Talk:Tony Abbott

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tony Abbott article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

WARNING: Active sanctions apply to this article

This article is subject to an indefinite one revert per twenty-four hours restriction. This sanction was applied by Callanecc as an uninvolved administrator under this decision by the Arbitration Committee which authorised discretionary sanctions for this and related pages.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Sydney / Politics Top‑importance

	Australia portal Tony Abbott is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Pauline Hanson was copied or moved into Tony Abbott with this edit on 17 July 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wider shots[edit]

I've kicked off a centralised discussion here. This topic should have more visibility and wider input so we can work out a uniform policy rather than having the same debate over and over. --Pete (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Onion Incident[edit]

Will i get into any trouble for adding this somewhere?

"In March 2015 while visiting Charlton Farm Produce in northern Tasmania Abbott famously bit into a raw unpeeled onion, chewing up the piece and polarizing the nation between those disgusted and those in awe of the impressive feat."

It was definitely news worthy at the time. Netanyahuserious (talk) 10:40, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like it's been discussed in the talk archives, but I'm pretty sure how it will go if you try to add it... see WP:NOT#NEWS.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why is the infobox photo not his official portrait?[edit]

Why isn't it this? It's used in Abbott Government why can't it be used here? Ak-eater06 (talk) 19:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tony Abbott official photo.jpg

Official photo

Consensus is that what we have is a better portrait. Julia Gillard has another image by the same photographer and we are luvky to have that as well. Really good portraits of politicians and celebrities that we can actually use are very scarce. The copyright status of the official portraits isn't clear, but it seems more appropriate to use them in an article devoted to official terms, rather than an overall biographical article.

Just quietly, but official portraits are a bit hit and miss. Abbott and Rudd have particularly poor shots. --Pete (talk) 20:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is false. There is no consensus at all that we have a "better" portrait - that's just your personal opinion. The reason why the official portraits aren't in use is not because of this, but instead because of the uncertainty regarding copyright status - as I shared on the thread Ak-eater06 started on the WikiProject, there is a nomination for deletion on WikiCommons of the official images of Gillard and Abbott, where discussions were held over the status of the images (and as far as I know have yet to be resolved). It was agreed that until the copyright matter was resolved one way or the other, we would halt any and all discussion regarding the use of the image on the infobox. Thescrubbythug (talk) 11:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heading text[edit]

Can this photo of Tony Abbott be the standard photo now--~~Celco85~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celco85 (talk • contribs)

You ignored the script that someone left stating . Someone obviously left that for a reason because this has obviously been a contentious issue in the past. Now down to your image. It isn't enhanced as it changes his hair colour. TarnishedPath^talk 13:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i am sorry i was quick to change the photo can this version of the photo remain though?

--~~Celco85--Celco85 (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The adjustments you've made to lighten the photo have had the effect of lightening his hair to a different shade than it was (before he started to go grey in any case). I think that's an issue. TarnishedPath^talk 13:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I should write the adjustments that whoever touched up the photo made. TarnishedPath^talk 13:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes write adjustments--Celco85 (talk)Celco85--Celco85 (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]