Talk:WRKO

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Miscellaneous[edit]

"The station today has experienced years of steady decline in its audience. Most observers trace the decline to its emphysis on extreme right-wing politics that is out of step with the population of the Greater Boston area." I, personally, would agree with this. But this is an opinion that is not often brought up. You fail to mention 'FM Talk' 96.9 WTKK signing on in 1999 coinciding with the decline of WRKO. The decline of AM radio in general. Also, the reliance of too many syndicated shows instead of local origination (this wold include the first three hours of the Howie Carr drivetime program).

I removed this line. It's clearly POV stuff. MPWard 05:32, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SaveWRKO.com[edit]

Why isn't SaveWRKO.com included in the external links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.124.163.174 (talk • contribs)

It's a blog, and therefore not a neutral point-of-view. - Dudesleeper · Talk 01:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WRKO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061105093140/http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/03/host.fired.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/03/host.fired.ap/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

request edit[edit]

In your primary posting on WRKO, it says: "WRKO is Boston's second most powerful station. A 50,000-watt class B station, it provides . . . "

If I'm not mistaken, 50,000 watts is the maximum allowable power for a legal/FCC licensed AM station in the United States which means no other AM station could be more powerful. (There might be an FM station in the market with more power but power in FM is not nearly so important (for coverage) as antenna height whereas power in AM is nearly "everything" and comparing AM and FM stations [by power] is like "apples and oranges.")

Please check on this.

Cheers!

Charlie Roberts cr@exit109.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlie1761 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Power output is not necessary in the lede. I rewrote the introductory paragraph to identify it as a Class B AM station. Nathan Obral (talk) 04:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]