Jump to content

Talk:Vitamin D (Glee)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article... there're few problematic areas :) So, first up:

  • In the Production section; this sentence is too awkwardly long "Recurring cast members who appear in "Vitamin D" are Naya Rivera, Heather Morris, Harry Shum, Jr. and Dijon Talton as glee club members Santana Lopez, Brittany, Mike Chang and Matt Rutherford, Stephen Tobolowsky as former glee club director Sandy Ryerson, Iqbal Theba as Principal Figgins, Patrick Gallagher as football coach Ken Tanaka, Kent Avenido as Terri's co-worker Howard Bamboo, and Bill A. Jones and Earlene Davis as local news anchors Rod Remington and Andrea Carmichael." Maybe change wording to "Recurring characters...", then do a "character (actor)" thing so we don't feel shuffled.
  • Also, the caption for File:Lea Michele 2009.jpg, reading "Michele practiced speaking "manically" for several days in order to convey the effects of pseudoephedrine on Rachel." Clarify and add some set-up for drive by readers, so they know blatantly "for this ep the actress L.M. practiced ..yada ..yada on her character, Rachel". (lol.. she looks like she's at 'manic practice' in the picture!) Rcej (Robert) - talk 08:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review! I've changed both parts per your suggestions - that sentence really was awkwardly convoluted, haha. Thanks again :) Frickative 16:09, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good... and since everything checks out, it looks like we're ready! Nice working with you, albeit briefly :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 09:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Results of review[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Vitamin D (Glee) passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass