Talk:Tomás Martínez

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved as the current title appears to be the common name.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Tomás MartínezTomás Martínez Guerrero – To reflect the correct name of the individual who is the subject of the article. Fiddlywick (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 15 August 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved(closed by non-admin page mover) Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Tomás MartínezTomás Martínez (President of Nicaragua) – not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)Relisting. -- Dane talk 16:52, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Tomás Martínez (politician), I don't think (President of Nicaragua) is a reasonable disambiguator. Make DAB at base name.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This man was the leader of a nation state for ten years, and we're comparing him with a present-day footballer who hasn't even appeared for his national first team yet? That's pure WP:RECENTISM, and the Nicaraguan president is hands down the primary topic by the long-term significance criterion.  — Amakuru (talk) 07:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Obviously the President of a sovereign country is the primary topic, per long-term significance, when the only other article is a virtually-unknown young footballer. Neodop (talk) 16:10, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, the other subject does not yet have so much long term significance that a dab would be required here. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.