Talk:Vishwaroopam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 14 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved - Havelock Jones argues persuasively that WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is governing in this case. Style guides are of course important but they do not over-ride a guideline that rests ultimately on WP:NPOV via WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC) FOARP (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


– While by the pageviews, this article is the most viewed, MOS:FILM asks to disambiguate films with the same name with year — DaxServer (talk to me) 18:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Update: added soundtrack to RM 16:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC))
  • support all per nom. Also: when I hear "Vishwaroopam", the first thing that comes to mind is Vishvarupa, not the film. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook(talk) 17:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This is the same misunderstanding as here. WP:PRIMARYFILM applies; to the extent that MOS:FILM contradicts WP:NCF, the latter should take precedence as a naming convention (to which MOS:FILM cross refers). As for usernamekiran, WP:NWFCTM applies. Havelock Jones (talk) 12:07, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.