Talk:Trespass in English law/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Overall summary[edit]
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A wide-ranging, well-referenced article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- No images
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- No images.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. There are quite a lot of red links, but as the links are there I assume that that means that an article will be produced at a later date. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 10:36, 3 April 2010 (UTC)