Talk:Viavi Solutions

Missing sources[edit]

I marked a few sentences that were missing sources. The info was covered in press releases but I don't like using primary sources. I tried to source the Xgig with this: http://www.cbronline.com/news/telecoms/network/jdsu_to_acquire_network_tools_business_from_finisar_100709/, but it's apparently on a banned list of sources.Timtempleton (talk) 05:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tone[edit]

This is mainly a problem with the products section. It is close being advertorial. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 14:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frayae - it's hard to describe a technology company's products for laymen without being overly verbose, but almost everything is sourced and I took pains to keep the language as neutral as possible. A second set of eyes is always welcome - feel free to cull anything you think has been written in too promotional a tone, or if it's easier, you can point out here what concerns you and I can rewrite the offending text. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did some copyediting and removed the tag. Overall it's neutral enough. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 08:20, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frayae Looks better - thanks for doing this. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 November 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Viavi Solutions → VIAVI Solutions – On behalf of Shaycw. Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~I strongly oppose this per WP:MOSCAPS. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 16:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)~~ Blocked sockpuppet. ―Mandruss ☎ 03:44, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WP:CAPS In ictu oculi (talk) 22:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as unnecessary. Regardless of policy, their own most recent 10-K uses Viavi. [[1]] I added a phrase about the stylization info to the lede, which should suffice, since the name is already all caps throughout the entire article. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 04:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.