Talk:Unified Code Count

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2023. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This page was proposed for deletion by Jfire (talk · contribs) on 15 January 2023.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This redirect is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

I want UCC to show line-in change for logical add, del, mod.

Is there any possibility for finding the changed position in files for logical mod,add,del.

future changes[edit]

The statement " The US Government has made UCC its standard for code counting" seems like an exaggeration. In any event, it needs to be supported by an appropriate reference; otherwise it should be removed.

CodeCount originated in the 1990s I believe. It was certainly around then. The author seems unaware of this history. I don't know enough about it to make the edits. Hope someone is willing. 840anchor (talk) 16:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of biased-sounding bits in this article ("esteemed" really jumped out at me). However, I'm hesitant to go through and remove them lest I make it worse than it started. I'm also not really sure which template should be used in this case, on the main article. Hopefully, someone with more Wikipedia experience can at least add a template to the page to make sure it gets cleaned up some. -- Lewellyn ^talk 20:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest deletion/shortening?[edit]

At least at a glance this read like an add, wordings is all "buzzwordy" boasting on questionable metrics like "lines of code directly representing productivity". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.187.2 (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing links[edit]

There are broken links in the section describing the documentation (Release Notes, User's Manual, and Code Counting Standards). These should be fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeLski (talk • contribs) 14:27, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:222nd Broadcast Operations Detachment (BOD) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:50, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]