Talk:TuxOnIce

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 November 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This redirect is supported by Free and open-source software.

Currently in the process of being merged?[edit]

I was under the impression that it's currently unlikely to ever be merged into the kernel. According to kerneltrap, Nigel currently has no intention of getting the patches merged into the vanilla kernel. John Reed Riley 01:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From the kerneltrap article, it's clear Nigel won't be working on merging suspend2 but the kernel documentation (/Documentation/power/swsusp.txt) of the latest kernel series still mentions that swsusp will eventually be replaced with suspend2! bandan 03:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Now if only either of them would work on my laptop. John Reed Riley 05:02, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unclear forking info[edit]

The first two sentences of the article are unclear about what was forked from what. Pavel got "it" merged -- what is "it"? Is swsusp/suspend2 the main branch or the fork? Please could someone kindly correct this?

Sorry. 'It' is the out-of-tree swsusp codebase as it was at the time. Fixed now. NigelCunningham (talk) 04:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

non encyclopedic[edit]

The sentence "At the present, Nigel is busy with other tasks and is not focussing on getting the code merged" is not encyclopedic. What is the present? Please could someone change it to "As of <year>", or somesuch. 77.98.6.200

Also, I think it's particularly bad that we refer to the main developers by the first name instead of their last name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.72.128.229 (talk) 18:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]