Talk:Ultimate Requiem
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ultimate Requiem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) on 6 December 2023. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Deletion[edit]
Could you please not delete the page. all thats needs to be added is a plot for each issue. Anyone can help. thank you.
"All his cells were destroyed..."[edit]
Does it really state this? That "all Wolverine's cells were destroyed," despite them having his entire arm (thus, millions of cells)? It may well say this, as I know the writing on this and the Ultimatum series itself was atrocious and infantile, but that's pushing things.
Just running a fact check, since I did not in fact read that issue. 214.3.138.234 (talk) 12:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Steve
Proposal to remove template messages[edit]
The template message stating that the article "describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style" was added when the article was only a stub with 2 sentences. That is no longer the case, since the lead section of this article, for instance, refers to the publication history of the comic books series, not only to events that happened in the series.
The other template message, which states that the article "relies too much on references to primary sources," may not haven taken into account that "a primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge." An example which applies to this case is that "an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source." Since this article interprets neither the plot nor the events that occur in the series, using primary sources to describe the plot and events isn't a problem.
Toitsuteki Aru Mono (talk) 18:27, 7 May 2022 (UTC)