Talk:Von Kries coefficient law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Von Kries Who?[edit]

Should there not be a link somewhere? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_von_Kries Da5nsy (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Typo?[edit]

"Therefore, if one of the three cones are less stimulated than the others, the sensitivity is proportionally reduced." This is unclear at best, and straight wrong at worst. Da5nsy (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

Haven't read it (yet) but I believe below is the location of a translation of Von Kries' work. Anyone able to confirm? Sources of Color Science - D MacAdam https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Sources_of_color_science.html?id=VihOAQAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y Da5nsy (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not Current or most widely used[edit]

"...widely used law to quantify color adaptation" this is not true. The current standard is the Modified Bradford method. The CIE defines Bradford for transform into CIE L*a*b* as well as in CIECAM2000. The ICC specifies Bradford and as such it is the default method used in the CMMs of both Windows and Mac OS X. The brad ford method can be found here. http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?Eqn_ChromAdapt.html Really this article should be renamed "Chromatic Adaption and the 3 major methods should be all in the same place Linear, Von Kries and Bradford. see the site above. --IlluminantD (talk) 17:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]