Talk:Tonawanda Reservation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Western NY

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Niagara County, New York	Erie County, New York

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

Content from Tomawanda Seneca Nation Land Claim:

Right now, the Indian Law Resource Center is appealing the court ruling on the Tonawanda Seneca Nation Land Claim case, dismissing it on cross motions for summary judgment. The Resource Center claims that the Seneca Nation was robbed of much if not all of it's historical and ancestral land in unlawful land deals with the State of New York. The appeal was filed in 2002 and when the lower courts made an unjust ruling, they refiled an appeal brief in August 2003 and debated it in court in October. The US Supreme Court said that the land that was supposedly sold without alerting Congress was in fact already in possession of the State Of New York due to the 1794 Treaty of Canandaigua. This is the not the only time such reports have been filed, in fact, there have been many others. Often the tribes get either a bad ruling from a lower court or a shoo from the Supreme Court. The Cayuga nation, the Mohawk tribe, and the Oklahoma-based Seneca-Cayuga Tribe all lost their cases over land ownership because apparently they took too long to file their claim. The current Supreme Court has been accused of being the most anti-American-Indian Supreme Court in history and has been met with complaints by many influential people.

Is it really necessary to have seperate pages for the same Indian Reservation? Alangdon86 20:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I've consolidated them all into this article. --JBC3 (talk) 22:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tonawanda Reservation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:20, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Population[edit]

As presently listed, the population totals for the reservation make no sense.

The lead paragraph states that 693 live on the reservation as of the 2010 census. The infobox shows a population of 2662 (also from the 2010 census), but also states that the population as of 2016 is ZERO. The county breakdown of the population uses both 2000 and 2010 census figures, and does not add up to any of the population totals previously mentioned.

I don't have the up-to-date data available to me, but if anyone out there does, a population update is sorely needed. 209.90.140.72 (talk) 00:49, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]