Talk:Tri-ang Railways

Trains: in UK / Transport modelling Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Rail transport modelling task force.

Toys Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Need for inline citations[edit]

I notice that there have been a few edits since May 2021 when the requirement for inline citations was added.

I can look through my copy of Pat Hammond's Vol1 book, but I think it would help if other editors could also assist.

I notice that all but one of the External links have been removed. The stated reason is WP:EL which seems to have been correctly applied. But why is 'Tri-ang Model Railways' left? WP:EL should require its removal also.

As the 'bot' has returned to this Article, I think it would be useful to consider improvements soon rather than have the Article considered for deletion by Wikipedia.

I consider Tri-ang Railways to be notable and that this Article should remain. Do others agree?

Not being in UK, I do not have easy access to newspapers. There must have been news items about Tri-ang to Tri-ang Hornby for instance.

Railway Modeller (RM) reported new items, but as RM rarely viewed an item that they did not approve, some care is necessary. Constructor was always more balanced, but I have only a few copies.

I tried a search on Companies House but those online records are too recent. BlueWren0123 (talk) 11:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An additional question: There does seem to be a gap on Wikipedia as the Tri-ang Hornby period has no Article. can this Article be extended to include that period?BlueWren0123 (talk) 04:07, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's Hornby Railways#Tri-ang Hornby: 1964–1972. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I had seen that but the change in name from Tri-ang to Tri-ang Hornby did not make a substantial change in the type of items. For example Super-4 continued (and was slightly extended), coaching stock continued. Lima was active, but Airfix had not entered the ready to run (1976), and much the same for Mainline. The change from producing robust, but visually basic models, to models that were better detailed had not yet happened. N scale was starting to change the market options available.

Is one short paragraph enough for about 8 years when Tri-ang Hornby was a major OO supplier? BlueWren0123 (talk) 11:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consider revert the removal of a Category[edit]

'Category:Manufacturing companies established in 1950' included G & R Wrenn, later part of Lines I think. BlueWren0123 (talk) 12:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]