Talk:Tomáš Karpov

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


– As below per rationale at Talk:Dominik Halmoši. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support for accuracy, and per recent outcomes. --BDD (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose These marks are not needed when used in English. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:47, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These are not English people. As per MOSPN and various other guidelines, policy and actual practice, en.wp does not normally Anglicize modern Eastern-European names unless people change nationality such as Schoenberg. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:49, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per encyclopedic correctness and previous outcomes. Comment: WP:AT states that "Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources." HandsomeFella (talk) 21:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per encyclopedic accuracy. On principle, we should use the correct spellings for the names of people from non-English speaking countries, and we shouldn't even need "reliable English sources" to verify the correct spellings of foreign individuals. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: Per HandsomeFella . Skinsmoke (talk) 09:34, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per HandsomeFella and Elvenscount. And per the many reasons I have given at many of these moved requests over the years. -DJSasso (talk) 13:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom and encyclopedic accuracy. - Darwinek (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.