Talk:Veterans for a Strong America
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Veterans for a Strong America article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Additional sources[edit]
- http://www.salon.com/2015/09/16/rachel_maddow_reveals_donald_trumps_sketchy_fundraising_ties_to_a_nonexistent_veterans_group/
- http://www.ksfy.com/home/headlines/Arends-responds-to-Veterans-for-a-Strong-America-allegations-328140381.html
- http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2015/09/17/vet-group-that-endorsed-trump-lost-tax-exempt-status-months-ago/
- http://www.argusleader.com/story/news/2015/09/18/vets-organization-head-says-trump-event-legal/72411716/
- Cwobeel (talk) 04:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Plus:
- http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/arizona/politics/2015/07/23/arizona-clean-elections-dark-money-investigation/30544091/
- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/29/benghazi-arizona-governor-primary_n_5413569.html ("Veterans for a Strong America has a history of bombastic advertisements linked to outlandish plans and fundraising appeals. In 2012, the group ran an ad -- also produced by Noble's DC London -- claiming President Barack Obama took undue credit for the killing of Osama Bin Laden, insulting Navy SEALs involved in the mission. Arends declared that the 'swift boating' of the president had begun. The effort fizzled and Veterans for a Strong America spent only $750,000 on direct attack ads against Obama.")
- Neutralitytalk 06:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)