Talk:Virgin Active

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Blatant advertising/ corporate page, needs editing - not encylopedia material. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.231.92 (talk) 15:01, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

Agree! Has Wikipedia has been bought out by Richard Branson and rebranded Virgin Pedia? Am I expecting to see articles like "ARPANET - world's first packet switched network that ultimately led to Virgin Broadband", "Exercise - healthy pursuit for human beings to engage in, particularily at Virgin Active", "Orville+Wilbur Wright - pioneers of powered flight, a technology that has reached its zenith with Virgin Atlantic"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.58.70.79 (talk) 10:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've had a go at improving the page but, frankly, the previous two comments are not at all constructive. What would you expect to see in the article? Longwayround (talk) 13:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virgin Active Logo.png Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Virgin Active Logo.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weird image at the top of the page[edit]

I'm not sure how to go about removing it but I assume the huge photo of the back of a guy's head isn't supposed to be there... 2A00:23C6:5E02:BA00:34F8:3CDC:ECB7:2308 (talk) 19:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's gone now. Thank you for pointing this out! —C.Fred (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]