This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@Redrose64: Sensibly, they have chosen not to edit war over that article so protection doesn't seem to be needed. Thryduulf (talk) 11:15, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That one needs to be moved back and if necessary protected too. Problem is the system won't allow the move back to the correct title. Tony May (talk) 14:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tony May: I already explained this. Since a double move was used to get it to the present name, it needs to be reverted as a double move. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:03, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tony May: Given that the change in title is obviously not uncontroversial you need to get consensus for it first. Thryduulf (talk) 22:26, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]