Talk:Velvet Revolver/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Swarm ^X 14:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Greetings. I'll conduct the good article review for this nomination. I know it's long overdue; I'll have the review completed by today and hopefully it won't prove difficult to promote. A preliminary scan looks good, so bear with me and I'll get the review up ASAP. Regards, Swarm ^X 14:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Criteria check

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Wow, that's a lot of references.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Should have something along the lines of a 'musical style' section. Here's a good example of a short one. Nothing major.

    Done. Hope that is good enough? HrZ (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Looks like the article's well monitored as well.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images free.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Other than 3a, everything looks good. Swarm ^X 21:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your comments! I added a Musical style section here. I hope that is sufficient enough and correct, admittedly I'm not the best at writing those type of sections. HrZ (talk) 13:51, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Alright, good. At least now the article doesn't neglect the topic. It's passed my review is now listed as a good article. Swarm ^X 18:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)