Talk:WOLO-TV

United States: Television / South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

An official ABC owned station?[edit]

Is ABC Columbia trying to become an official ABC owned station? King Shadeed 19:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notable Former Staff Section[edit]

I noticed that there is disagreement about what to include in that section. In this case, Deconstructthis's position is the one that has current community consensus and, more importantly, is consistent with policy. I see that the IP mentioned on D's talk page that "I work there," but, of course, Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all information--personal experience is never acceptable verification. Below, I'll cut and paste the full explanation I'm using when I make similar deletions (I'm extremely slowly working my way through the NBC stations to remove unsourced, potentially non-notable "former staff"):

I just cut everyone out of the alumni section that does not have their own Wikipedia page or have a reference to establish their notability. This is the current consensus procedure, based on discussions at WP:WikiProject Television Stations and at the Village Pump. The rationales are as follows:

Most importantly, per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
Secondarily, per WP:V, we cannot include information that is not verifiable and sourced. I'm not certain how it would even be possible to source this information.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

All of the people with their own pages are notable enough to appear on this list. However, if you look at pages about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of info, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher).

So please do not continue to try to add unsourced information. If you have a source that 1) verifies the person worked there and 2) is notable enough for inclusion, then you can re-add the info. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]