Talk:Varso

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Vandalism"?[edit]

The user JKlamo is again and again rolling back any correction of the buildings height in a European context, citing "vandalism" as a reason. But it cannot be that the Varso building should be listed on other terms and standards than any other high rise in Europe. However if it is true that the definitions have changed on Wikipedia then please cite a source so that we can start changing the articles for every other high-rise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigmdata (talk • contribs) 08:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but insisting on undiscussed changes breaking consensus and enforcing these changes using revert wars is exemplary vandalism.Jklamo (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then stop doing so! Your edits are breaking Wikipedia-wide consensus on how building heights are counted. Bigmdata (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there is Wikipedia-wide consensus on how building heights - use CTBUH, see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Skyscrapers/Archive_5#Reliable_resources?. I repeat the warning, stop revert wars! Jklamo (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spire or antenna mast?[edit]

The 80 m structure going up from the roof of the building is described as a spire or antenna mast alternately. Which is it? Antenna masts don't count for purposes of the list of building heights. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See the thread above. Considered as spire per CTBUH (as well as Emporis), which is pretty convincing.--Jklamo (talk) 08:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]