This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ullaasam article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

Poor choice of sources[edit]

From what I know, the movie was poorly directed even though it had a good storyline, but it was not a "financial failure" as mentioned by the Editors here. In fact the sound track and BGM was a bigger hit than the movie itself and is considered as one among Karthik Raja's best works. I remember, people went to watch this movie particularly for its songs and BGM. Another fact is that, Ajith Kumar was more popular than Vikram at that time and so more weightage was given to Ajith Kumar. The Editor has intentionally used poor sources to edit this article. As of now, there are very few reviews of this movie over the internet and hence it is not possible to quote reliable sources. Naturally, crooked Editors will stand to benefit from this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.117.198.164 (talk) 14:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]