Talk:UFC 109

Hughes/Gracie[edit]

That bout really shouldn't be added yet. In the new ref that has just been added ([[1]]) it even says "However, MMAjunkie.com could not immediately confirm that the Hughes vs. Gracie matchup is close to finalized." Until it's finalized it shouldn't be added. (pinchet (talk) 16:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I wholeheartedly agree. Sadly, I keep having to remove it. The other bouts are confirmed by outside sources. These same outside sources are only saying that this is rumoured. Once Gracie signs a deal with UFC, then it will be suggested that this is signed. Until then, it's going to continue to be deleted considering that wikipedia is no place for rumours. Paralympiakos (talk) 16:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is correct. However, I just noticed that there is no source that confirms Matt Hughes to be fighting on this card (only rumours/targeted to return in early 2010) so I have removed him until a source can confirm his participation.(Justinsane15 (talk))

[[2]] "Renzo: ‘What do they think I’m made of?’ Gracie denies Hughes fight is in February, but confirms return is near." I think this settles it. (pinchet (talk) 03:53, 13 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Fair enough. I'm happy with Hughes being removed. Should hopefully stop the rumours for a while. Paralympiakos (talk) 06:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Issac Santos vs. Matt Hughes[edit]

Who put this up their, it should be hughes and gracie.9c.m1994 ({User talk:C.m1994|talk]]) 07:14, 30 November 2009 (EST))

The history of the page will usually tell you who's vandalising it.(Justinsane15 (talk) 00:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Pic[edit]

The picture should be taken away because the Nogueira/Vera fight has been taken off the card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trunks8719 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nogueira Injured[edit]

{{editsemiprotected}} the UFC 109 page says Rogerio Noguiera is out with staph infection. This is not the case. He is out because of an ankle injury. No staph infection El Wendigo (talk) 17:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Welcome and thanks for wanting to improve the accuracy of that article. Could you provide a reliable source for your information? Thanks, Celestra (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the source article for that line there is no mention of staph, but it can't even confirm that his ankle was injured. "Nogueira, the brother of former UFC interim heavyweight champion Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira, suffered a fractured ankle, said both sources. Nogueira’s manager, Ed Soares, could not be initially reached to confirm the injury." We should probably just say he was injured and leave it at that. No mention of what type of injury. (pinchet (talk) 15:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

{{editsemiprotected}} Here are several articles concerning little nog's ankle injury. It is apparently well documented and therefore should be listed specifically as such, an ankle injury. No sense in withholding well known information

http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=10305&zoneid=2

http://mmablips.dailyradar.com/story/injury-moves-to-ufc-109-antonio-rogerio-nogueira-out/

http://mmajunkie.com/news/17230/little-nog-out-of-ufc-109-brandon-vera-vs-jon-jones-targeted-for-march-31.mma El Wendigo (talk) 17:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was just quoting the source linked. I'll replace it with one of the ones you've linked so that the information in the article matches the source. (pinchet (talk) 18:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I didn't see you already had, thanks! (pinchet (talk) 19:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

UFC 112[edit]

«Dana White also announced that the winner of the Nate Marquardt and Chael Sonnen fight would receive a title shot against the winner of the Silva/Belfort fight at UFC 112» But it was Silva/Maia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.32.154.9 (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on UFC 109. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100131161642/http://www.mmaweekly.com:80/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=10613&zoneid=13 to http://www.mmaweekly.com/absolutenm/templates/dailynews.asp?articleid=10613&zoneid=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]