Talk:Veeram (2014 film)/Archive 1

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

I need to edit the line "the movie received mixed reviews" in reception part. I need to edit that line as "the movie received positive reviews" as the movie is doing overall good, negative reviews cannot be allowed, so I am placing this request. Please change mixed reviews to positive reviews because the ratings are good for this movie. Ajenth (talk) 09:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: The reviews include 2.5/5 and 2.75/5 so are mixed and not positive. Arjayay (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

While reading the page veeram 2014(movie),I found that some one has edited that page by giving wrong information.Actually this movie has been running successfully all over Tamil nadu,but the guy vigneshvijay (seems to be a vijay fan) who edited this page made it against the Ajith and his fans.So,please follow it. Sankardon (talk) 09:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: The reviews include 2.5/5 and 2.75/5 so are mixed and not positive. Arjayay (talk) 12:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

While reading the page veeram 2014(movie),I found that some one has edited that page by giving wrong information.Actually this movie has been running successfully all over Tamil nadu,but the guy vigneshvijay (seems to be a vijay fan) who edited this page made it against the Ajith and his fans.So,please follow it. Sankardon (talk) 09:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: The reviews include 2.5/5 and 2.75/5 so are mixed and not positive. Arjayay (talk) 12:57, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

Copy of entire article, pasted here, removed Rsidd1111 (talk) 13:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: I have removed your repeat of the entire article.

If you wish to make a request, do this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", so it is clear what you want added.
Furthermore, you will need to cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information can be added to this article. - Arjayay (talk) 13:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

Please replace mostly positive reviews in the critical reception section since there are ratings of 2.75 etc are there from various sources with an apropriate word. Again nd again some people are changing it. Please take some action on those who is changing it giving false news. Rsidd1111 (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. I've reverted (again) that modification to the article. --ElHef (Meep?) 00:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

This movie has received positive to mixed reviews under all scenarios. Your reference in the reception section says it all but you are still writing "highly positive"? Wikipedia is supposed to give genuine reports, not exaggerated ones. Change it 120.59.9.147 (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

I'm putting up this request for the third time but still no change has been made. It is written as highly positive reviews which should ne replaced apropriately as positive to mixed since there are less ratings also present in the sources given in the summary and reception section. Kindly make a note of it and change it accordingly. I think this page should be blocked for further changes after u change it. Rsidd1111 (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Agreed and fixed, thank you. The film is recently released so information may change quickly. It's best not to block/protect the page completely to allow updates. But the good news is your account is now confirmed and you will be able to edit this page. Thanks --PeaceNT (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2014

Please update the BOX OFFICE Collection 122.183.245.194 (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: You have made no edit request in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", so it is unclear what you want added.
Furthermore, you have not cited any reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to any article. - Arjayay (talk) 19:30, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 23 January 2014

Please modify the first line of Reception because the film received mostly positive reviews from general audience as well as Ajith fans. Also, the following lines are confusing: "the film received mostly positive reviews from critics upon release" and under Reception paragraph "The film received moderate reviews from critics." Those two lines are contradictory. Thanks 182.72.36.254 (talk) 12:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Veerudokkade

Veerudokkade seems to be dubbed version only. Not a remake or even parts shot, hence suitable sources may be provided to contest this merge. Thanks. βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 05:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, the Telugu dubbed version should simply be redirected to the original as per the thousands of other dubbed films on Wikipedia -_-. Editor 2050 (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

• Support – It has become a trend that's catching up with newbies who create articles on dubbed versions. —Vensatry _(Ping) 17:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iol.co.za/tonight/movies/movie-review-veeram-1.1633621#.UuloZdJdWog. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 20:48, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 January 2015

Veeram Grossed Only 69 Crore Not 130 Crore 117.193.28.175 (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

We need reliable source(s) for this change. Materialscientist (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2015

Please Change the Box office collection of the movie from 70 Crores to 130 crores. http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101 Cnellai (talk) 01:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Done Altamel (talk) 04:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 4 June 2015

veerambox office - 80 crores http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101 Jnandhakumar96 (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Done Altamel (talk) 04:36, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 October 2015

Veeram Box Office : 83.5 crores (as per IMDB)

Chellan Nimesh (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Not done: imdb content is user generated and therefore not a WP:RS Cannolis (talk) 11:57, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

need correction veeram overall box office best source forbes and ibi times http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101 http://www.ibtimes.co.in/vijays-kaththi-ajiths-veeram-top-grossing-tamil-films-2014-618958 Ezhil1992 (talk) 19:10, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Done EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

dont let anyone to edit this boxoffice collection until you get source better than forbes. as per forbes collection 130 crores..lot of anti ajith fans in social network they can't edit forbes thats why they edit wikipedia and creating fake reports.. http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101

1.23.18.132 (talk) 19:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No edit request made. Removing request template. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

thanks for the edit 130c http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101 1.23.18.132 (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

No request made. Removing request template. Also, you're welcome. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

veeram 1300 c

1.23.18.132 (talk) 19:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

veeram collection 130 crores

1.23.18.132 (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Already done EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2016

veeram over all boxoffice

http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/vijays-kaththi-ajiths-veeram-top-grossing-tamil-films-2014-618958

Ezhil1992 (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. clpo13_(talk) 18:54, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2016

veeram 130 c http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/ajith-kumar/101 Ezhil1992 (talk) 13:49, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. clpo13_(talk) 18:55, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 July 2016

182.75.9.171 (talk) 05:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

veeram 130crore boxoffice fake

there is no official confirmation to 130crore collection report.official reports confirms only 100crore club entry.Please enter only official confirmed reports by officials. Athulnandu (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Needs reliable sources to back that up. See WP:RS. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2016

Veeram Lifetime Box Collection is 84 Crores not 130 crores because Film released along with another big-ticket film Jilla starring Vijay and Mohanlal which affected its Tamil Nadu Market, In Kerala, Veeram didn't saw proper light due to Drishyam Storm and Mohanlal factor in Jilla put into losses, same fate happened in Telugu market as film released along with Telugu Superstar Mahesh Babu 1: Nenokakdine and Ram Charan's Yevadu and overseas has been shadowed by Both telugu films and Drishyam result into Average Hit. It is impossible for Ajith Kumar's Veeram to break into 100 Crore around such big circumstances. Even Ajith Kumar Recent hit Vedalam total collection is Rs. 120 Crores despite no big releases except Thoongavanam and being Diwali Release.

203.123.134.194 ([[User talk:203.123.134.194