Talk:WCHS-TV

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: West Virginia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	West Virginia portal This article is supported by WikiProject West Virginia (assessed as Low-importance).

Conservative slant[edit]

Like many of the Sinclair-owned stations, this channel's news has a bit of a conservative slant in its reporting. How can this be mentioned in a npov manner? Youngamerican 03:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Concrete examples might work. The Sinclair Broadcast Group page says that Sinclair runs conservative editorial segments called "The Point" on all its stations; that it prepares pre-packaged news segments for all its stations to use; and that it prevented WCHS from airing Nightline's tribute to the troops killed in Iraq. Are these true for WCHS? (I grew up in the viewing area, but haven't seen its newscasts for years.) Malepheasant 06:30, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
They sure did. The Mark Hyman editorials run on the news, they did not show the Nightline episode in question, and some of their recent reports have made Fox News Channel look like CNN. I'll try to scrounge up some citations. Youngamerican 13:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Citation[edit]

I believe his statement: "There is overwhelming evidence that Glencairn/Cunningham is merely a shell corporation used by Sinclair to circumvent FCC ownership rules." probably requires citation or adjustment, perhaps at the beginning of the statement, i.e. "There have been many suggestions that..." or "Some have asserted that there is overwhelming..."Joemann —Preceding undated comment added 16:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]