Talk:UC Davis School of Medicine

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of California Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is within the scope of the UC Davis task force. New members are always welcome!

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

NIH funding[edit]

Whoever changed the NIH funding, stop screwing around. Chyu83 03:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmative Action lawsuit[edit]

I'll put it to those interested in editing this article, but considering the importance of Regents of UC v. Bakke in American constitutional jurisprudence, shouldn't it get at least a brief mention in the article on the school that was the center of the landmark case? I was thinking something to the effect of: "The school gained national attention when an applicant challenged the school's affirmative action admissions policy. The Supreme Court of the United States, in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), ruled that the applicant had unconstitutionally been denied admission." Just a thought. Bruin03 05:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - I'll add it into the article. Pyrofork 18:35, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matriculation[edit]

It is very unclear the way you have it worded ("about half matriculate"). That would make the acceptance rate even lower. Please clarify -- until then it will be left at the regular, calculated rate.Pyrofork (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UC Davis School of Medicine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100612194411/http://aamc.org/students/applying/msar.htm to http://www.aamc.org/students/applying/msar.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]