Talk:United Kingdom agency worker law

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law B‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common Law NPOV[edit]

Are the references to Tony Blair strictly necessary?

He's a barrister. Barristers in England are required by law to accept instructions in any case they are competent to argue. Had he not acted in the cases concerned he could have been disciplined for professional misconduct.

217.43.47.32 (talk) 00:39, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Nethermere is a formative case, and while the cab-rank rule is certainly there, don't you think that it is important to understand why his government worked against introducing protective legislation? It's not much of a coincidence that the same work he did for his pupil master, Derry Irvine, was the same work he did as PM and Irvine passed cases on as LC. Wik idea 16:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But looking at it again, you were a bit right, and I've removed the sentences which are more journalistic than factual. Wik idea 16:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on United Kingdom agency worker law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]