Talk:Total Politics

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

This is a valid description of a new British political magazine, for which there is no reason for deletion.

Well actually there is. The article fails to indicate why this magazine is notable. It will also need reliable sources to verify notability. Please discuss at the Afd page here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Politics – ukexpat (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for expansion[edit]

These were all revealed in a simply search, please remember that afds should only be submitted after an exhaustive search for sources.

--neon white talk 21:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know that and I did search. I have no idea why none of these showed up. Afd withdrawn. – ukexpat (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling error maybe? The article needs a complete rewrite in my opinion. I dont have time now, so i'm hoping someone else will start. --neon white talk 21:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Style issues[edit]

A few style issues i'm not sure about. Should the entities mentioned in the first paragraph (MPs, MEPs, peers, members of the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland assemblies, and councillors) be wikilinked or would that be overkill? Is there an infobox for magazines? --neon white talk 15:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

found the infobox. Can we use an image of the cover? where do we stand on fair use copyright? --neon white talk 15:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Email the publishers. I'm sure they'll be delighted to give you permission to use an image. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]