This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
List George Daniel and Matthew Healy by their full names under producers per Template:Infobox song Done
The writing and production sentence should be the second one of the lead instead Done
"The song was released on" → "It was released on" Done
Remove the names of the previous singles because that is irrelevant to the article Done, also the release date is not mentioned anywhere in the body; maybe add it at the start of reception and retitle to Release and reception? Done
Writing and production credits are not written directly in the lead but are sourced from personnel; try to write out somewhere like the opening section Done
"It was written by" → "The song was written by" Done
Maybe identify Guendoline Rome Viray Gomez by his stage name of No Rome to avoid confusion, as you use that later on? Done
@Kyle Peake:He is credited by his legal name. I'm not overly familiar with the WP policy for legal (vs stage) names, but I can change it if you feel it's appropriate.Giacobbetalk 13:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe:I could understand this if it was the only mention of him in the lead, but he is later mentioned by his stage name of No Rome so to avoid confusion for readers, you should either list him as that initially since songwriting credits list musicians under their real names, or use the real name initially but put "who has the stage name of No Rome" afterwards. --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe: Okay, no worries! I honestly didn't know haha (most of the articles I write are from the 1975, and they write/produce all their songs without stage names), but that makes sense! Giacobbetalk 16:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"was handled by former two." → "was handled by the former two." Done
"The song's beat originated from" → "The beat originated from" Done
"during "Narcissist" (2018), the band's" → "during the recording of "Narcissist", the band's" to be specific; also, release years for songs are not notable for the lead Done
Remove wikilink on No Rome Done
It is not sourced in the body that they continued working on the beat with No Rome Done
Remove "achieved moderate success on worldwide music charts" since such language is not suitable for the lead; merge the previous parts of that sentence with the one about the UK/Scotland Done
Ireland position should come before the US one because the former is a main chart Done
Add the word chart after Billboard Hot Rock & Alternative Songs Done
@(CA)Giacobbe:The former, as you should not have commas after the studio album term in the body like the lead style. --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The year-end and decade rankings are not sourced Done
"considered by various publications" → "while being considered by various publications"
Removed the "decade" part and reworded, not sure if this is still applicable. Giacobbetalk 14:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is fine and so is the source! --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe mention in the A Brief Inquiry into Online Relationships sentence that the album includes "TooTimeTooTimeTooTime"? Done
Annie Mac should be italicised per the article Done
"condensing it into a" → "condensing the track into a" Done
[13] should be solely at the end of the para because it backs up all of the last three sentences entirely Done
"saying it didn't" → "saying it does not" since this is talking about the song itself, so use correct tense Done
"and be enjoyable." → "and be enjoyable like he considers music to be "about at some point"." per source Done
Should I includes Stroud's first name, as he is mentioned in the preceding section? Giacobbetalk 14:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe: No, I must have missed that sorry; only list by his forename in this section. --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fix MOS:QUOTE issues throughout this section
@Kyle Peake: I think I've fixed the issues. I'm admittedly not very good with understanding the different ways to properly reference quotes on WP. If you could just give this a once over, that'd be much appreciated! Giacobbetalk 16:34, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The Ringer should not be italicised Done
Mention the groove in comp too since that's notable Done
"on the album's core theme; relationships" → "on the album's core theme of relationships" Done
"calling it: "their" → "calling it "their" Done
"trends into the groups" → "trends into the 1975's" Done
Again, should No Rome be listed under his real name?
Credits list him by his legal name, can change if you'd prefer but source does not list him as "No Rome". Giacobbetalk 14:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
He is not listed for producer or anything else that would be confusing not to put his stage name for, so keep as real name... this was more of a query. --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, no worries! Same here. I have no idea what the guidelines for this are, haha. Giacobbetalk 16:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sony/ATV Music Publishing → Musicnotes.com on ref 19 Done
Ref 30's archive does not work, so change to a different one Done
Are you sure about ref 35's reliability per my earlier comment?
Yes. As per my comments above. Giacobbetalk 15:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cite The Ringer as publisher instead for ref 36 Done
You are supposed to cite artist parameter instead of date for ref 45 Done
Sorry, adding/deleting refs has gotten me confused? Which ref is this referring to?Giacobbetalk 15:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(CA)GiacobbeThe one for the Ireland chart position. Also, I have only left comments where they are needed; good luck! --K. Peake 15:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I did not put reliable sources as y or n since I am not sure either way about ref 35. --K. Peake 11:47, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kyle Peake: I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. Thank you for another amazing review (and the first one for ABIIOR!). Please let me know if there's anything I've missed :) Giacobbetalk 16:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe: Looks good, apart from the one QWQ issue with "at the same time."" in the reception section; it is not a full sentence so the full-stop should be after speech marks. --K. Peake 17:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@(CA)Giacobbe:✓Pass now, they were two more issues that had arisen but they were not ones that had been gone over here so I fixed them myself. Congrats on scoring a GA during the backlog drive!!! --K. Peake 18:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, buddy! Always a pleasure!! Giacobbetalk 18:04, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]