (my Italian is quite limited, but nevertheless I tried to translate it) your source isn't talking about the music anyway. Wikipedia has the aspiriation of being composed of facts, not every claim found on some site deemed verifiable by someone. I understand you refuse to use your own brain/common sense and rather quote guidelines, but know that your "contribution" does not improve wikipedia in the least. Noone ever supported your assessment of the genre, and you yourself couldn't back your claims (considering you know they are more influenced by visual key and glam rock than emo you must at least believe you have some knowledge about music), much less deliver a review that describes them as glam rock. Lastly, I would like to know how old you are. You don't need to answer if you feel it's too personal, but this whole issue would be a lot easier to handle (for me personally), if I knew you are only an immature child that will probably grow out of this phase in a year or two and then remove that genre. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorwath (talk • contribs) 19:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The article desribes them as german glam rock. It is a verifiable source. Your personal opinion isn't. That is the end. --neonwhite user page talk 05:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

use your head,man,do you see any similarities between KISS and TH?or any other glam rock band and TH?and look for more different sources...--Sloba (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not for us to decide, see WP:NOR. Wikipedia relies on sources not editors opinion. --neonwhite user page talk 22:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

but then,why not use allmusic guide as a source.its album ratings are featured on most Wikipedia album articles.and they say: punk/pop,pop-rock and adult alternative.besides,man,hear me out,MTV is always focused on music that is currently in,they tend to "forget" about old tunes and thus they should not be considered verifiable or reliable on an issue about a genre of music that's half dead today (there aren't many,if any,glam rock bands today).there are plenty of bands that were influenced by glam rock and TH is one of them,but to call them a glam rock band would be simply incorrect.MTV doesn't ever go deep into subgenres of rock music.they,like,know about rock,hard rock and heavy metal and that's about it --Sloba (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Allmusic guide does not refute mtv categorization and even if it did it wouldn't matter. That fact remains that they are considered 'glam-rock' by reliable soureces. You cannot simple dismiss a notable media source because you don't like it. MTV has a distinct history in music reporting and the definition of genres like all media. --neonwhite user page talk 04:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Citation #9 should be removed as tokiohotelus.com/blog is not a verifiable source for who Bill is friends with or dating. The content re: Hildur Panula-Heinonen is based on what? Some random person saw them walking on the street? Please remove this. They are just a fansite and this is an effort to get their fansite linked to the wiki.ChuckleBaby (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)ChuckleBaby

US Releases

The band have released two singles in the US. The first had "Scream" and "Ready, Set, Go!" and I think it had no title. The cover said simply "Tokio Hotel" and used the cover art from "Schrei: So Laut du Kannst". That one was released in Fall 07 (October, I think) and was available at Hot Topic only. "Scream America" was released in December and is available from numerous stores and on iTunes. It has "Scream" and the "Ready, Set, Go!" remix. I wanted to make sure the page distinguished between the two, as it seemed to confuse and condense both releases into the "Scream America" release. I retained the currently unsourced statements about the IMF and the "Scream" album's specific release date from the previous edit. NDow (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

US Dates

The final show for their North America tour is incorrect. It has been moved from Blender at Gramercy Theater (it is incorrectly listed as Gramercy Theater) to The Fillmore New York at Irving Plaza. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjmahon623 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

PUNK ROCK??

They have nothing to do with punk rock! in the text is standing that they are a punkband please change this crap —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.211.96.93 (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz Trumper

Birthday: September 1, 1989 Zodiac sign: Virgo Height: 6' even (1.83m) Weight: 115 pounds (52 kg)

Favorites Foods: Pizza, hamburgers, waffles, sweets Drinks: Erdbeermilch (similar to a smoothie), sodas, Dooley's (a toffee vodka) Colors: Red and black Music: Nena, Placebo, Green Day

Bill Kaulitz was born on September 1, 1989. He is ten minutes younger than his twin brother, Tom Kaulitz. When the two were young, they had to wear shirts with their names on them, so that people could tell them apart.

When the twins were seven, their parents separated. The two lived with their mother and stepfather. Their stepfather, Gordon Trümper, reportedly played a big part in the twins' decision to persue music, as he had a band of his own.

When Bill was in grade school, he was given a hard time by his classmates due to his unconventional appearance. Despite this, however, he did well in school, averaging between a 1 and a 2, exceptional grades in the German system. According to Bill, he liked art, but never math or physical education.

When Bill was 13, he appeared on Germany's Star Search television program, singing "It's Raining Men" by The Weather Girls. He has also done voice work for the German dub of "Aurthur and the Invisibles", as well as various modelling jobs.

Bill's appearance can be described as androgynous, reminiscent of David Bowie or Japanese manga characters. He has two known body piercings (eyebrow and tongue), and three tattoos (a star on his abdomen, the Tokio Hotel logo on his neck and some kind of design on his arm).

The tattoo on his arm says "Freiheit 89" which is German for "Liberty." and he was born in 1989. Favourite Word: Dreist ~(Anonymous1)

i read in people that he started dying his hair when he was 9. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.60.89.215 (talk) 19:40, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Cancellation tour has no source

"A new update on the 1000 hotels tour, lead singer Bill Kaulitz has become quite ill over the period of shows, on Friday 14th of March in Marseille he couldn't get through many of the songs and had to stop halfway through using a translater to explain to the crowd. Tonight the 18th of March in Lisbon fans in the arena were informed by Bill's brother, guitarist Tom and bassist and drummer Georg and Gustav, that Bill was too ill too perform and that the rest of the tour was cancelled and would be postponed indefinately. Bill, now back in Germany is reported to be seeing specialists about his voice."

Does anyone have a source for this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.14.251.103 (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

From what I've heard about half of this is true but there has not been any official confirmation that the tour has been cancelled indefinately. I think it would be best to remove the problematique information altogether as it is mostly speculation at this point. Also the "Tonight the 18th of March in Lisbon fans" stuff is written even though it's the 17th which is definately very odd. AngelOfSadness talk 15:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

The English and German single articles (Proposed merges)

While it isn't firm set wikipedia policy, I think it woud be better to merge and redirect the English versions(that were released as singles) to the German versions(that were released as singles as there's no real point having two articles on each song released as a single and this way it will conform with the guidelines of WP:SONGS(Apparently translations of songs are treated the same as covers like in Suspicious Minds). This has been done with other artists articles who have also released multiple versions of the same song as a single for example: Shakira with Objection (Tango) / Te Aviso, Te Anuncio (Tango), Whenever, Wherever/Suerte and Hips Don't Lie/Será, Será.
So this would mean Monsoon (song) would be merged and redirected to Durch den Monsun. Both versions of the video would be mentioned in the article (under music video) but it would be made distinctive which video belonged to which version of the song. All of the information of both versions of the single would exist in the Charts section which of course a distinction made between chart positions of each version, perhaps like chart 3 on Wikipedia:Record charts. Then the release dates of both versions would also be mentioned etc in the opening paragraph or a section called "release history". And this would be done for all of the single articles. Whatever version of the single was released first will be the title of the article and so the other version's article will be merged and redirected so that's the naming conventions covered.
If no one has any objections, I will gladly start the work as soon as possible but only if people are generally ok with it. And so comments would be very much appreciated. Regards AngelOfSadness talk 19:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

i agree. go ahead. --neonwhite user page talk 02:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as it's been three days since I proposed the merges, I'm going to take it that people are generally ok with it as I'm sure people would have voiced their opinions by now if they objected to the merges. And so I am going ahead with it and it would be wonderful if everyone could avoid editing those pages( more specifically the German version pages) for the next few hours while I carry out the merges. I'll put some {{inuse}} templates on each of the pages anyway. Thank you to all who spent time reading the proposal(kinda long I know :D) and thank you also to those who voiced their thoughts about the proposal. AngelOfSadness talk 16:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

What is missing

The article reads too much like a list. We need a couple of paragraphs near the beginning to say what the group are intending to do, what kind of songs they write and why. Otherwise it is too close to help notes for Trivial pursuits! 90.11.101.102 (talk) 09:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately it's a lot easier to be said than to be done especially when such a revamp would need to be done with reliable sources etc. as if it's going to be done it may as well be done right the first time round. You know, you are more than welcome to create an account and make the changes yourself or, if you don't want to create an account, you can mention the changes you would make to the article here and then the registered users could make the changes providing they are in accordance to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. But I do agree that the article needs some attention so I'll try to improve the article and anyone is welcome to help :) AngelOfSadness talk 13:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I see nothing at all wrong with the article. As you seem to be a new editor, reading the welcome page is highly recommended. The Tokio Hotel discography:discography is seperated for clarity reasons. We cannot say what a person or group intends to do unless it is sourced. --neonwhite user page talk 14:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

I think the only thing wrong with the article was that a lot of the information didn't flow too well together. Sure the first two/three paragraphs of the career section were fine but the updates from new accounts tagged at the bottom of the section looked more like a trivia section than part of an article. But I think now it should flow better after I merged the history/career section into one and split that into sections, like the way some featured band articles are split for example Radiohead. And of course some of the article is still relatively unsourced but it's best to work with the content we have before adding in extra info like the band's intentions. AngelOfSadness talk 17:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

2008 Spring/Summer Tour cancelled due to vocal chord problems; new tour in Autumn/Winter????

Please change the 2008 Tour Section:

Tokio Hotel has cancelled the whole Spring/Summer tour due to Bill's vocal chord problems, he has a vocal chord cyst and will be operated on it this coming week. After the operation he has to rest his voice (absolutely NO TALKING OR SINGING, he has to communicate via sign language or pen an paper) for at least 3-4 weeks (until at least April 22th) after that he needs logopedy ('speaking therapy') and singing lessons to recover his voice properly and learn to use it the right way to protect it. He will be out for at least 3-4 months, so I think a new tour will be launhed in Autumn (sept-dec 2008)!

Please put the cancellation in the 2008 Tour Section and place the new dates there when they will be announced! I think new dates will be announced at least in July/August 2008 for a "new" tour in okt-dec 2008!

S.

86.87.83.143 (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

The tour cancellation has been mentioned both of the 1000 Hotels and the North American tours. However the expected/estimated tour in Autumn/Winter is just spectulation therefore that part has not been added. AngelOfSadness talk 18:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Rumour

is it true that bill may have died?? someone please email me the answer <e-mail address removed to prevent spam>

No. I'm fairly sure he's still alive. AngelOfSadness talk 19:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Citation for Concerts beginning again in May post-Bill surgery

This was confirmed in People Magazine.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20190136,00.html

ChuckleBaby (talk) 20:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)ChuckleBaby

Challenge to "verifiable sources" listed.

I challenge, under Wiki rules, the following sources in citations. That site is a fansite, a fanrun blog and as such, does not meet Wiki Criteria:

^ http://tokiohotelus.com/blog/?page_id=3 ^ http://tokiohotelus.com/blog/?page_id=7 ^ http://tokiohotelus.com/blog/?page_id=6 ^ http://tokiohotelus.com/blog/?page_id=5

The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. "Verifiability" in this context means that readers should be able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed.

tokiohotelus.com/blog is not an official site, it is merely a fan run blog containing opinions, news reporting and conjecture, gossip. If there is true news, the editor could site the source, and not the blog, i.e., site People Magazine or the Official Tokio Hotel sites.

In particular, the reference to Hildur Panula-Heinonen as Bill being "spotted with her" seems better suited to a gossip blog, not the wiki.

ChuckleBaby (talk) 21:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)ChuckleBaby

You're right about the sources and so I'm going to try and find some reliable sources to replace the blog sources. Considering the band have done countless interviews with this content over the years it shouldn't be too hard to find sources from some well respected magazines and such. As for the rumour of Bill and Hildur, I have removed it as well, like you, ChuckleBaby, said this ain't exactly a gossip blog :) AngelOfSadness talk 20:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

NEW AWARDS¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡

I'm writting just to inform that tokio hotel has won many awards since Febreary 2008, i mean the page needs this new information to be completed and also perfectly updated.the awards are:

     -May 2008:Silver Otto
     -May 2008:MTV TRL(Italy):Best Number One Of The Year MOONSON
     -May 2008:MTV TRL(Italy):Best Band
     -May 2008:Comet 2008 :Best Band
     -May 2008:Comet 2008 :Best Live-Act
     -May 2008:Comet 2008 :Best Video
     -May 2008:Comet 2008 :Super-Comet

       PLEASE UPDATE THIS PAGE CORRECTLY AND PEOPLE WILL BE ABLE TO SEE ALL THE AWARDS TAHT THEY'VE WON LATELY¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
           THANK YOU  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tokiohotelspanishfan (talk • contribs) 22:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC) 

Sure thing. It shall be done in a jiffy :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

North American TV debut

I think the article should mention that Tokio Hotel made their North American television debut May 9, 2008 on Late Night with Conan O'Brien.

Zapp7 (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

MMVA awards

does anyone know if there going to the 2008 MMVA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.151.156 (talk) 21:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Tom Kaulitz Jumper[[Image:

Birthday: September 1, 1989 Zodiac sign: Virgo Height: 5' 10.5" (1.80m) Weight: 115 pounds (52 kg)

Favorites Foods: Pizza, hamburgers, pasta, waffles Drinks: Red bull and soda Cars: Lobster, BMW Music: Samy Deluxe, Snoop Dogg ]]

Tom Kaulitz was born on September 1, 1989. He is ten minutes older than his twin brother, Bill Kaulitz. When the two were young, they had to wear shirts with their names on them, so that people could tell them apart.

When the twins were seven, their parents separated. The two lived with their mother and stepfather. Their stepfather, Gordon Trümper, reportedly played a big part in the twins' decision to persue music, as he had a band of his own.

Tom did well in school, averaging between a 1 and 2, excellent grades in the German grading system. His favorite subjects included Art and Ethics, along with debate-type classes.

Tom enjoys playing video games, which he plays often with his brother. He also enjoys graffiti art, although he himself no longer tags. The twins enjoy spending time with their cat (Kasimir) and dog (Scotty) as well.

Tom's appearance can be described as urban - his hair is in dreadlocks over a meter in length, and his clothing is generally baggy and American. He has one known body piercing (lip), but unlike his brother, he has no tattoos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darkblackmoon (talk • contribs) 04:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I removed the trivial information from the article which is also mentioned in the last two sections of this talkpage as the trivia is completely unsourced and also is content that can be found on any fansite. As this isn't a fansite, and is an online encylopedia, it's best to stick to facts of the bands/band members careers as content like their hobbies wouldn't be found in a paperback encylopedia unless those hobbies greatly influenced their career. So I kept the material regarding Bill's voiceover work in "Arthur and the Invisibles" and also content like when they started playing instruments. We'll have to find reliable sources for them but it shouldn't be too hard to find considering the amount of interviews this information is mentioned in. AngelOfSadness talk 13:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I would like to point that the bassist info is total bullshit.... As far as the bass he's playing it's not a axe bass because it's pretty much only gene simmons that uses those and it does not look like an axe from photos. He's a sandberg endorsee, source is verified on the sandberg official site. And i'm not hearing much flea influences in his playing. Plus is a straight copy from a fansite.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.210.136.109 (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz

Isn't Bill Kaulitz female? I noticed the article refers to her as a "he" throughout. I'm a bit new to Wikipedia (as an editor, at least) and I don't want to screw anything up, so could someone confirm and fix this? Just do a Google Image search, it's pretty obvious haha Ares139 (talk) 15:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

The article is correct. No need to fix anything. AngelOfSadness talk 15:08, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

OO ya answer her question but don't answer mine about the mmva????:@ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.50.6.154 (talk) 23:53, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Their attendance at the mmva is really quite irrelevent as this talkpage is to help the improvement of the article's standards not a general discussion about the band. The person who started this particular topic was referring to the content of the article itself and so was within Wikipedia's talkpage guidelines but general discussion about the band is not within the guidelines. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 16:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz

hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.13.35.19 (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Hes Cute and all but He isn't emo. Sorry.

                                -Roxie,18 Roxie.pear (talk) 21:59, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

"Tokio Hotel, who are awesome, were founded by[...](they are soo fit!)." (first sentence under "Founding")

Oh, please. Someone please remove this! I tried, but I can't. 69.243.46.124 (talk) 16:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

It's already been removed by another editor a few hours back. AngelOfSadness talk 18:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protection

I've requested semi-protection (See this.) on this article due to all the vandalism done by random IP addresses. Hopefully, it will go through. - J-Whitt (talk) 04:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Sweet, it went through. This article is now protected until October 1, 2008. - J-Whitt (talk) 05:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Who The Hell Put 'Boy Bands' ?!

?!?!?!?! 76.195.57.210 (talk) 22:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Main Picture

Could someone please replace the main image with the Wiki Media Commons image (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Tokio_Hotel.JPG) as this picture represents the band better and not just Bill Kaulitz. The band themselves have said on many times that they do not have a lead person.Tokeltel (talk) 00:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The lead paragraph

Any reason as to why most of it was deleted. If it was because it was lengthy and descriptive, it's actually supposed to be as it acts as a summary of the article per WP:LEAD which every article on Wikipedia is supposed to have. It was three paragraphs long mentioning their achievements(MTV awards, how many albums/singles sold etc.) and success(in other countries etc.) for a reason because having a good lead is the way forward with this article in terms of getting it to Good Article status and eventual Featured Articles status. The original lead paragraph was modelled after other band article leads such as Metallica and Nine Inch Nails(bear in mind those are Featured articles and so are appropriate models to work from). But anyway I'll re-insert the information and merge the two versions of the lead paragraphs and if anyone disagrees, it would be better to discuss it here. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 18:13, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

I corrected some typos in the lead paragraph. Is it just me or do the second and third part of this lead paragraph say the same now? They both say that the band is succesful both in German-speaking countries and other European countries. The third part of the lead paragraph seems to be a tad superfluous at this point, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freiheit 89 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Actually now that you mention it the whole European success info is repeating itself just said a different way. So I'll remove the second repeat of the info from the third paragraph while keeping the last line of the third paragraph that's about their success in the US and Canada. I think that should fix it :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I propose reverting it back to [1] adding the info about their MTV European Music Award. The current version is abysmal. It's far too long and contains minor detail that doesnt belong in a lead. --neonwhite user page talk 18:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

But it's a lot of the minor detail which establishes their notability (which is very important to show in the lead) and also The lead should not "tease" the reader by hinting at but not explaining important facts that will appear later in the article (taken from WP:LEAD) which is the only real problem with the version you pointed out Neon White as it suggested their success in other countries but didn't elaborate on how/why they were successful and it didn't mention any of their albums or most successful single (very important for any good article lead on a band/artist). It's important to remember that the lead is supposed to serve as both an introduction and a summary of the most important aspects of the article's topic and, at the same time, should be able to stand alone as an overview of the topic. Maybe re-write the lead that mentions the EMA win, the three successful albums and their most recent DVD release which was also fairly sucessful along with the important singles such as Durch den Monsun(their debut and bit about it's impact), Ready Set Go (first single released in Canada causing the Scream album to be very successful) etc. AngelOfSadness talk 19:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it's supposed to be a summary. The article covers the rest. We dont need to say they recording an unreleased demo-CD under the name "Devilish" this is a minor point in the article so why is it in the summary? Foremost it should establish notability that is further elaborated in the article. There is no problem with that version it states facts clearly. 'why they were successful' is not something an article is there to establish. The foremost point of notability is that they have had four number one singles and has released two number one albums in their native Germany, selling nearly 3 million CDs and DVDs there. and won an EMA. That's all we really need to put. Get rid of sales figures, info about releases and all the OR/synth parts like currently enjoying exposure in Canada and the United States. --neonwhite user page talk 15:25, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

This is all that it needs :-

Tokio Hotel is a German rock band from Magdeburg, Germany created in 2001 by guitarist Tom Kaulitz and singer Bill Kaulitz. The quartet have achieved four number one singles and two number one albums in Germany and won a MTV European Music Award for Best Inter Act in 2007.

I agree with the Devilish Cd mention:it being quite minor in comparision to everything else. The above summary is fine, it was the second paragraph in the version pointed out earlier which could easily tease the reader by listing off countries and references but no reason explaining why the content was specifically important above much of the content in the rest of the article which was why I mentioned it in the last comment. Apparently they won a World Music Award in 2006 for Schrei album sales (I think the specific category was "Best Selling German Artist") and seeing as it is quite a major award maybe it deserves a mention in the lead aswell. But we'll have to keep an eye on the lead as I've noticed over the last few months content, like their current position on the Much Music countdown which is definately minor in comparision, was being added and even that tidbit would be more suitable for the body of the article on the specific song(Even that wouldn't belong in the lead of that article). Sorry for rambling on here on that last part but we do have to watch out for that kind of thing especially now as semi-protection has ended. AngelOfSadness talk 16:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

The world music awards are more of a charity event than a major award like a grammy. --neonwhite user page talk 01:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

You're probably right but it was a just a suggestion seeing as the awards are fairly well known as it is broadcasted worldwide every year and are issued based on worldwide sales figures not votes by critics or fans unlike nearly all of the awards that the band have won. All the WMA means is that: for the year of 2006 Tokio Hotel were best selling German artist worldwide. Personally, I don't know if it is or is not worth mentioning in the article at all but I thought I'd throw it out there anyway. :) AngelOfSadness talk 19:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

they are POP ROCK!!!, like a hanna montana or the jonas brothers. <<<NO THEY FUCKING ARENT ASSSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!! THEY ARE GLAM ROCK/ EMO

it's a shit and it's NOT POP ROCK, it's fuckin' emo, bitch

acctually, the PEOPLE in the band are not emo... bits of their MUSIC is anyone who says the PEOPLE are emo need to die 70.89.180.125 (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

NOT EMO!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.248.44.241 (talk) 20:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Not "Pop Rock" either. You can't compare the Jonas Brothers with Tokio Hotel. They both have unique sounds and styles. . .(unfortunately a few too many people compare them). (Anonymous1)

Anyone saying the band plays emo got to be kidding. --Catscratches (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I totallay Agree they arn't Emo they're pop/rock they only want to be emo or punk they may have bits of thier music emo but thy're not. Sorry!

                                       -Roxie,18 Roxie.pear (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

You people are just ignorant for even having this conversation. No one cares about your opinions. Genres of music are based on the way they sound for crying out loud. Example: 50 Cent decides to all of a sudden say his music is Death Metal. It's obviously not. But since he SAID it's Death Metal, does that make it so? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.10.3 (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

that's exsactly the point, this band, saying or not they're emo, it NOTHING like emo, or does this band sounds like Embrace (U.S. band) or rites of spring? (the biggest emo bands, if you dont know it you're a poser =]) User:Sheish —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.164.98.134 (talk) 01:32, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Right or wrong there are literally hundreds of sources (MTV.com & allmusic guide anyone?) saying they are Emo. Seeing as that's one of the few genres they are said to be apart of and it can be reliably sourced, it goes in the article unless there are just as many reliable sources which refute this claim. I personally don't think they are Emo however opinions are not reliable content and just so you know Wikipedia is about verifiablilty not truth. This means only what can be verified through reliable sources goes in the article not what is generally believed to be true unless it can be reliably verified. AngelOfSadness talk 12:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

well if those sources say its emo then those sources are not well prepared and can't be considered as reliable, can they?--Sheish 6 Sheish (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

But the thing is with genres is that we can't go with sources from MySpace sites, fansites or even memorabilia sites as they are considered unreliable fullstop even though they are closer to pin-pointing the correct genre of bands than media sites like MTV.com and allmusic.com which are accepted as being reliable. Also Tokio Hotel have been said to sound like Fall Out Boy and AFI by music critics in many music magazines/music reviews and yet both bands have also been considered Emo. And also obviously there is something there which makes most music critics consider them Emo. I mean the bulk of the album reviews for their English album refer to them as Emo so would they really call them that for the hell of it and risk losing credibilty. And I'm talking about the reviews of Rolling Stone and even Billboard magazine, where they refered to them as Emo among other things like glam and pop/rockwhich , and yet both are very respectable and reliable music magazines. Like it or not, but it seems the rest of the music world considers them to be Emo. Remember that the whole genre mention in the infobox is to give readers an indication of what the band sounds like and Tokio Hotel have elements of poprock, emo, glam rock and a whole load of other genres. It's not like we're saying Tokio Hotel is Emo fullstop, we're just saying they have elements of the genre as well as a whole load of other genres aswell. AngelOfSadness talk 13:25, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I know that's exactly why the world is falling appart... heh

But its as acurate that this band is emo as saying blink 182 or sum 41 was punk, or that the ragnarök is the begining of times in greek mythology. Besides nor AFI or FoB are emo, you know...

about a year ago i talked with someonen on the reliable sources page, site, thing, whatever, he told me he wouldn't consider MTV as a reliable source (me neither), but as you said, there are hundreds of sites saying its emo... --Sheish 6 Sheish 03:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

MTV and rolling stone are extremely reliable sources. You need to understand that it is the media, in particular the major publications like NME, rollingstone, allmusicguide, mtv etc that identify and define genres and what bands are included. --neonwhite user page talk 12:40, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

well yeah i know rolling stones and shit are reliable sources, BUT there's no way MTV can be considered as a reliable source due to the many generes they've ruined (rock, for example; metal, in those days of glam metal, or in the 90s with nu, even tho metal is about extreme complexy and heaviness all the way around and very few nu metal bands used both, and if used one, it was heaviness; between others...). Well then, i'm still against Tokio hotel being called emo, but well... i can't do much against... im too lazy for that =)--Sheish 6 Sheish 20:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheish (talk • contribs)

MTV is a reliable source, they are an established channel dedicated to music with a reputation. Your opinion and your frankly bizarre and nonsensical claim that they 'ruin genres' is not important. --neon white talk 21:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

well you might be right when saying my opinion got no point, but yes, MTV, i dont care how dadicated is to music (actually, right now is EXTREMLY dedicated to fake "reality" shows, the music they're stull running is to keep fitting in the M of the MTV). They HAVE ruined too many generes, punk and metal, i mean, limp bizkit metal? blink 182 punk? what else? the jonas brothers are hardcore punk? hell no--Sheish 6 Sheish 01:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheish (talk • contribs)

I agree with them sounding like AFI, but defintely not fall out boy. and please don't compare them to hannah montana or jonas brothers. they are more an alternative sound then anything else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.229.235.113 (talk) 11:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC) This discussion is pointless- just look up the genres- It can be emo, but it certainly CANNOT be considered Glam Rock. Period. The database is locked right now, but when it's open, someone edit that.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitrina192 (talk • contribs) 23:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Content of articles is based on verifiable sources not personal opinions. --neon white talk 01:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

"1000 Oceans" single

Since page protection has been lifted, many IPs have been adding "1000 Oceans" to the Singles section saying it is set for release on June 24th in America. I have scoured the internet for ages and I can't find anything to back up these rumours at all. Seriously, not even fansites are reporting this and I can't find even spectulation about this on music sites or even forums. Just a reminder that Wikipedia is not a place for "exclusives" nor is it a soapbox for specualtion. And so I request that if anyone has any reliable sources(official websites for the band or record company would suffice here) for this, would they please discuss the source here before adding it to the article. If I find anything, I'll comment about it here. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 16:31, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

On The Channel You Can Find The Video:

• The 1000 Oceans Video —Preceding unsigned comment added by tobijumper51 (talk • contribs)

Releasing a music video does not mean the song (which the video was made for) has been/will be released as a single. Take for example "Wir Schliessen uns ein" which is a b-side of a single not an a-side (it's own seperate single). Or even Evanescence's Good Enough, there's an official music video and there was no official single release. Or even the CD/DVD Version of Beck's The Information which has specific and different music videos for every song on the album yet there was only two singles released from that album. And then there as singles that have no videos but not releasing a video doesn not mean that the song was never released. With that said, something more substaintal would have to be found (Official website of record company or artist) and considering the band are in the middle of recording an album, the release of another single looks doubtful as usually artists only release singles while touring (tours help promote albums and singles) and Tokio Hotel have just released Monsoon as a single in America which they are currently touring. So releasing another single in the next 15 days or so while they're over there doesn't seem like it'll happen. Anyway, the song is a bonus track from a re-release and it hardly ever happens that bonus tracks are released as singles. Also seeing as the original speculated date for the release can and went without so much as another word about it, it seems like the song probably wasn't going to be released in the first place and was all wishful thinking and spectulation among fans AngelOfSadness talk 20:25, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

German orthography

The German titles are mostly misspelled. In German only nouns are capitalized, regardless of the line being a title or not. (The first word of a sentence or title is capitalized too, of course.) And correct capitalization is quite a serious matter in writing German. ;-) Correct is: an deiner Seite, spring nicht, rette mich, der letzte Tag, etc. Hope you get the idea. Add the first word capitalization and you've got the correct titles. I would have done it myself, but as you might know, the article is semi-protected. --88.67.20.95 (talk) 04:52, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. Now that they're fixed, I'll have to keep an eye on them as many people change the capitalisation in song titles thinking every word should have a capital letter when they shouldn't. Anyway, cheers for the reminder AngelOfSadness talk 19:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

The Picture

Shouldn't we change the main picture on the Tokio Hotel page to their Logo like the one in the German Version (Tokeltel (talk) 21:26, 13 May 2008 (UTC))

We would have the logo but such logos are non-free images/commercial images. Wikipedia only uses non-free images for specific reasons, and require justification explaining said reason. Using a non-free logo as the main picture or even at the top of the infobox wouldn't meet the required justification needed to use such an image in the article. It is also important to rememeber that the function of the main picture is to illustrate the subject of the article - the subject of this article is the band members of Tokio Hotel not their logo. Logos are only used really for company/organisation articles not for band articles unless the logo is particularly significant. I don't know what the specific guidelines are on the German Wikipedia about logos but this is what's done on the English Wikipedia. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 15:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

I don't see none of these as being better, but watev: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tokio_Hotel

Pozilla (talk) 20:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Shouldn't we use a picture of the whole band as Bill (the person pictured in the picture) says that he doesn't consider himself the leader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.38.121 (talk) 13:22, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree. As opposed to a copyrighted image, we could just jack a BETTER, more updated picture, if any.Ara6012 (talk) 19:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The Genres of Tokio Hotel require changes.

Tokio Hotel is neither Emo nor is it Glam Rock. They are Pop Rock and to an extent I would even except Pop Punk. However, Emo is a dead genre that was purely underground and had a very different musical style, while Glam Rock was a genre that came from Hard Rock and the only one who is "glamorous" in Tokio Hotel would be Bill Kaulitz. Glam Rock features EVERYONE in the band it outlandish and nostalgic costumes. Not just a singer in trendy clothing worn by many teenagers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FullBleed (talk • contribs) 22:51, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia is based on verifiable sources not personal opinions. --neon white talk 04:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. It cannot be defined as glam rock because of the time period glam rock spanned. Revival movements are referred to as 'emo rock'. Hence the first genre. However, glam metal is a genre using glam rock elements in a more modern fashion which came about in the 90s as opposed to the 70s. Ara6012 (talk) 23:34, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Not this genre

Tokio Hotel is not a Emo band is a Pop/rock band : http://german.about.com/od/music/a/TokioH.htm ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by HxC Pit (talk • contribs) 00:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

HEY, ASSHOLE!!!!!!! LISTEN TO THEIR LYRICS, THEY ARE!!!!! okay example, 'i hold your letter in my frozen hand, the last line was long, as long as it burns...' (from Love Is Dead) THAT IS SO EMO!!!! Emo means emotional, that IS emotional!!! and for example, 'Rescue Me' By Tokio Hotel is VERY emotional, and Hawthorne Heights, an emo band, has a song called Rescue Me with the same type of emotional lyrics! Who the hell put Pop Rock??? They are NOT! It took me like a week to memorize the tune of their songs! Pop rock is based on a memorible tune (ie, after one time hearing it, like Girlfriend by Avril Lavigne) and a VERY catchy chorus!!!!!! Emo doesnt mean they cut themselves and want to die, THAT IS A STEROTYPE!!!! It means emotional lyrics, for example 'there’s nothin left here anymore my room is cold it’s makin me insane i’ve been waitin here so long but now the moment seems to‘ve come i see the dark clouds comin up again' from Monsoon, YOU ASSHOLES dont know the meaning of EMO!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milliemaxsam (talk • contribs)

It's all fair and well to discuss this topic but please do not resort to calling people "Assholes" because they have a difference of opinion as that is not only uncivil but is also considered a personal attack and personal attacks are not at all taken lightly.

Now back to the topic at hand, we have several reliable sources such as MTV and Rolling Stone that say they are and both MTV and Rolling Stone are known for being well-respected sources and even such music publications are known for defining such genres. But there are sources(in fairness most of them aren't as reliable as the emo citations) which say that they are a pop/rock band. However there has been not one reliable source to suggest that describing them as pop/rock or emo is completely wrong. Therefore this isn't a case that one genre cancels out the other, it's more a case of that the band have elements of both pop/rock and emo as generally suggested by music critics and journalists. We're not strictly calling them emo (Like Thursday) or pop/rock (Like Shakira) because they are neither but in between the two.

You also have to remember that genres like emo tend to be battered around by the media whether they are correct or incorrect in their assertion (so that could be true for Tokio Hotel aswell). Sure even the media see bands like Panic at the Disco and My Chemical Romance as emo even though both bands have denied connection with the genre as in with the actual sound of their music sounding like the original emo of the 1980's not the sterotype.

Unfortunately, as I've said time and time again, Wikipedia is about verifiable facts not truth and so that's why emo and glam rock are listed in the infobox as they are both verifiable genres with numerous reliable sources as the references. The only problem with the whole pop/rock thing is that about three fairly reliable sources will be needed as it is quite, currently, disputed whether they are, in fact, pop/rock (the same was done with emo and glam rock as they too are disputed). Just post the sources on this talkpage when you find them and the discussion will commence to see if they are suitable and reliable enough for the article. But please do not blank the infobox of what genres you don't like (especially as they are all currently well sourced, removal of them could be seen as vandalism without a valid explaination preferably on this talkpage) as that is seen an individual point of view (then it would be a WP:NPOV violation as editors on this talkpage/article have gone to great lengths to make sure that all significant viewpoints are mentioned and removal of either viewpoint will show clear bias in the article by not covering the major viewpoints) and articles are not for unsourced points of view and it's just leads to lame edit wars where nothing will get fixed and the editors involved will get in a lot of trouble. AngelOfSadness talk 17:46, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

You do make a point about My Chemical Romance and Panic At The Disco being called 'emo' but I never recall hearing Tokio Hotel say that they didnt want to be called emo! But, if they did say they dont want to be called emo, then just because they dont want to be called emo doesnt make them pop rock! There has to be a genre that fits better for them. The Jonas Brothers and Hannah Montana are pop rock, it wouldnt be fair to classify Tokio Hotel with them, because their is a HUGE difference in lyrics! And, I am sorry for swearing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milliemaxsam (talk • contribs) 14:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel have not agreed or disagreed to if they are Emo or not (at least I don't remember them talking about it at any stage). I was saying (I think in earlier genre dabates currently viewable on this talkpage) that Tokio Hotel have been compared to so-called, by the media, emo bands (Fall Out Boy etc.) even if it's fair or not to make that comparision or if calling the other bands Emo is appropriate in the first place. You do also have to remember that while half the media compare Tokio Hotel to Emo bands, the other half compare them to Jonas Brothers and Hannah Montana (Tokio Hotel haven't disagreed with that viewpoint either) and even some members of the media go as far as saying they are My Chemical Romance meets Hannah Montana (and yes I have seen a review saying something to that effect). But really what the band feels is their sound seems to be irrelevent in genre debates as if you look at both the My Chemical Romance and Panic At the Disco articles, both of them refer to each band as being Emo despite the band having a different opinion. There is not one definative genre that Tokio Hotel can fit into unless we simply say they are rock (fair to say and easily sourced) but hardly anyone wishes to agree with one genre as most bands tend not to fit into one genre unless the band themselves have defined a genre and that very seldom happens. Just say the infobox read: glam rock (previously agreed on with sources), emo (with sources) and pop/rock (with sources) (because it should have all of the main genres (summarising what has been said by the media)), I guarantee someone will come along probably a few hours later and remove any of the sourced genres without discussion with whatever they like and with an edit summary like "They are not Glam Rock, they don't sound at all like KISS"/"They sound nothing like MCR, removing incorrect genre"/"They are so not like Hannah Montana, removing vandalism"(if the page was unprotected) or would come to this talkpage disagreeing with all of the sourced genres saying pretty much something like the edit summaries above. What I'm saying is that it's nearly impossible to please everybody when it comes to a band's genre and I know from experience working on other band articles. But unfortunately it's not really up to the opinions of individual editor that determins the genres, it's the verifiable sources which matter. AngelOfSadness talk 20:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Could someone change the genere? its not emo, glamrock, its Pop and Pop-Punk! Plz change —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.236.146.53 (talk) 16:34, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Sorry but no changes without discussion and a whole load of sources I'm afraid and currently we've done a whole lot of discussion and got a whole bunch of sources saying they are glam rock, pop/rock and emo. But if you've got about three reliable sources for both pop and pop-punk, please post them here and we can discuss them. AngelOfSadness talk 20:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Emo is Hardcore Punk with emotional lyric! And TH is never Hardcore punk! And TH Glamrock.. lol sure.. its just Pop music! Pop-Rock or deutsch-rock. so plz change! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.236.146.53 (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

And how is personally attacking editors going to get us anywhere in this debate? Yet we have literally tons of sources saying they are Emo, maybe not 80's Emo or hardcore punk but the watered-down Emo of nowdays. Sources like MTV, allmusicguide and Rolling Stone who have actually defined genres for decades. Seeing as they, not us, have defined genres for decades, why on earth would they risk their reputation as being reliable music websites/magazines by calling a band Emo that isn't Emo? The opinions of editors actually means nothing in genre debates unless there are a whole load of reliable sources to give the opinion some sort of credibility. If you want to know, I don't think they are Emo but then again Wikipedia isn't about truth, it's about verifiable content and unfortunately Emo is a hell of a lot more verifiable than pop-punk. AngelOfSadness talk 12:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Well maybe tokio hotel is known in your country as a emo or glamrock (what the hell...) band, but here (Germany and Switzerland) no one would say that they are emo or glam rock. http://www.musicanddance.de/info/mad/diverse/div99/div20tokiohotel/div20.htm http://www.bildblog.de/tag/bild-und-tokio-hotel/ http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/02/20/arts/20toki.php http://www.de.wikipedia.org/Tokio_Hotel here everyone is saying they are a pop band. But im sure that for me TH isnt emo and never glam rock.. And the source who say that they are glam rock is an interview where bill said he's a glamrocker. but its the same as Slayer or someone else would say they are hip hop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.236.146.53 (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually literally no-one in Ireland has heard of Tokio Hotel as it is if you wish to know. And it's only because of discussion on this page and reliable sources as to why Emo and Glam Rock are written. With the sources you provided, the first one which is a page of a whole load of sources isn't very reliable considering it's a teen/gossip mag calling them Pop/rock halfway down the page. The second source, while I know is a well known German newspaper, is a well known tabloid and tabloids are not exactly known for being reliable. The third source seems fine and the fourth is the German Wikipedia which is completely unsuitable as a source. I wait a few days to see if anyone has a problem with the third source (iht.com) before adding pop to the infobox in order to prevent unnessesary reverts. And yest we have another source from Rolling Stone that says they are glam rock among other things so it's less about what the band thinks and more about what the respected music journalists think hence the sources. AngelOfSadness talk 17:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

On Glam Rock- It cannot be defined as glam rock because of the time period glam rock spanned. Revival movements are referred to as 'emo rock'. Hence the first genre which is appropriate. However, glam metal is a genre using glam rock elements in a more modern fashion which came about in the 90s as opposed to the 70s. Ara6012 (talk) 23:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately, there are not sources for glam metal but there are for glam rock. Like I said, since Wikipedia is about verfiablility (as in what verfiable) and we have three reliable sources for glam rock by respected music sources but none for glam metal, I'm afraid that we can't say glam metal without sources. AngelOfSadness talk 15:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Genres with associations to bands aside, Glam rock is a style of rock and pop music (Tokio Hotel are seen by many as pop/rock but sources haven't been found yet) and that glam metal is a subgenre of heavy metal (And I have never seen or heard any comparisions to anything heavy metal, not even metal, related in Tokio Hotel reviews/descriptions etc.). However you should also know that glam rock has branched off to several genres which Tokio Hotel are often associated for example Visual kei and Punk rock but glam rock is used mostly as an umbrella term to cover the main genres. The music infobox guidelines states that the number of genres should be kept generalised and very limited preferably something like rock but unfortunetaly unrelated users to these topics make edits to the infobox which make abiding by the guidelines impossible. And the reason why we should stay from complicating the whole genre list is by not listing every single genre under the sun by which they are associated which would be like: Pop/rock, pop punk, glam rock, glam metal, neo-goth, teeny-pop, bubblegum pop, emo.... etc. as the list goes on and the edit wars would only increase as more and more unrelated users see a genre they don't like and decide to remove it/change it and we will be back here again. AngelOfSadness talk 16:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

WE'RE NOT GETTING ANYWHERE ANYWAY! Just list ALL the genres!!Ara6012 (talk) 18:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Listing all the genres will not fix anything, I mean just look at any of the other music artist article talkpages. By listing all of them will just cause new editors to remove and change what genres as they please, I mean look what having only two genres listed has caused. All anyone can do, while abiding by the guidelines is to go extremely general, like rock or pop, in the infobox and then make a seperate "Style" section in the article itself listing all of the genres, explaining them and sourcing them (all of which takes a hell of a lot of time to do). But even with that, new editors will try to insert their own opinions in both the infobox and the Style section and yes I have seen it and it does happen. Either way, there's no way at all to please everyone and this pretty much goes for nearly every music act article whether it's a featured article like Gwen Stefani (which lists a whole load of genres in the infobox that are changed multiple times a day by new users) or Evanescence/Fall Out Boy (which both go with the Musical Style section and attempted generality in the infobox yet are also victim to the lame edit wars that are caused by genres).

The bottom line is that the personal opinions of editors, when it comes to genre, means absolutely nothing unless some reliable sources are referenced aswell because only what is verifiable can go in the article otherwise it gets removed. AngelOfSadness talk 20:05, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

DUDE, at least people will stop COMPLAINING that pop and punk and rock aren't listed! it'll get rid of those complaints. And who are you? The Tokio Hotel wikipedia article police? Ara6012 (talk) 02:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Actually it doesn't and won't stop people complaining, as I have already said (also if you hadn't noticed the amount of people that think they're emo or pop/rock etc. is about half and half on this talkpage so removing/changing them won't change the amount of complaints). If anything it will cause more trouble and will lead to people being blocked for edit warring over something so lame and trivial that it is not even worth it.

Forgive me if I'm not going to waste my time searching for reliable sources for things that other people want in the article, only for it to be removed by every other Tom, Dick and Jerry and then be back here again. But you are more than welcome to make the changes youself. I mean there's really nothing preventing you from doing that although sources will be needed (which is fair considering I'm not the one wanting to put glam metal/punk/pop/whatever in the article). I actually don't care what goes in that infobox as long as it's sourced but if I did care I would put in whatever genres and do the dirty work by searching for and inserting reliable sources as well as discussing the changes in a civilised manner on this talkpage instead of complaining over something that is so insignificant (if you think about it the genres in the infobox accounts for about 1% of this article's content).

And no I'm not the "Tokio Hotel wikipedia article police" as you put it, I'm just an editor who doesn't want to see potentially good editors blocked for stupid things aside from trying to increase the reliablility of the other 99% of the content in this article and related articles. AngelOfSadness talk 20:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

You are also ridiculously long-winded.Ara6012 (talk) 00:06, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

I also feel compelled to mention that iTunes lists them as being 'Pop'. Should that not count for something, and if it does, how the hell can you cite iTunes? Ara6012 (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Not really as itunes is a website that sells music and any website selling anything like mechandise, music etc. isn't used as a source in any music article. Also if you check WP:EL, such sites aren't allowed to be linked/cited in articles just like youtube, blogs, MySpace, Bebo, tabloids etc. I mean no-one is citing amazon.com or MP3.com in genre sections as they are known for selling products/services (have a hell of a lot of advertising) and not for their reliablilty. For example: In January (I think) of this year, the Irish version of itunes was selling OneRepublic's Apologize under Timbaland's discography without mentioning OneRepublic at all. The whole thing was reported on MTV UK news about a month or two back when it finally got sorted out (the reason I can't find the source is because it was said within a video interview with OneRepublic and well MTV aren't happy when any MTV content gets on youtube). Considering that they can't get the artists of a really well known track correct, I really don't think they are the most reliable website around.

Also, after checking the archives of Wikipedia's reliable sources noticeboard, I found two discussions regarding the reliablilty of iTunes and websites similar to iTunes here and here. Apparently, the only time when citing retailers (I think amazon.com/CD Universe is used more frequently in the following case) would be somewhat appropriate is in future album articles where such sites reveal the tracklisting, track lengths or release date i.e where content cited is merely trivia and wouldn't cause a huge debate on a discussion page. But citing amazon, for example, for genre content wouldn't be the best as much of the opinions are that of customers and so therefore making it as reliable as a blog which all blogs are genreally considered to be not very reliable.

WP:RS states Reliable sources are credible published materials with a reliable publication process; their authors are generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand. With that said, it seems well respected music publications (Rolling Stone, Billboard) or news organisations (like in album/single/gig reviews) with a reputation for fact-checking are the best sources to cite genres especially if the artists' genre is disputed. AngelOfSadness talk 17:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Andreas?

Shouldn't he be mentioned? He's always seen with them. Plus, he is their best friend and fan club head! And maybe you should add Nathalie (makeup artist) and Saki (body guard) too? Saki is usually seen too. 206.72.25.210 (talk) 17:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Not really as this article is about the band themselves including their formation, rise, achievements etc. and not so much about the people around them unless the people around them attributed to the band's formation, rise, achievements etc for example the twins' father (who taught them guitar) or the producers (who discovered them, helped them get signed and help them write the songs they are famous for). Mentioning other people who haven't attributed to the founding, rise, achievements etc. would just be seen as trivia that belongs only on a fansite not an encyclopedia. AngelOfSadness talk 17:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Best New Artist MTV VMA's 2008

So, this kinda needs to be added: Tokio Hotel got the BEST NEW ARTIST award at the 2008 MTV Video Music Awards on September 7, 2008. The band beat out entirely female competition that was already well established in the United States: Miley Cyrus with "7 Things," Katy Perry with "I Kissed a Girl," Jordin Sparks with "No Air," and Taylor Swift with "Teardrops on My Guitar."

Sources: http://www.mtv.com/ontv/vma/2008/best-new-artist/ http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1594129/20080904/tokio_hotel.jhtml

User:Anonymous (User talk:Anonymous) 00:00, 8 September 2008

It's already been added. Cheers. AngelOfSadness talk 06:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Um

Can anyone here please act mature with respect to the discussion page? In order to make wikipedia more credible, you need to come on here and filter yourselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.104.32.27 (talk) 09:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

bill dead??

ok so ive heard recently a nasty rumor that bill kaulitz has died i dont belive it however i have no actuall proof so if you know 100 percent if hes dead or alive please tell me i cant bear not knowing thank you email me <e-mail address removed for safety purposes>24.59.166.179 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)mandi24.59.166.179 (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

It's not true. Just a nasty rumour. AngelOfSadness talk 19:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

oh,... so probably we were happy too soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.210.193.102 (talk) 16:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

No, He is not, they have been doing tours, and i know Georg Listings cousin, she would have told me if that would have happened. La4hi (talk) 23:24, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

okay im high up on the whole "tokio hotel rumors" and i have NEVER heard that one! where the heck did you get that one from?! wow. and no, duh, obviously he isn't dead. if he was the band would have broken up and tom would have jumped of a building.

Official Fanclubs

Tokio Hotel has recently named Official Fanclubs for many countries. Would it be possible to list those here?

Here is the source. [2]

These are not "fansites" but Official Fanclubs selected by Tokio Hotel management.

Christink (talk) 20:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)Christink September 9, 2008

It's an iffy area. I think many band articles don't list every Fanclub to avoid linkfarming (this is especially true for Good Articles & Featured Articles which only really have 5 or so links max for example Nine Inch Nails). We already have the offical website and record label links which are allowed by WP:EL as they would provide relevent correct content beyond the infomation in the article (currently we might have too many ELs but each technically allowed per WP:EL). You have to realise that if we start adding every Offical Fanclub, misguided editors will start adding Unofficial Fanclubs and Unofficial Fansites thinking it's ok and soon we'll have a giant linkfarm on our hands. Keep in mind that the Official MySpace, Offical Bebo or Official Youtube accounts aren't listed in the External Links section either. But like I said it's an iffy area as different editors have different views on linking such sites so it would be greatly appreciated if other editors could chime in to this discussion. AngelOfSadness talk 21:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz's name should be first

When the article begins it should say that: Tokio hotel is a german band founded in Magdeburg, Germany in 2001 by singer Bill Kaulitz, guitarist Tom Kaulitz, drummer Gustav Schäfer, and bassist Georg Listing.

So Tom Kaulitz's name should be moved to the second place. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rurururu (talk • contribs) 22:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Done. I'm fairly sure it used to be that way. Anyway, changing it back shouldn't cause problems. AngelOfSadness talk 22:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel is not emo:

{{editsemiprotected}} they are a german rock band! can somebody change it??

PLEASE CHANGE IT !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anahiid 11 (talk • contribs) 03:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

A "rock band" is very generic. There are reliable sources calling them a glam rock band, and there is a reliable source calling them an emo band, both sub(sub)genres of rock. I can agree turning the two genres around, calling them a glam rock band first since they appear to be called that more often, but in my insignificant opinion emo, as a hardcore punk subgenre with a focus on emotions, is a match. --Amalthea^Talk 10:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I think the reason for more sources for glam rock was because it was a lot more disputed and some people felt that the original sources weren't reliable enough therefore more sources were added. It's actually a lot more common to see them named as Emo rather than Glam Rock in gig and album reviews etc. but I don't think what order the genres are in is going to start an edit war. Anyway, like I said in other genre discussions on this talkpage, any other possible genres have to be discussed with other editors and reliably sourced before changes are made to the article. AngelOfSadness talk 16:21, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

They should be alphabetical with none given any bias. --neon white talk 17:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Archive

If no one objects I'm going to have MiszaBot archive the very old threads on this page (say older than 4 months), since this page is getting very long and I don't want to manually sort the threads by age. :) --Amalthea^Talk 10:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't object as the bot can do the task in a few seconds whereas manually it should take probably the best part of an hour. AngelOfSadness talk 16:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

The twin was born 1989. then the band formed 2001. that means.. they started the band when they were 12 yrs old?

I'm confused... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.106.145.126 (talk) 13:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

why? --neonwhite user page talk 16:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I was born September 11,1989 So I'm About the same age as him I really don't know how confusing how it could be how he could begin a band at that age?!!
-Roxie 18,Roxie.pear (talk) 22:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

First of all, I think that Bill certaintly had the talent to start a band when he was twelve, and it's hard to not agree with that. Bill is soooo talented now, and he was when he was twelve too. Tokio Hotel is big now, probably because they started so early. Never seen a twelve year do that huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.97.155 (talk) 13:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz does not have an androgynous look he is an identical twin of is brother and they have the same face!! Please change this! It is insulting to Bill, the band, and Tokio hotel fans everywhere! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.231.92 (talk) 15:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

There are a great many reliable sources that say so, e.g. [3], [4], [5] and [6].
And, on a personal note, I don't at all think that this is insulting in any way, but a great part of their success, as it is with other bands/singers like Brian Molko. --Amalthea^Talk 20:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Teen pop with references deleted!!!

You all that think that this band is not a teen pop band are so damn wrong. Read the teen pop article dumbasses. If I add teen pop to the genre list with references it should stay there. It should not be deleted by some ignorant 13 year old little girl. Wikipedia is based on reliable facts and not on personal opinions you ignorant little kids. And by the way, Tokio Hotel is not real glam rock. They are mostly neo-glam, because the original glam rock means those bands from the early 70's like Bowie, T.Rex, Alice Cooper, Slade and The Sweet. The post-70's glam rock is called neo-glam. -- JNCooper —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:21, 8 October 2008 (UTC).

First things first, please refrain from the personal attacks. Secondly, the genre field in the infobox has been removed altogether (other genres included) per discussion at this link. AngelOfSadness talk 17:36, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Bill Kaulitz article

I think we should hae a separate article o Bill Kaulitz kowing the fame he's achieved as well as the controversy. Does anyone else agree? Crazyconan (talk) 04:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

The only notable thing he has done, besides the band, is doing a voice-over for the German version of Arthur and the Minimoys and even his part in the film is not even mentioned in the film's article. As well as that it was decided in a previous discussion that that alone wouldn't be enough for a stand alone article. Also, if I remember correctly, any controversy relates mostly to his look int the band but that too wouldn't be enough to make a seperate article with enough substantial content to comply with WP:N and WP:RS etc. For now, I think it's best to stay with previous consenus and keep the article as a redirect to this one. AngelOfSadness talk 17:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Discussion Page

This discussion page is actually really good. Lots of info here. Some redundancy but otherwise pretty clear. (Anonymous1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.93.111 (talk) 02:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Bill und Bjork

Whomever wrote That Bjork is Bill Kaulitz's mother is going on false facts. Tom and Bill Kaulitz were born to Simone Trümper(back then it being Simone Kaulitz)No one in Tokio Hotel has ever addmitted to Bjork being Bill's mother. She cannot possibly be, if she were she would also be Tom's mother because they are IDENTICAL TWINS! Seriously I don't want to be mean but whoever wrote that is clearly an idiot and doesn't really know anything about the band. Oh and Tokio Hotel is no way in hell emo, They are GERMAN ROCK! ~Insomnias_Slave~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Insomnias Slave (talk • contribs) 03:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

The Bjork thing was vandalism that was eventually removed. And as for the genre thing, no changes happen without multiple reliable sources and some sort of discussion and this was done with with Emo and Glam Rock to the point we are beating a dead horse just by discussing it (Check archives if you wish for the multiple and lengthy discussions). AngelOfSadness talk 17:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel in the MTV Europe Music Awards - Rick Astley fans vs Tokio Hotel

This is a major current event for Tokio Hotel - Rick Astley fans, attempting to "Rick Roll" the MTV European music awards have directly attacked Tokio Hotel fan websites and the like in an effort to allow Rick Astley to win Best Act Ever. This is due in great part to their fear that Tokio Hotel fans are the only major competition. Flossaustin (talk) 01:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

If we were to add that it would have to be highly sourced with reliable sources and monitored with great care is it could get unwanted attention from IP editors (e.g. fans adding their own opinions on the issue). Also, it is already beginning to calm down after lasting about a week or two so it may not warrant a mention in the article as it is merely trivia like the whole Jonas Brothers fans vs. Tokio Hotel fans thing (as pointed out on MTV.com and PerezHilton.com) which has been going on for months or even the J.Rock fans vs. Tokio Hotel fans thing (as reported by numerous German publications) which has been going on for years. As you said it yourself, it is a current event but other more important details like the band's numerous returns to the US for touring and the recording of their third album has yet to be added to the article too. Common sense has to be used in order to determine what current events such be in the article but only what can be verified by reliable sources is added. The Rick Astley fans vs. Tokio Hotel fans is still only discussed on fan forums and blogs but nothing has been reported by reliable news organisations for it to be added as such a mention could risk a lot of original research (or views of the fans) being added to article instead of clear cut fact. AngelOfSadness talk 19:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Emo!??!? what the fuck???

Emo means "emotive hardcore punk". so, they aren't emo. they're just a pop-rock band.

Listen to some of the lyrics. Especially before Zimmer. Lyrics are certainly emo. For one, just look at the number of times the mention "nichts", which means "nothing". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.72.25.210 (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

they may be a bit emoish but that doesn't make them emo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.164.223.22 (talk) 21:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from using that sort of language. It's unnessecary. And this topic is already being discussed on the previous sections, so please don't clutter up the board with repetitive "information". Ara6012 (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2008 (UTC) yes...so ...

do you think that "emo" is a depressive-pop musical genre? no.

emo is a style of punk. this band isn't emo....the lyrics aren't emo..because emo lyrics aren't "depressive". Glam metal is such Guns n' roses or Motely Crue...so, they're not glam metal.

they're a pop-rock band.. stop fucking musical genres.

Don't start with me. And don't pretend to know more about Guns n' roses than me. These people on wikipedia insist that this band be Glam rock, which is an insult to ALL previous bands spanning the 70s, 80s, and 90s. I at least tried to make it Glam metal in an attempt to justify the whole glam aspect. It's more fitting at any rate due to the style and more modern aspect than galm rock.

I don't know what the heck isn't emo about them, but how are lyrics like "I'm burning can't you see?" and "Somewhere out there, you lost yourself in your pain. You dream of the end, to start all over again..." not emo? Ara6012 (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

what?? do you ever listen to Indian summer? do you ever listen to Moss Icon? Read their lyrics, are depressive? no. You don't know what REALLY emo is... Emo is DIY, emo is punk, emo is hardcore. emo is not this fashion-trendy bullshit. emo is not cutting yourself emo is a type of MUSIC, not only of lyrics

this is a simple pop-rock (not glam, not punk, not emo) band. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.7.69.49 (talk) 22:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

• Modern emo is different from old emo. 72.130.143.244 (talk) 01:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

The genres are based on reliable sources not what individual editors think. --neon white talk 23:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

why this could be emo? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.11.68.77 (talk) 21:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

even by modern day standards this band cannot be considered emo. it's their image that is making people think like this. all music has emotional lyrics (most of the time) so rather than claim that a band of scene kids singing emotional lyrics makes a band emo how about facing fact that emo is not a genre based in lyricism, it is a section of punk that even by today's standards holds ground closer to punk and indie music rather than the pop crap these boys play. the source quoted by MTV is completely unreliable because MTV wouldn't know "Emo" if it bitch-slapped them to the moon. Gellister (talk) 23:38, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

MTV is considered fairly reliable on Wikipedia because of their lengthy history of fact-checking. If a source is well known for being correct on the content it publishes it is considered a reliable source no matter what they content is. Wikipedia is about verifiablility not truth, so if a reliable source cites them as emo (multiple times might I add) we too have to refer to them as emo. I said this in previous genre debates and I'll say it one last time, why on earth would any well known reputable and reliable music sources risk their reputation by publishing something which to many people is clearly incorrect? They wouldn't. Anyway, Rolling Stone, Billboard, allmusic, livedaily.com and San Fransisco Chronicle seem to agree with MTV so maybe they're not as incorrect as one would think or at least would like to think, especially if highly respected online music magazines, like Rolling Stone and Billboard, are seemingly on the same wave-length as MTV. Anyway there's six reliable sources saying their emo, what critera of emo is being used to determine the genre of the band (80's emo or current stuff) is a different question either way there have never been any reliable sources brought to this discussion page that contradicted that Tokio Hotel are emo therefore emo is in the article. It's reliably sourced and verifiable making it meet Wikipedia's standards therefore there is no problem except the disagreement amongst individual editors but the views of individual editors mean nothing without sources. If you disagree with a genre find some reliable sources that contradict the existing genre and cite them on this talkpage to back up your view. Remember no sources = no changes. It's that simple. AngelOfSadness talk 18:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

MTV sucks, it's more than obvious that when a source is as bad informed as those to call a band like tokio hotel emo it isn't a reliable source, at leats within music, lets keep on mind that what these sources call punk is NOT PUNK AT ALL, and that emo is a subgenere of punk... also too all the ones that go with things like "the lyrics" is by far the STUPIDEST thing ever, lyrics do NOT make emo, emo is not like viking metal, emo is based on music, emotive hardcore punk, not emotional depressive lyrics made by a bad poet, ok?--189.164.160.109 (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

The reliability of sources is actually based on their history and reputation. Music magazines and music journalists are the definers of genres so what they say is fact. --neon white talk 01:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Whether you disagree with MTV or not, there are multiple other respected music publications that refer to Tokio Hotel as emo, and because our opinions don't matter, we go with the opinions of music critics as a lot of them say Tokio Hotel are emo thus covering a huge perception of the band's music in the media. There are other music publications than MTV and yet they, like Rolling Stone, Billboard etc. are agreeing with MTV. So what they say goes as far as genres are concerned. AngelOfSadness talk 19:01, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Who put 'virginity' between Tom and Bill?!

I noticed that the article was blocked, stating something abut virgintiy! Can someone explain me what has happened? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.248.96 (talk) 17:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why that was there. I removed anyway as it was misplaced and unsourced. Cheers for mentioning it. AngelOfSadness talk 17:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Big thanks User:AngelOfSadness. I love TH and there is no way vandalism is gonna go between that article, no sir! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.252.187 (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't vandalism actually. There WAS an English interview where Tom picks on Bill for being a virgin. I thought it was cute actually, because it shows that they haven't lost their sense of being teenagers. ~Alyska

I know it wasn't vandalism but as the members themselves don't give a clear answer about it, speculation or saying that there is no clear answer doesn't really belong in the article. Even if there was a clear answer, it still wouldn't go in the article unless that fact really affects their image, their work and in the process the media's perception of them like Britney Spears back in the 90's. Anyway it was, like I said, misplaced and unsourced and so it was removed as Wikipedia isn't a gossip or fansite which puts up every bit of trivia that can be found. You have to think of it like this, would you find uncertainty in a paperback Encyclopedia - the answer is no so there is no reason for it be in an online Encyclopedia article. AngelOfSadness talk 21:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Influence on the Band.

Bill Kaulitz REALLY looks like he's emulating one of 2 specific Japanese rock stars. & yes, they're both men.

Die from early Dir en Grey.

http://img320.imageshack.us/img320/6708/die0214vc.jpg http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i150/Henneth666/die010.jpg http://www.freewebs.com/vvhelenavv/Dir_en_Grey_Die.jpg http://www.kuchizuke.net/Kuchizuke_jrock/Dir_en_Grey/Dir_en_Grey_Die_s.jpg http://i322.photobucket.com/albums/nn402/kaitojrock/die.jpg http://cdimg3.crunchyroll.com/i/spire2/08102008/7/3/9/7/7397443cec7b30_full.jpg http://notgreatestsite.net/gallery/deg/scans/Vicious_5-99_Die_01.jpg

Mana from Moi Dix Mois.

http://www.spirit-of-metal.com/membre_groupe/photo/Mana-2771.jpg http://jrockrae.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/manamoidixmois.jpg http://dl7.glitter-graphics.net/pub/607/607097aozhrg5o7j.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v219/killerclaw/Jrock/j-lol/manalol1.jpg http://www.ld50.hu/res/user_images/002/955/mana-sama.jpg http://fs1.us.cyworld.com/data2/2007/08/26/197/1188153997229352_file.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.160.77.255 (talk) 23:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Whether there are similarities or not, without Bill saying himself (published by a few reliable sources) that he is emulating Die and/or Mana, it cannot go in the article as it is purely original research and not clear cut fact. AngelOfSadness talk 21:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

They were interviewed by the Japanese Visual kei magazine Cure. They article mentions the visual kei boom overseas and debates if Tokio Hotel should be considered vk or not. Tokio Hotel admits to being influenced by Japanese style, but when asked about their band influences they list a different band for each mamber (Iyeroo Kado?), Metallica, Hip Hop, and Green Day. No Japanese bands are listed as an influence. (Cure Magazine, July 2006 issue, Vol 34, Issued May 21, 2006) Scan links if someone would like to double check my summary: http://good-tokio-hotel.blog.cz/0804/cure-magazine-japanese Denaar (talk) 07:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

But with the link you provided, only people who can read Japanese can verify if the band are influenced by Japanese style, everyone else wishing to verify that content themselves would be relying on a translation of some sort. And then there are contradictions to this as apparently Bill said back in 2005 that his style was not influenced by Manga as the media was stating and only learned about it's existance because interviewers were asking him if he was influenced by it. Here's an interview where he says he never heard of anime (sixth main paragraph). There are other interviews where he says this but it'll take me a while to find them as they are probably all in German. So whether they have been influenced or not is something that is not that well known, and if it's a fact that's not that well known does it really belong in the article in the first place? True, there are many articles about them saying their style is Japanese inspired but they haven't exactly said it themselves to the point where it is a well known fact. They could have just been infuenced by aspects of japanese culture and so named the band after Tokyo and recorded the debut single in Japanese (chorus only) but is that enough to say they have been influenced by Japanese style aswell. Either way, uncertainty doesn't belong in the article as in the article itself should be uncertain about what is fact from fiction. AngelOfSadness talk 16:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh you can use foreign language sources - a huge chunk of wikipedia about non-english speaking countries couldn't exist without them. Check out the sources on the visual kei page, it is almost all Japanese because the English language sources are so poor and full of errors. If you can find a reliable English language source, you always use that first. I think this is a good article, and probably the only reliable source you will find questioning if they are a visual band. When you search for information on Tokio Hotel you are constantly coming across the question "Is Tokio Hotel Visual kei". It is on their youtube pages, fan sites, discussion boards, blogs - everywhere. Its being talked about enough that I think it is our duty to look for reliable sources to answer that question. Denaar (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

I know we can use foreign language sources, sure half the sources in this article are in foreign languages, German mostly. Do you know if there is a translation of the article you cited? It might provide more infomation that could help flesh out this article a bit as it might have more info that may not have been covered in more recent interviews.

But, either way, we are going to need more than one source to cover influences especially if the source is not in English and is that this is the only source that reports this. I actually have an article from German music magazine, Yam!, about J-Rock bands and why groups like Cinema Bizarre and Tokio Hotel aren't considered to be Visual Kei at all but are merely copying J-Rock bands in the eyes of Visual Kei fans. If we find some more sources about influences, we could add, I guess, the media/public perspective on whether they are influenced by Visual Kei. But the problem is the lack of sources and the fact that this influence is debated especially amongst the band themselves as we can see already there are interviews contradicting each other. But if we can only find content which contradicts other known content, how will we go about writing a paragraph about uncertainty?

Also if we add such a paragraph, it could lead to fans to remove parts of the paragraph depending on their POV. Also Visual Kei was one of the genres in the infobox about a year (?) back becuase of the look of the band but no matter how much it was sourced, people(mainly anon editors) would still remove it without any discussion leading to a whole load of revert wars. So one does have to think of the effect that putting such a paragraph in could cause, seeing as we saw what two words caused. And it happened because it was and still is debated because some people think they are Visual Kei and VK fans don't think so. But this is merely food for thought, I'm not against putting in the paragraph except if it's not neutral and is not backed-up by multiple reliable sources because such a paragraph can be prone to original research/ unsourced POVs, so one has to be careful and only put cited fact into it and nothing else. AngelOfSadness talk 18:49, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel Emo

Considering the content of the lyrics and the fashion-style of Tokio Hotel, they aren't a glam-rock-type band. Emo would be the more appropiate Term. 89.53.122.145 18:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

it's grindcore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.49.191.119 (talk) 13:33, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

But seeing as the band doesn't consider them punk or emo(They have said this in many interviews), it would be inappropriate to mark the article as such. AngelOfSadness talk 23:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

They have far more in common with glam rock and visual kei, i can't see much to do with emo in their music. --Neon white 23:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

They are desbribed as glam or glam rock on enough sites to have it in the article. [7][8][9][10][11] [12]--Neon white (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Neon white. And in Germany there are enough sources (in German only) which prove that Tokio Hotel themselves have always stated that glam rock is part of their musical identity. --Fromgermany (talk) 16:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

I concur, there is nothing "Emo" about their music at all. Alternative rock would be the most neutral description, even though they say they're influenced by Glam Rock and Visual Kei (though thats a whole different topic, as a lot of people debate if VK is actually a sound or just style). They don't sound anything like Dashboard Confessional, Jimmy Eat World, or any of the other so called "Third-Wave" Emo bands out there. Modern emo kids hijacking other subculture fashion doesn't make other subcultures emo. JanderVK (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I think that callin them "Glam Rock" would be a shame to real glam rock bands. It's my opinion, feel free to blame me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.7.101.48 (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

They are not emo because emo is a subegenre of hardcore punk and tokio hotel has no hardcore influences —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackblackerblackst (talk • contribs) 19:23, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

That may or may not be but there are many reliable sources saying Emo and with genre debates we can only really go with verified facts not opinions or otherwise. I personally don't think they're Emo but it seems mtv proves my ideas wrong(original source was going to be allmusic guide but for some reason that website isn't working for me at the moment). AngelOfSadness talk 19:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

What about New Age Emo? You have to take their lyrics and themes into consideration. (Anonymous1)

Tho Tokio Hotel Isnt Really That Emo, right?!?!?!?!?

Their lyrics are pretty Emo, but it's not like the stereotypical Emo music out there. It's more of a New style or New Age-ish. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it being Emo though. It's just lyric poetry (which is what music is anyway), but Tokio Hotel has captured a sweeter/truer form of it. . .(Anonymous1)

Tokio Hotel isn't emo. They're German Rock and not Emo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Katie1865 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I really lauged when I saw that wikipedia classified TH as emo. Thats pathetic. Its rock/pop! Just listen to some real emo and you will hear the difference! /Vincent, 9/6 08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.192.112 (talk) 22:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel Aren't Glam Band!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.61.60.53 (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Why is Tokio Hotel considered "Emo"? Because of the way they look? It should be removed. Having just one source being an article written by someone else isn't good enough to me. Unless they specifically say so themselves, we shouldn't put that as their genre.

NewYorkStyledCheesecakes (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree, I believe Emo is a phony, made up genre to massively categorize bands that one person doesn't like so everyone else can hate them, too, without actually listening to their music. Real emo is a genre called Emocore, or Emotive Hardcore (I'd link this to its page, too, but unfortunately, it links to Emo, which, in my opinion, is terrible.), and it actually has a lot more in common with Hardcore punk. What most people consider Emo is actually just Pop rock, Pop punk, or anything related. I don't believe lyrical content should be the only decisive factor in determining a genre, either. I say take the listing of the band as "Emo" off, and replace it with Glam rock, maybe with Pop rock as a secondary genre. If you don't believe they fit the description of "Glam rock", then look at the page for Glam rock here on Wikipedia, because that description seems to fit them perfectly to me. - J-Whitt (talk) 04:08, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes..Emo! Liricaly they are emo...they are referenced among the emo movement.....sources cite them as emo.....visualy they are kind of a mix between emo fashion and visual key....look at the singer! He is the perfect examle of the mix between emo, visual key and kind of an androginous look! As for the rest I like theyr music. --Horror Punk Ed (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

fuck...you don't know what are you talking about...emo movement isn't this shit

THIS BAND IS POP. THE END. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.179.24 (talk) 01:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Taking into account the page ON WIKIPEDIA ITSELF that defines emo, there should be a general consensus that they are not emo in any way shape or form. Their music is not "emotional-hardcore" and as such should not be defined emo because of the fact that they wear an unusual amount of black and look a little creepy. People are labeling them emo just because of what they choose to look like, it's a bunch of scene kids in a band, that doesn't make them play emo music, it's an actual genre. Gellister (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

okay as for the one person who said that they're grindcore... what the heck?! were'd that come from?! they are NO where NEAR grindcore. and they are classified as german rock. get it through your heads. not rock, pop, metal and NOT emo. they're lyrics ARE emotional so you COULD say the words are emo. i guess but they don't classify themselves as that. and with good reason. they aren't they are german rock. that is what they call themselves. different countries have different ways to classify a type of music and tokio hotel is classified as german rock. okay?! do you get it? end of disscusion!Billismine89 (talk) 04:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Discussion isn't exactly ended considering sources are needed in order to add German rock to the article. Also it doesn't matter what Wikipedia editors think (remember that this isn't a forum to generally discuss the band), if it's sourced reasonably then it goes in the article. Tokio Hotel are considered Pop, Rock, Emo etc., etc, by respectable music critics (like those from Rolling Stone and Billboard magazines) and whether we agree with it or not, those genres go in the article as they are 1.) easily sourced and 2.) can cover a broad amount the media's perspective of the band's sound. Also very seldom has the band's own opinion on their sound taken in to account for Wikipedia genres (in the infobox at least)..look at the My Chemical Romance and Panic at the Disco articles for example, both mention Emo as one of the genres (and have sources to back that up) despite it being well known that neither band agree the genre applies to them. So, in short, if you want the genres to change, chalk up the reliable sources for the change/addition you want to make and take it here. If you are completely against a genre, find sources which contradict that Tokio Hotel are part of a certain genre and bring it here to discuss. There is really no point shouting at one another about what genre is right or not as progress can't be made with something that is as opinion based as genre. AngelOfSadness talk 18:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Miming

<removed copyvio> -From Perezhilton.com, will be sourced on page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.115.128.45 (talk) 03:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, Perez Hilton is a blogger (as said on his Wikipedia page) and blogs are not reliable sources on Wikipedia so unless a respected and reliable news organisation reports on it, it won't go in the article. Futhermore bild.de has quoted the band's manager, David Jost, as saying the band has been playing live (not miming) and that "the band have been working their asses off for the last year" (see here for bild.de article). Bild.de is a well known German newspaper and I'm inclined to think it's a lot more reliable than any blog. AngelOfSadness talk 19:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Genre

The Genre field in the infobox is no longer visible, so the genre(s) need(s) to be added in the article (if wanted). BNutzer (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

• I would say, we need a description of their style rather than a strict categorisation. Smth. like "TH music features melodic hooks, occasional hard guitar riffs", etc. If categorisation is really needed, Pop rock would be the proper and compromise definition. Garret Beaumain (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Guidelines suggest doing that but it has to be based on sources not personal views. --neon white talk 20:15, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

If we do go for generalisation with a genre paragraph in the article itself, once it is done it'll have to watched very carefully as those sections can be prone to the personal view edits e.g. fans/non-fans removing what they like because the don't agree with it etc. Maybe putting a hidden notice at the beginning of the section could help like a warning saying unsourced additions will be removed etc. But apart from that I see no other problems with it. AngelOfSadness talk 15:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

That's the reason it was removed from the template, isn't it? Putting a genre in the prose just encourages the same kind of edit wars. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 19:04, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

It was the reason but for some reason or another it was restored. Putting genre anywhere in the article encourages edit wars but moreso the infobox given it's one of the first things you see when the page opens. A paragraph nearer the end of the page shouldn't gather as much attention seeing as one has to scroll the page down to see it but that doesn't mean it won't be edit warred upon. AngelOfSadness talk 19:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Sources for Pop Rock

I think it is enough sources that classify them as pop rock:

1. From Frankfurter Rundschau (a great article with analyze of band's music and origins of popularity)

Straightforward pop-rock with catchy melodies and a well-calculated mix of stolen Metallica riffs and romantic ballad elements. Everything is played on the safe side, and the production is technically perfect.

2. MTV news:[13]

For a while, Tokio Hotel were like David Hasselhoff — they were only big in Germany. But after the pop-rock quartet released their debut English-language disc Scream last year (here in the States, the set will be released May 6), they gained many a fan (and could very well surpass the ‘Hoff in global popularity).

3. ABC follows[14]:

A winning combination of lyrics laced with "emo" angst, wrapped in a flamboyant pop-rock package. It's PG-rated but still edgy enough for younger fans. Songs range from catchy pop anthems to anti-suicide messages to appealing rock ballads.

Garret Beaumain (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

The MTV source isnt a news article it's a blog, i'm not sure about it's verifiability. Use one of the others. --neon white talk 17:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

ok they are not pop in germany they are know as rock but no one can see that because everyone calles them pop here in the us so really get to know these things beforhand plz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.119.25.154 (talk) 17:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

they are not pop they are rock in germany they are rock pop is like backstreet boys and things like that i have almost all the albums and even the german ones but people need to know more about them befor you call them pop AND NOI BILL IS NOT GAY HE IS SEXY thank you very much —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.119.25.154 (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

VMA 2008

tokio hotel has been nominated at the 2008 VMA music video awards for best new artist in America, they brought home the trophie! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.210.49.57 (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

That's already in the article, see #Awards and #United States tours and 3rd studio album. --Amalthea 08:34, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Emo

This is pop/rock. Compare this to Moss Icon or Indian Summer and see the difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.210.87.80 (talk) 23:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC) It's certainly NOT glam rock. T. Rex is glam rock. Don't insult the genre. Kindly remove it --Kitrina192 (talk) 04:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thats true.. Tokio Hotel isnt Glam Rock or Emo, its just pop —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.236.146.53 (talk) 14:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

TOKIO HOTEL IS NOT THE EMO OR GLAM ROCK! Thats true! [removed] is not the to emo! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.2.74 (talk) 21:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

THEY ARE ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!

pop-rock....not glam metal, not emo, not punk.

moss icon _____' rocks....haha.

Get, this band is POP. Not emo, not glam rock, but POP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.94.179.24 (talk) 01:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

IT IS POP ROCK NOT EMO OR GLAM ROCK.. some people are messed up

La4hi (talk) 01:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Genres of bands are determined on reliable sources not the individual opinions of editors. We have several reliable sources which back up Glam Rock and Emo which are two genres that the band are said to be by respected music publications (Rolling Stone and MTV anyone?). Therefore pop-rock, rock, pop or whatever genre can't go in the article without a reliable source as has been said multiple times in the Tokio Hotel Emo, The Genres of Tokio Hotel require changes, Not this genre, Emo!??!? what the fuck??? and the second half of the The lead paragraph discussion sections on this very talkpage. Seeing as those who wanted to put Glam Rock and Emo in the article went ahead and sourced the genres themselves and discussed it here so the changes could happen, it is really only fair that those wanting to put whatever other genre in the infobox do the same. Sound fair? AngelOfSadness talk 18:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

First of all Tokio Hotel has no specific genre. Everyone has their own definition of what genre they are. But emo should not be one. People should not judge the band by the looks. As Tom Kaulitz said "I would describe it as perfect rock music." If any you actually know this then you would know that Tokio Hotel's music is more rock/alternative. (Can't.be.saved (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC))

Tokio HOtel is tottaly pop-rock!!!! this whole emo thing just encourages people to make fun of them!!!! *sigh*

....AND 'Oriental'

Someone needs to remove these!!

what does "Oriental" even have to do with Tokio Hotel?!?! it's ridiculous!(Can't.be.saved (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2009 (UTC))

Georg

Seeing as this thing is semi-protected, someone needs to add in the little bit about Georg being the oldest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.158.131 (talk) 02:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

The birth dates are already in it. Where exactly do you want to change what? --Amalthea 08:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

I think that there needs to be more information on all of the guys especially Georg. Even Gustav has stuff about his musical interests in there,so there should be something in there that says that he likes Fall Out Boy. Some more details on all the members would be nice. (Can't.be.saved (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC))

Is Bill gay?

It's possible for Bill Kaulitz to be gay and once stated that he was gay in an interview (although he was drunk at the time). He denys this saying that "he was just joking around". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onerace (talk • contribs) 23:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Well, in any case we'd need a highly reliable third-party source saying so. Biographies of living persons are a very sensitive matter. --Amalthea^Talk 00:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't recall any such interview taking place but I do recall him saying numerous times that he isn't. The latter can be reliably sourced with numerous references, the former I can't even verify with sources let alone reliable ones. The topic is only disputed in rumour mills. Taking that into consideration, it needs no mention in the article. AngelOfSadness talk 19:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

If only we could source Wikipedia vandals! Yes, unless he actually says "I am gay" and it is on record, or is photographed doing certain stuff with another guy (and even then it'd be dubious), we can't put it, not even if his dear old mother says "my son is gay". ;) Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 02:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

There is an actual statement where he says that he is not gay. "Bill is not gay". Retrieved 2008-11-14. (in German)--Panic!out^{U've Been Discoed!} 21:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

That video the first commenter is talking about was a parody-type deal. I can't find the link.  :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.72.25.210 (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

ok bill is not gay people get that in your thik skulls!! he has said so many a times in iterviews except for the drunk one!! but the matter is HE ISNT GAY!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.6.216.195 (talk) 01:46, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

"Edgy Hair"

This is pretty funny, but really. It needs to be changed. Bad. I mean, seriously, edgy? His hair is EDGY? Like there are old Christians at home turning off the TV because of his hair. "Oh my God, his hair! We can't have hair like that!" It's not edgy, it just makes him look like a girl. Fiiiix that! Amedeus (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

• That description is directly taken from the reference

  [...] playing on the singer's androgynous look, the band members' young ages and edgy hairstyles [...]

  — http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,3626595,00.html

  Do you have a better word for his hairstyle? I wouldn't want to bore it down and call it "unusual" or something, and it is unusual enough to warrant a mention. Amalthea 22:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

If pressed, I would probably have to go with "lionesque". Amedeus (talk) 07:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

But see "lionesque" would warrant a source just like "edgy" has a source as both are views that are debatable for some reason. Views without sources are just the opinions of editors which is a no go and only what's verifiable is edited into the page hence why "edgy" is currently in the article. AngelOfSadness talk 20:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, but "edgy" is just a terrible description. If I had an official link describing it as "feminine", you wouldn't go with that, would you? No, you would all be up in arms about the very implication. A description of hair. Does that REALLY need a source? Just say "big" hair, if you need to. But really. Lenny Bruce was edgy. George Carlin was edgy. If you can find a good way to equate this hair to either of these fine gentlemen, then I'm sold and will argue this no more. Until then, there's a lie on this page and on Wikipedia that just can't stand. Amedeus (talk) 07:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

The problem with the article was not the inclusion of such terms, it's that opinions need to be attributed to the sources not stated as facts (Wikipedia:NPOV#A simple formulation). I have fixed this to make it clear that it is an opinion of a website. Please remember that wikipedia does not claim to represent the 'truth' so nothing is a lie. --neon white talk 17:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Well that's kind of backwards, isn't it? With all the sources needed and vandalism being cut out, it should seem obvious to anyone that they care about this being as true as possible. An encyclopedia IS essentially a dictionary of truth. Amedeus (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is about what is verifiable not the truth so yes sources are needed I'm afraid. And you can argue this all you like but it won't change the fact that sources are especially needed for opinions like this because it is material which is debatable. AngelOfSadness talk 21:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Um, should his hair even matter that much? I don't think that's what he built his career on, so to incorporate the "edginess" of his hair, even with sources in the article would probably violate POV. --Whip it! ^{Now whip it good!} 06:25, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

The source above says that part of their popularity is owed to the look of the singer. --Amalthea 12:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, sorry about that. I didn't bother reading the source because I noticed the server was based in Germany and therefore (wrongfully and stupidly) concluded the article is in German. --Whip it! ^{Now whip it good!} 06:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

redirection

if you search "devilish" you will be redirected to this page, but what about the original orginal name, "black question mark?" this should redirect you to this page as well, can somebody do this? 75.148.90.125 (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

That's was a project of the twins, only revealed in a recent DVD interview. It hasn't been covered that much in the media unlike Devilish which has been brought up in (probably) hundreds of interviews of the years. They released music under the name Devilish and it is mentioned in the article. They haven't released music under Black Questionmark nor is it a well known name connected to the band. It wasn't exactly how Devilish is to Tokio Hotel as Gustav and Georg weren't involved in Black Questionmark. So it would be inappropraite to create a redirect to this article for these reasons and that Black Questionmark isn't even mentioned in this article to begin with. When an article is redirected there is usually has an explanation of what it is and it's relation to the target subject at it's target page - but if there's no mention of the name to begin with in the target article there really isn't a need to create a redirect for such a minor project. AngelOfSadness talk 22:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Twins

Tokio Hotel Bill Kaulitz was born 10 min. before Tom,not Bill was born 10 min. after Tom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.234.39.28 (talk) 22:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Kaulitz Twins: Bill Kaulitz was born 10 min. before Tom,not Bill Kaulitz was born after Tom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.234.39.28 (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Tom Kaulitz was born 10 minutes before Bill Kaulitz. Tom frequently brags in interviews about being the 'first' to accomplish everything between the two, including having the first kiss and having the first girlfriend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gossipgirlo9 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Parodies

There are many parodies inspired by successful songs of Tokio Hotel:

• Parody CD Cover
• Another Video Parody
• video parody Gymmicks - Durch den Konsum
• Video Parody Durch den Konsum

--Noebse (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

And there are literally hundreds of notable parodies inspired by the songs of Shakira yet none of them are taking up the EL section of her page as they are not important to her actual biography page. They are not important links that are directly assosicated with the artist in question hence adding them to the EL section falls under spam as they are indirectly associated with the subject of the article. That why I removed the links from this article per WP:EL (links to be avoided: Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject) AngelOfSadness talk 12:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

mtv hottest man

Bill Kaulitz was made hottest man alive number 6 in 2008 because of his pointy hair —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.76.63 (talk) 00:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

It's already in the article probably since December when that poll was released. AngelOfSadness talk 16:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

People Keep Saying...

People keep saying there needs to be more information on the band so I'm just gonna put some here:

Tokio Hotel started off as Develish which consisted of Bill and Tom Kaultiz who are identical twin brothers, they were performing a gig and afterwards they met Georg Listing and Gustav Schafer who were already friends and they decided to join the band. In 2003 Bill went on 'Search For A Star' and sang 'It's rainin' men' (Gustav's choice xD) and lost in the semi-final, although he lost this brought some publicity to the band and they were approached, they changed their name to Tokio Hotel, Tokio (or Tokyo as the english spelling) because they like the lively city and Hotel because of their constant staying in Hotels.

Bill Kaulitz: Birthday: 1st September 1980 Music: David Bowie, Nena, Placebo, Green Day, Coldplay Known for: His hair, eyeliner and nails Siblings: Identical twin brother, Tom In The Band: Sings Favourite food: Pizza Favourite Drink: Redbull or coke Other information: Despite constant rumours, he's not gay. He's 6'2". He has his right eyebrow and his tongue pierced.

Tom Kaulitz: Birthday:1st September 1989 Music: Aerosmith, Samy Deluxe Known for: Dreadlocks and baggy clothes Siblings:Identical twin brother, Bill In The Band: Plays guitar Favourite food: Pasta Favourite drink: Coke Other information: He likes parties, pretty girls and has his lip pierced.

Georg Listing Birthday: 31st March 1986 Music: Red Hot Chili Peppers Siblings: none In The Band: Bass Guitar Favourite food: Burger king Favourite drink: -- Other information:

Gustav Schafer: Birthday: 8th September 1988 Music: Metallica, Siblings: A sister In The Band: Drums Favourite food: -- Favourite drink: -- Other information: Shy

Albums: Schrei Schrei So Laut Du Kannst (the same as schrei but recorded after bill's voice broke) Zimmer 483 3rd Album Release in September

Hope I helped!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.79.165 (talk) 15:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Birthdays, album names, what each member does in the band, the names of the band members and sourcable music influences are already in the article. Things like favourite food, drink and other trivia does not belong in the article as it is exactly that: trivia. You wouldn't find trivia like that in a paper encyclopedic article so there is no reason to put it here. Really that sort of trivia belongs more in a fansite than an online encyclopidia. Having it in there doesn't help the article make sense as stuff like favourite drink or that Georg straightens his hair everyday didn't exactly have a big affect on the band's career hence it is not needed. AngelOfSadness talk 16:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Devilish?

So I wound up on this page through redirect when I was looking for information on Devilish. Not related to Tokio Hotel, but rather the Megadrive game by that name. At first I assumed that since "Devilish" redirected here, there was no information on the game Devilish, but then I found Devilish: Ball Bounder. It even has a link that should go to a game about the megadrive game, but rather sends a user here instead. Could a page for the game be created and then have a disambiguation page that allows users to reach whichever one they were really looking for? 76.123.112.144 (talk) 17:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel Sound....

{{editsemiprotected}} - It is requested that an edit be made to this semi-protected article. Please change "mix of "stolen" Metallica riffs" to "mix of "borrowed" Metallica riffs"

 Not done per this. Is there a special reason for the change? Tim Song (talk) 05:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Simplifying genre

Like many popular bands, Tokio Hotel seem to be in constant genre wars. I have my own opinions of course, but I'm not going to take sides. According to "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Musical_artist#Genre" genre should be simplified as possible. Should it be more specific as to simply label them a "pop rock" group since no one seems to be happy with anything else, taking it down to the basics should make it less messy and more "agreeable" and "citable" to everyone. If no one disagrees, I'll tackle this later. Andrzejbanas (talk) 09:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

But the only problem to just having Pop Rock is that it doesn't cover the other Emo and Glam Rock aspects that the band have been known to have incorporated into their sound. The other genres can't just be disguarded as, in fairness, there are much more music publications (judging by the amount of reviews etc on the net that I've read) that refer to the band as being Glam Rock and Emo than Pop Rock. Pop Rock can't really be used as an umbrella term for the other genres as the other genres didn't arise out of Pop Rock. If we were to make it general I'd say have it Rock - easy to verify, umbrella term to cover evrything etc. but even with that people tend to disagree. AngelOfSadness talk 20:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Glam rock and Emo are a little more precise since many people confuse glam rock and glam metal and I'm sure we've all seen countless debates over what is and isn't emo. To avoid edit wars, changing to Rock music would be the easiest route to go. It can be discussed in the article with citations of how their style of rock is played. The infobox is just to get a better idea of what can music they play so you don't think they are R&B or and Electronic band or something far off. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

=)) HIII

In my opinion, Tokio Hotel's genre is pop rock, or simply rock. FrauKaulitz93 (talk) 10:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

On returning to the subject...I'm certain this has been brought up before but I don't believe Tokio Hotel fit into this category other then visually. On researching up the musical style of glam rock, i've found citations stating it as a "stripped down but highly produced style of rock"Source and "Glam rock was fairly simple, crunchy guitar rock put across with outrageous theatricality"source. Both sources, and various google searches name several groups such as David Bowie, T. Rex, and Roxy Music as glam rock and with this definition of the genre, I can understand the style. Listening to the music of Tokio Hotel, I do not hear the stripped down rock elements or crunch guitar rock. Despite the citations, I think the group only has some visual elements of the style down. As genre should be more representative about the music, I believe "glam rock" should be removed. What does anyone else think? Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

As no one has responded to the genre information, I'll be removing glam rock from the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Curiosities

Since 2007, he has been related sentimentally to Monica Sanz, Spanish supermodel and singer known as “The Goddess”. They have not recognized it yet, even Monica Sanz denied knowing him but, their dates, some information and some testimonies from fans of the musician, increase the possibilities. International press confirmed the relationship with no word from them, but the fact it is that the fans of Tokio Hotel, in opposition to they have done with other girls before, support the relationship between them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferr89 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

And yet none of the "International press" that you speak of are considered reliable as I've read this "story" many times myself in multiple sources over the years yet none of those sources are known for being reliable in verfiable truth. Unless some very reliable sources confirm their rumoured relationship (I haven't seen any acceptable reliable sources yet which have), it is not going in the article as it is merely a rumour especially considering Monica Sanz herself is denying the said relationship. AngelOfSadness talk 19:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Again I'm going to remove the content about the alleged relationship between Monica Sanz and Bill as all sources are unsuitable and here's why:

• Source one: http://hjoven.hola.com/musica/2008/04/-los-continuos-rumores-sobre.html is a blog - user generated posts with only usernames to cover authors of said post conclude it is a blog which is not allowed per Wikipedia:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided (point #11) as it is not a reliable source. Also the source only backs up that there is rumours and Wikipedia is not for reporting ever rumour on the internet.
• Source two: http://www.mtv.es/clubmtv/tokiohotelera89/2008/4/19/bill-kaulitz-y-monica-sanz- is a blog - it says at the title of the page that is so and again is not allowed to be used as a source.
• Source three: http://listas.20minutos.es/?do=show&id=20186 is a user generated list (notice the "Iniciar sesión | Regístrate aquí" at the right hand of the page which translates to login|register here) hence is the same as a blog.
• Source four: http://www.tokiohotelrocks.com/2008/06/01/bill-kaulitz-in-love-with-a-spanish-model/ is a fansite which is not allowed per Wikipedia:EL#Links_normally_to_be_avoided (point #11) also.
• Source five: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4FmkWJxCS8M/SBRq4f7KZuI/AAAAAAAABng/KnDI7pm3FdU/s400/coure.jpg was posted by a blog and the image is so small, I can't see what magazine its supposed to be and how to determine the reliable nature of the magazine. Also as it is a scan of an article - it may be considered a link to a copyvio as it is not known whether the blogger got permission to post the scan on their blog. And so it cannot be used as a source.

What I'm trying to say here is simple: Wikipedia is not for rumours about the private lives of subjects in articles. Putting rumours in articles and sourcing them with extemely unreliable sources risks being a BLP violation as stated:

"Biographies of living persons must be written conservatively, with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid paper; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives. The possibility of harm to living subjects is one of the important factors to be considered when exercising editorial judgment"

Therefore unless reliable sources begin to confirm the relationship not the rumours of a relationship, it stays out of the article as the content is only discussing rumour and nothing else. There are far more notable rumours surrounding the band that are not in the article for the exact same reasons. Please understand that I'm not doing this because I don't want this content in the article because I don't like it or something but instead because it is all based on rumour that is incredibly sensationalist and I'm thinking of the legal ramifications that such content could cause if left in the article. AngelOfSadness talk 20:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Teen pop?

Why the hell is "teen pop" listed under Tokio Hotel's genres? Just because they are teens and that they are popular does not make them "teen pop". Teen pop are artists like Miley Cyrus but certainly not Tokio Hotel. Pop artists are artists like Britney Spears and Lady GaGa. I would rather just state them simply as rock. Mcrfobrockr (talk) 02:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

It's reliably sourced and there are many other sources which can be used to back it up and as so many sources (like Music publications etc.) do say they are "Teen Pop" it included in the article for the same reasons that "rock", "pop rock" and "emo" are in the article. Because you don't agree with the genre that by itself isn't exactly grounds for removal. Like I personally don't think they are either "Teen pop" or "Emo" for that matter but I haven't removed them as the genres are not based on the opinions of individual editors but on the opinions of those given in reputable and reliable music publications (like opinions found in reviews and articles). AngelOfSadness talk 19:54, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

FHM

"In August 2008, Bill Kaulitz was chosen as the most attractive singer on stage by the readers of the Spanish magazine ¡Hola!.[42]

Bill was immortalized in wax at the Madame Tussauds museum in Berlin. His wax statue was unveiled on September 30, 2008. At 19 years old, Bill became the youngest person to be duplicated by the Madame Tussauds museum in Berlin.[43][44]

In December 2008, Bill Kaulitz was named "Man of the Year #6" by MTV News. [45]"

If all this is considered as usefull information, please let someone add the fact that Bill was elected 27th in the FHM-organised poll "100 Unsexiest Women Alive" in 2007 and 30th in 2009 by it's readers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.159.97.4 (talk) 12:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

That picture.

A new picture really is nedded, this one's not relevent anymore, their not that age anymore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.209.111.158 (talk) 03:21, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Tokio Hotel collage.jpg

Bill Kaulitz • Tom Kaulitz
Georg Listing • Gustav Schäfer

Really - the picture on this article is a joke. It's a big black block with 4 dots that are the band. Just take it down. It's one of the most pathetic pictures I've seen on all wikipedia.

--Kyanwan (talk) 00:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree. How about this one? It's not great, but certainly better. --Amalthea^Talk 00:55, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree too. The other picture is up there because other people would put up non-free content pictures, which were then either deleted or replaced by existing live pictures. For a while it was of this live picture but then other editors felt the band, rather than just Bill and Georg, should be in the picure therefore leading to the current picture as it technically had all four members of the band in it. But go right ahead and add this new one. I'm glad that at least we gave a picture that represents all members fairly clearly and is a free image. As for the tag, we could also do something like; "Clockwise from top: Bill Kaulitz, Tom Kaulitz, Georg Listing and Gustav Schäfer" like what was done for the Nightwish article. But either way is fine. AngelOfSadness talk 17:08, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Done, but I left the caption as it was, I found it a bit easier to match picture to name as long as the names are reasonably short to fit into neat rows (with most browser setups). But I won't mind if anyone ever changes it. --Amalthea^Talk 20:14, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Actually, now that you mention it, it is a lot easier to read so I won't be changing it. AngelOfSadness talk 20:26, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

This new picture isn't any good either!!! They are all different ages in that picture. It makes no sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.115.55.36 (talk) 02:30, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately it's the only free (as in that complies with WP:COPYRIGHTS) image that depicts all four members clearly. None of the other free images depicted all four members in the same picture or if all four were in the picture the image wouldn't be clear enough to identify each member. It's also unfortunate that we can't use any ol' image like a fansite can because Wikipedia takes copyrighted materials very seriously and so we have to work with what we had which was four free images of the each member made into one. AngelOfSadness talk 02:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Supposedly free, at least. Since two of the pictures used turned out to be copyvios though it's gone now. We don't have any other usable pictures to replace them, so we could either go back to one of the three ridiculously useless live image found at commons:Tokio Hotel, could use only an image of Bill Kaulitz, or could use the logo de:File:TokioHotelLogo.jpg if someone sees an encyclopaedic reason to allow it, per our WP:NFCC.
From those options, I prefer not having an image at all at this point. --Amalthea 11:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree what's left on commons isn't great and the whole adding in the logo bit has been tried and has failed miserably on many other band articles (even band logos that would be a lot more notable than the Tokio Hotel one) so I'm not exactly looking forward to a repeat of that debate here. If a better and free image comes along great but until then it's best to leave the image box blank. AngelOfSadness talk 17:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The latest picture is the worst yet!! The black one wit Tokio Hotel on stage. Put up a proper one!! Try Google images or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrauKaulitz93 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

By default, all pictures found on google image search are copyrighted and can not be used on Wikipedia. Unless you own copyright to a decent picture (as in, have taken one yourself) or find one with a free license (e.g. GFDL, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA, public domain) there's not much that can currently be done. --Amalthea 13:26, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Now there's the red one up again(!) The best pic that's been up is the one with a small pic of each of the band members. Whoever has that, put it up again!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by FrauKaulitz93 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The new picture is PERFECT. Please don't change it! FrauKaulitz93 (talk) 10:14, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Language

The article should be revised in respect to the use of the English language. As I'm not a native speaker myself, I will leave this to more competent users. ;) E.g., "it was revealed that the mini-concert would be existing out of 6 songs," sounds like a word by word translation from German. Maybe I'm wrong; no offense intended, anyway. --93.104.59.250 (talk) 14:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

No you're not wrong the language did need improvement. I fixed up what I could (in the section you mentioned as the rest of the article was ok), fixed tenses (some things weren't updated since they were added in the summer) and removed content that is just trivia now. Thanks for the heads-up. AngelOfSadness talk 20:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

I like llamas!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.54.86.249 (talk) 19:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 

Separate pages

Are Tokio Hotel not well-known enough for individual pages to also be made for each band member, or at least for Bill? I personally think individual pages should also be made alongside the band page. 99.239.176.33 (talk) 22:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

This has been discussed before and as all Bill is known for (besides being the frontman of Tokio Hotel) is being the German voiceover in Arthur and the Minimoys, as with that previous discussion, that isn't enough notability to warrant an entire article without it turning into a fanpage replica with random trivia comprising 99% of it. Same goes for the other members to I'm afraid. Besides any useful information is in the main article under Band Members and anyone can see that those would be stubs if they were their own articles so there's also that to take into account. AngelOfSadness talk 23:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Well It seems kinda odd to have a singer known worldwide, im not sure about the rest but Bill certainly has the notability as the singer of an international band and a main idol of many fans.Hell he was even immortalized as a wax figure, hell even that basically warrants an article, it seems very odd for me..--77.213.191.134 (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC) Well, someone made a Bill Kaulitz page. I only just joined, and the main Tokio Hotel article is protected, so could someone add this under the subsection for Bill for me?

For more info, see Bill Kaulitz.

Much appreciated, I'd do it myself, but, again, the article is protected. ILeftMyHeartInTokio (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Tokio Hotel#Bill Kaulitz vs. Bill Kaulitz

Now that the separate article Bill Kaulitz exists, to me, the section Tokio Hotel#Bill Kaulitz appears unnecessarily full of details which (if needed at all) should rather go into the separate article, IMHO. BNutzer (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

A lot of it is actually useful for establishing a "Public image" section on the Bill Kaulitz page. And so all the content that was in the Band member section was moved to the new page and the Bill section on this page now contains just a link to the new page. AngelOfSadness talk 21:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Pictures of the band

I would highly appreciate at least one picture of the band and/or the other band members in the article instead of more than one of Bill. BNutzer (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Well if you look at commons (which hold the extent of the free images of Tokio Hotel) you will see that there are no images with the entire band except this but it isn't the best quality. You can add images to the article if you want as long as they're free images. AngelOfSadness talk 20:53, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Genre (again)

Someone has been changing the genre entry in the infobox to Alternative Rock by simply overwriting the previous entry Rock. Both references (|1 and 2) used for the former Rock are still in place and do not even contain the word "alternative", I will revert the change in a minute. The genre discussion has been going on here for a long time, see i.e. Talk:Tokio_Hotel/Archive_1#The_Genres_of_Tokio_Hotel_require_changes.: Wikipedia is based on verifiable sources not personal opinions.So, please do not add genres that you personally would like for the band and do not simply remove the ones you don't agree with, but instead, use genres that can be verified via sources, and reference them appropriately. BNutzer (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Awards

• 2005*

- Comet 2005 : Best Newcomer (6.10.2005) - Comet 2005 : Supercomet (6.10.2005) - Eins Live Krone: Best Newcomer (24.11.2005) - Bambi Awards: Best Pop National Act (1.12.2005 - Golden Penguin: Best Single (..2005) - Golden Penguin: Best Pop/Rock Band 2005 (..2005)

• 2006*

- ECHO Awards: Best Newcomer (12.03.2006) - Steiger Awards: Best Newcomer (25.03.2006) - BRAVO Otto: Best Band Rock - Golden Otto (6.05.2006) - Bild Osgar Awards: Music Award (6.05.2006) - Goldene Stimmgabel Awards: Best German Popband (24.09.2006) - Eins Live Krone: Best Liveact (7.12.2006) - Radio Regenbogen Awards: Pop National 2005 ( ..2006) - Sold-out-Award of Königpilsen Arena: Ausverkaufte Tourhalle (2006) - World Music Awards: Best-Selling German Act (15.11.2006) - Comet Hungary: Best Foreign Band (1.06.2006) - Comet Hungary: Best Foreign Newcomer (1.06.2006) - Hungarian Popcorn Awards : Best Newcomer International (..2006) - Hungarian Bravo Otto: Best Newcomer (..2006 - Hungarian Bravo Otto: Best Band International (..2006) - MTV France: Best Rock Band ( ..2006) - Golden Penguin: Album Of The Year - Golden Penguin: Band Of The Year - Golden Penguin: Song Of The Year - "Der Letzte Tag" (..2006) - Bayrischen Musiklöwen 2006

• 2007*

- European Border Breakers Award (21.01.2007) - BZ-Kulturpreis Awards: Rock Award (23.01.2007) - ECHO Awards: Best Video National (25.03.2007) - BRAVO Otto: Superband Rock - Golden Otto (28.04.2007) - Comet 2007 : Best Video (3.05.2007) - Comet 2007 : Best Band (3.05.2007) - Comet 2007 : Supercomet (3.05.2007) - Goldene Stimmgabel Awards: Best Band (..2007) - DMMA: Most Popular Leading Website (..2007) - Festivalbar in Italy: Digital Prize (07.09.2007) - TMF Awards Belgien: Best Pop International (13.10.07) - TMF Awards Belgien: Best New Act International (13.10.07) - TMF Awards Belgien: Best Album International (13.10.07) - TMF Awards Belgien: Best Video International (13.10.07) - MTV European Music Awards "Inter Act" (01.11.07) - Kids Choice Award Italien "Best Band International" - IFPI Platinum Europe Award 2007 für Schrei (Release 2006) award level 1

• 2008*

- Rock Björnen: Best International Act (24.1.) - NRJ Award: Beste Band/ Bestes Duo International (26.1.) - Goldene Kamera: Beste Musik National (8.2.) - ECHO: Bestes Video National "Spring Nicht" - EMMA: Best International Act - Disney Channel Kids Awards Italy - Best International Act - Dutch Hitkrant Award - Hottest Hunk (Bill) - Dutch Hitkrant Award - Best Concert - Dutch Hitkrant Award - Scariest Guy (Bill) - Dutch Hitkrant Award - Song That Stays In Your Head "Monsoon" - Dutch Hitkrant Award - Best Mood "Monsoon" - BRAVO Otto: Beste Band Rock - Silberner Otto (3.5.) - TRL Awards Italy: Best Band (17.5.) - TRL Awards Italy: Best No.1 (Monsoon)(17.5.) - Comet 2008 Bester Live Act (23.5) - Comet 2008 Beste Band (23.5) - Comet 2008 Bestes Video (23.5) - Comet 2008 Super Comet 2008 (23.5) - MTV Video Music Award "Best New Artist" (07.9) - TMF Awards Belgien: Best Male International Bill Kaulitz (11.10) - TMF Awards Belgien : Best Video International Tokio Hotel - Don't Jump (11.10) - Los Premios Awards : Song Of The Year "Monsoon" (16.10) - Los Premios Awards : Best Fanclub (Venezuela) (16.10) - Los Premios Awards : Best New Artist - International (16.10) - Los Premios Awards : Best Ringtone "Monsoon" (16.10) - MTV European Music Awards "Headliner" (06.11) - Record Russia : Best Selling DVD "Zimmer 483-Live in Europe"

• 2009*

- Jugendpreis Fernlernen 2009: Bill und Tom Kaulitz (27.04) - BRAVO Otto : Superband - Golden Otto (13.05) - TRL Awards Italy: Best TRL Artist Of The Year (16.05) - Comet 2009 : Bester Onlinestar (29.05) - Bayrischen Musiklöwen 2009 "'Exportschlager Deutschlands" (17.09) - Audi Generation Award 2009 "International" (17.09) - MTV European Music Awards "Best Group" (05.11) - Premios Telehit 2009 "Best International Rock Band" (12.11.09) - Select Live Awards 2009 "Best International Newbies" - Portrait Choice Awards - Best Dressed Male Celebrity (Bill Kaulitz) - Portrait Choice Awards - Song Of The Year "Automatic" - Portrait Choice Awards - Album Of The Year "Humanoid" - DestinoRock - Bester Fanclub

• 2010*

- NRJ Awards: International Group of the Year (23.01.) - Bravoora Award 2009 (Bravo Polen): Beste Band 2009 - Golden Penguin Awards: Best Album - "Humanoid" - Golden Penguin Awards: Beste Band - Tokio Hotel - Regenbogen Award: Band International - EMMA Finland: Best International Act —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rzorro1 (talk • contribs) 12:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Article Tom Kaulitz needs work

After being a redirect to this article for a long time, the article Tom Kaulitz has been created lately and is in a terrible state and needs to be seriously re-written. Maybe someone following this discussion wants to do so I don't. BNutzer (talk) 19:39, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Personalities

Doesn't some of the information seem a little personal? Like when it says Gustav is sulky and moody. Is this really about their personalities? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.60.208.236 (talk) 21:24, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Feel free to fix it, anyone can edit. :) I went and removed it, thanks for pointing that out. ×××BrightBlackHeaven^(talk)××× 07:33, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Pending changes

This article is one of a small number (about 100) selected for the first week of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.

The following request appears on that page:

However with only a few hours to go, comments have only been made on two of the pages.

Please update the Queue page as appropriate.

Note that I am not involved in this project any more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially.

Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 20:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC).

Genre?

I'm a reviewer and I just approved the addition of the Alternative Rock genre to Tokio Hotel's info box. I was inclined to do this mainly because this article's lead sentence introduces the band as Alt. However, in the infobox's template is a comment warning not to remove sourced genres. I wanted to check if anyone knows of a reason why they should not be listed as Alt. If this is INACCURATE, please remove the Alt reference in opening line.

ocrasaroon| ^{blah blah blah} —Preceding undated comment added 08:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC).

add please

I'll work on it.. i think the different sections of the other members all need pictures...it would look a lot better

SullySullomizer (talk) 18:05, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

New Album

It's a rumor that they will soon start working on a new album after "humanoid". Bill is to be taking trips to the studio several times. Tom was even talking about this during his interview at "Reebok" and said they would have to do double the work. Instead of 50, they would have to record 100 now, half german, and half english. Not confirmed but it's possible =). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.70.245.119 (talk) 22:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Missing DVD

I just noticed that the Leb' die Sekunde DVD is not on the list of DVDs... I know it's not THE most important thing to update, but still... Just thought it should be added onto the list since it shows footage of the boys when they were young, plus live footage of several of their songs. It was released in 2005 by Universal/Island Records. —Preceding unsigned comment added by FLPKaubee (talk • contribs) 09:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Actually the Discography section on the page only refers to CDs: Leb' die Sekunde DVD wasn't a live album (neither was Caught On Camera and that is not there for the same reason) hence it's absence.

EDIT REQUEST

They've been featured on MTV World Stage twice.

Once in September 2009, Athens, Greece, where they played new songs from Humanoid.

Once in July 2010, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, where they played mostly Humanoid songs. 77.86.70.61 (talk) 22:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

- Gold for "Durch den Monsun" Single - Germany - Platin for "Durch den Monsun" Single - Germany - Gold for "Schrei" Album - Germany - Dubleplatinum for "Schrei" Album - Germany - Gold for "Leb die Sekunde - Behind the Scenes" DVD - Germany - Dubleplatinum "Leb die Sekunde - Behind the Scenes" DVD - Germany - Gold for "Schrei" Single - Germany - Gold for "Rette Mich" Single - Germany - Gold for "Der letzte Tag" Single - Germany - Gold for "Durch den Monsun" Single - Austria - Gold for "Schrei" Album - Austria - Platinum for "Schrei" Album - Austria - Platinum for "Zimmer 483" - Austria - Platinum for "Zimmer 483" Album - Russia - Gold for "Zimmer 483" Album - Russia - Dubleplatinum for Zimmer 483 - Russia - Platinum for "Schrei" Album - Russia - Gold for "Schrei" Album - Poland - Platinum for "Schrei" Album - Poland - Gold for "Zimmer 483" - Poland - Gold for "Schrei" Album - Switzerland - Gold for "Schrei" Album - Czech - Gold for "Schrei" Album - France - Gold für "Scream" Album - Belgium - Gold für "Monsoon/Durch den Monsun" Single - Belgium - Gold for "Scream" Album - Spain - Gold for "Scream" Album - Sweden - Diamant for "Zimmer 483 - Live in Europe" DVD - France - Platin for "Scream" Album in Portugal - Gold for "Scream" Album in Greece - Gold for "Scream" Album in Romania - Dubleplatinum for "Scream" Album in Italy - Platinum for "Zimmer 483 - Live in Europe" DVD - Portugal - Gold for "Tokio Hotel TV - Caught on Camera" DVD - Portugal - Dubleplatinum for "Tokio Hotel TV - Caught on Camera" DVD - France - Gold for "Tokio Hotel TV - Caught on Camera" DVD - Italy - Gold for "Scream" - Greece - Gold for "Humanoid" - Greece - Gold for "Humanoid" - Spain - Gold for "Humanoid" - France - Gold for "Humanoid" - Italy - Gold for "Humanoid" - Portugal - Gold for "Humanoid" - Belgium - Gold for "Humanoid" - Russia - Platinum for "Humanoid" - Italy - Gold for "Humanoid" - Taiwan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.12.121.75 (talk) 16:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

That's quite some imagination you have there. --Muhandes (talk) 07:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Best Of album

The article needs to be unlocked, because Tokio Hotel will release a new album with their greatest hits called 'Best Of', along with a new track called 'Hurricanes and Suns'. You should update the page. --188.80.166.153 (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism

This article seems to be a magnet for it, so it should be watched carefully. --Limxzero (talk) 12:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

TOKIO HOTEL GENRE

"Pop rock, ". I have to say I was shocked, and kind of pissed. They are a rock band. Nothing is "teen" or "pop" in the genre of their music.

The genre I mean should stand there is ROCK. Also their new album(Humanoid) is a bit Electronic/Alternative. One of their songs is actually a bit Grunge (Humanoid).

Not pop, not teen.

Thank you for reading. Love, Yvonne Helland. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.112.211 (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

If you have sources to say that they are not a pop rock band, then we can remove it, but we shouldn't be relying on just one person's opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocker10000 (talk • contribs) 14:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Fact is Tokio Hotel is ignored by established and recognized Rock media & press, I have yet to see a single article in magazines like Sounds, Rolling Stone, Rock hard or similar that portrays the band as a rock band. Heck, I even have yet to see any article about them in any magazine of that type. The only music magazines reporting about the band are Bravo and similar, and they are undeniably specialized in pop and teenie music. These are the facts. Since we're discussing opinions here too, mine is that only Tokio Hotel fans think they are a rock band, real rebels and all. But let's face it, while they have a few decent songs and might be fun to watch, they are not really catering to a rock audience, are they? --Mister Denial (talk) 11:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

2011 Awards

Tokio Hotel won: February 2011 Best Concert of the Year on the Planeta Awards - Peru —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.176.223.193 (talk) 15:10, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Hiatus?

I am wondering has the band gone on hiatus, seeing as their most recent posted video on their youtube channel is a year and a half old and postings on their website blog and twitter doesnt seem to indicate any musical developments. OOODDD (talk) 12:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

The new album will never be released - add to article?

I found two pages in the MTV site indicating that their new album will never be released, and I was wondering if they are "encyclopedic" enough to mention in the article that they will never release the new album.

• First page: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1703661/tokio-hotel-musical-march-madness-2013.jhtml
• Second page: http://www.mtv.com/news/musical_march_madness/

The first page contains a video where Tom Kaulitz is talking about MTV's Musical March Madness. He says: "If we win, we will release our record this year, otherwise..." Bill Kaulitz concludes "Never", and the word NEVER appears, superimposed to the picture.

The second page contains the results of MTV's Musical March Madness, showing that Tokio Hotel lost to Ed Sheeran.

This indicates that, indeed, their album will never be released. Now the question is: are two pages from the MTV site encyclopedic enough to be cited in Wikipedia? I know that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, but that guideline mentions unverifiable information. This information CAN be verified. There is actually a video demonstrating what Tom and Bill said: that they will never release the new album if they don't win MTV's Musical March Madness, and a page demonstrating that they did not win. Devil Master (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

kids with tyra banks

on facebook pages by thomas tigrotto moss (who seems to be tom kaulitz of tokio hotel) he has many photos of him with tayra/tyra banks and including many indicating not 1 but several kids with her - check out to add to personal life paragraph ? hindenburga joanz sr, tayra's reel bf 69.121.221.97 (talk) 12:13, 31 August 2011 (UTC)source photos at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001679717236

That is a fake profile. "Tigrotto" is Italian for "young tiger", and all his status updates are written in Italian. Among his friends, he has one "Maryse Blasphemy" who also writes in Italian. That profile has "Firstfakeofmaryseouellet" as a nickname. "First fake of Maryse Ouellet". In turn, one of "Maryse Blasphemy"'s friends is "Llib Kaulitz", a profile full of pictures of Bill Kaulitz stating that he is "engaged to Tom M. Speechless" (another profile full of pictures of Tom Kaulitz) and has a brother named Thomas Such Mich (yet ANOTHER profile full of pictures of Tom Kaulitz). In fact, you know what? I'm reporting all of those profiles to Facebook right now for impersonating celebrities. Devil Master (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Awards

I can't help but notice that the awards section has been removed a handful of times. I agree that such edits are unproductive and do vandalize the article but they are right that including that long list of awards and recognitions does make this page much longer than it should be. Perhaps a List of awards and nominations received by Tokio Hotel page is in order?-LordMaldad2000 (talk) 04:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

They've won 110 (I counted 109 but I might've miscounted the list, either way it's a lot). I agree that a separate article is probably due. I think because they've won so many awards it does deserve to be acknowledged, that's quite a remarkable number whether you like the band or not, but it should be separate. AgainstMeAgainstYou (talk) 03:58, 26 February 2014 (UTC)