Talk:W. Grant McMurray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

President Emeritus[edit]

Is McMrray considered "President Emeritus" like his two predecessors?--ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 17:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What were those "inappropriate choices"?[edit]

I don't get it - if a major public figure resigns and cites his own "inappropriate choices" as a reason, isn't it legitimate to ask what those choices were? In his case, though, everyone seems to agree that it's not anybody's business. It's almost a conspiracy of silence... I wonder whether someone will remove this section from the Talk page. 68.9.178.66 (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is more likely that there hasn't been an individual look at this who was motivated enough to find the reliable sources that would be needed to properly document this kind of thing in a biography of a living person. If you can do that, feel free. Also, please mind WP:CONSPIRACY. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
208.81.184.4 is correct, there isn't a "conspiracy of silence". There is simply no reliable sources that say anything but what he wrote in his letter, i.e. "inappropriate choices". If you find a source, by all means, add it.ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 21:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
However, I agree that it's odd that no newspapers dug into it. If Thomas S. Monson stepped down for "inappropriate choices" the news would have been all over it. I guess it's just a much smaller sect, so no one cared.ARTEST4ECHO (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on W. Grant McMurray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]