This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Transhumanist Party' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles
Maintenance / Etc
Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
The article makes a big deal about the Transhumanist Party "participating" in the presidential elections of 2016 and 2020, but conspicuously fails to mention that their candidates were never on the ballot in a single state. Istvan apparently had write-in access in two states and received fewer than 100 votes; Kam doesn't appear to have had even write-in access, making it questionable whether he was genuinely a candidate at all. Especially with its heavy reliance on primary sources, the article currently smacks of wikipuffery. What is the relevance of the results of the party's presidential primary, when they effectively sat out the whole election? Jah77 (talk) 14:46, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
