Talk:Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen – The Album

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Future album[edit]

The film shouldn't have any articles about the album until the album released .

Regards, World Cinema Writer (talkcontributions) 06:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? There are articles about upcoming albums on Wikipedia all the time. Jerkov (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've two objection. The first one is the album haven't even released. Secondly, the album has no enough sources and references. World Cinema Writer (talkcontributions) 15:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of sources is grounds for improvement and an "unref" tag, not deletion. I've already mentioned why it not having been released yet isn't a very strong argument. I'll see if I can find a reference for the track listing. Jerkov (talk) 15:17, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should we make a table for the track listing, like on the Wiki page for the first soundtrack?[edit]

Basically, it helps provide information about where the songs are in the film. Just like the Wiki on the first soundtrack simply.--989 RVD (talk) 07:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I heartily agree! There are a couple "extra" tracks that were heard in the film, but are not listed in the album. 173.66.220.210 (talk) 18:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

such as what exactly? =o-o=--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talkcontribs) 19:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Check the Wiki for the first Transformers album.--989 RVD (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confused...[edit]

"I'm So Excited" by the Pointer Sisters has an asterisk next to it, denoting that it was not used in the film. If the song is neither on the soundtrack nor was it used in the film, then why exactly is it listed at all? --158.65.162.119 (talk) 00:44, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The American band singular[edit]

I realize that BrE (etc) and AmE differ on this point, but hasn't something gone badly wrong in "Seether was to supply their song [...]"? They've changed their grammatical number from singular to plural in the space of two intervening words? Surely either "were to supply their", or "was to supply its", for the love of all that's subject agreement. Smartiger (talk) 19:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linkin Park[edit]

Please read the talk page of TF1 OST!