Talk:UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Gaziev

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mixed martial arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mixed martial arts concepts, events, and biographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mixed martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Mixed martial artsmixed martial arts articles

Saudi Arabia Low‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

STOP REMOVING PEDRO AND PICKETT RETIREMENT MENTION.[edit]

If you mention the retirements on the individual wiki pages for each fighter, it therefore deserves to be mentioned on the wiki card page too.

I updated the card page again with RELIABLE, NON-SOCIAL MEDIA sources about the retirements.

If you're going to mention the retirements on the individual fighter pages, why can't the retirements be mentioned on the card wiki page too? It's completely RIDICULOUS to remove this objective information. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned in your talk page, not all sourced content is inclusive - see WP:ONUS but only relevant and significant to the event. Fighters retired all the time after their fights so it is not significant in the event page. we do mention such retirement in the fighters' page which both fighters Tyson Pedro and Jamie Pickett articles. Cassiopeia talk 03:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source mentioning retirements of both Pickett and Pedro[edit]

Are you saying mmanews.com is not a reliable source?[edit]

Is that why you removed the FACTUAL INFORMATION about Pedro and Pickett retiring on that card? Is it because you take issue with mmanews.com?

The other source I mentioned there was mmafighting.com, which is referenced multiple other times in the article, so I'm assuming you don't take issue with that source, correct?

So, theoretically: if instead I find sources on mmafighting.com about Pedro and Pickett retiring on that card, and exclude mmanews.com, you won't remove this information again. Is that correct? 24.212.225.184 (talk) 04:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

mmafighting.com is clearly a "reliable source" if it's sourced multiple other times in the article.

Here is information on mmafighting.com about Pedro retiring: https://www.mmafighting.com/2024/3/3/24088855/tyson-pedro-announces-retirement-jokes-financial-difficulties-probably-going-to-have-to-rob-someone

Here is information on mmafighting.com about Pickett retiring: https://www.mmafighting.com/2024/3/3/24088828/jamie-pickett-retires-following-5th-straight-ufc-loss-i-got-kids-who-count-on-me

So, now that I have provided a RELIABLE source for both of these fighters retiring on that card, can you reinstate my edit, please?

Thank you. 24.212.225.184 (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]