Talk:WWE Judgment Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deleted "Khali became the first wrestler to beat the Undertaker cleanly." He isn't even the first person to beat him cleanly this year, as Kurt Angle did so at NWO '06. Mr. Papaya 01:58, 9 June 2006

but for some resion the comontators made it sound controvsal but it was a clean victory sailor cuteness-ready for love 23:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Angle vs Henry match came before the king of the ring final, i have it on DVD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.157.132 (talk • contribs)

No it didn't, the KOTR final aired before Angle/Henry. They probably just changed the order on te DVD (which has been done before).

Will they ever stop?[edit]

The reason I took a wiki-break was because I was tired of people vandalizing articles. 3 months later people are still doing it. I happen to know a administrator (my cousin) and I'm going to try to put a pre-empt block on the next couple of PPV's. -- Kings bibby win 19:30, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Hey guys, I would like to request this page to be protected from unregistered or new users due to some recent vandalism that may continue if it isn't stopped. I had to delete some vandalism on the 2007 WWE Judgment Day line-up. Ultra123 02:27, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right now it's just one IP, so the request would just be turned down. Do what I do, just revert it and use the Template:Test boxes (I gave him the Test 2). If he does it again, Level 3, then Level 4 (the final warning, after that, report him). TJ Spyke 02:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

poster[edit]

I checked aroud but couldnt find this years poster because they have already released one night stand i figure they would of already released judgement day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.114.108 (talk • contribs)

The poster that's up now is disputed, it might not be the genuine/final version. For one, it doesn't have the brand logos on it. Illuminattile 17:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's from WWE's official affiliates website: [1]. It may not be the final version, but it is the current one. TJ Spyke 22:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matches at Judgement Day[edit]

they may have another Batista v Undertaker match, this may be a buried alive match or a hell in a cell. shouldn't you put up kane v tba because he is on the poster and it is likely he will have a match at the ppv. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.50.132.247 (talk) 01:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No, we don't put up any matches unless they are announced by WWE (and then the announcment had to be aired in the US or on wwe.com). TJ Spyke 01:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey, they just announced a match on Raw, it's Bobby Lashley vs. Mr. McMahon(C), Umaga, and Shane McMahon in a 3-on-1 Handicap Match for the ECW World Championship.....again. ::sigh:: anyway, can you add it? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.61.119 (talk • contribs)

It's already been added. TJ Spyke 01:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is any one thinking since Edge beat Undertaker for the world championship, that it may be Edge vs Undertaker (vs Batista)? Dro Boy May 10, 2007 20:02
No, since 'Taker is injured. Koberulz 16:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey, question to anybody. its not about a match though. if i want to update my user page, how do i get those little boxes that say like ""this user is a fan of WWE, or this user enjoys the Simpsons etc..." how do i do that. I know how to just explain myself in words, but have no idea how to do those boxes, please explain about the user boxes. it would be much appreciated. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perkowitz1 (talk • contribs)

This isn't the place to ask this, but I will answer anyways. Go to Wikipedia:Userboxes. At the bottom of the page, they have tons of categories for you to browse through, the page also explains how you can create your own. TJ Spyke 21:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know this wasn't the place, but i couldn't find any other place to. Thanks though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perkowitz1 (talk • contribs)

poster[edit]

hey i found a other promo poster but i don't know if its real or not so i didnt add it but it has kane on top of the world but the world is like in a smackdown shape and taker is on another planet shaped like wwe

so i think its fake but it looks mad and really graphical so yh judt dayin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.113.122 (talk • contribs)

The current poster comes straight from WWE. So yeah, that other one is probably fake. BTW, I know it doesn't matter but maybe you should use capitalization and punctuation. TJ Spyke 21:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What? Not Again.[edit]

Hey someone put at the very bottom of judgement day 2007 U.S. Championship Antonio Banks vs [[Chris Benoit. do we even know if its gonna take place at judgement day cause I checked wwe.com and it dosent say anything about that match.

Thanks for taking it out. we'll just see if that match is going to take place at judgement day so i'll be seeing wwe shows to find out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.251.251 (talk • contribs)

Yeah, no matches have been announced for Judgment Day yet. TJ Spyke 22:46, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for saying that TJ Spyke but look at the very very end the hardy vs lance cade and trevor murdoch in a tlc for the world tag team champinship somebodys vandilising this page so can somebody PLEASE put protection on this page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.251.251 (talk • contribs)

I gave the IP a warning. From past experience though, the article won't be protected at this momement since it's just 1 IP. If that IP keeps it up, he will be blocked. TJ Spyke 22:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok im really getting angry that a person keeps on adding matches like now they put john cena vs great kahli for the wwe title so the person doing this should be blocked.SORRY for the message I wrote earlier i just saw in PWMania.com of a spoiler between cena and kahli for the wwe title so can they really put it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.251.251 (talk • contribs)

If this keeps up, I will ask for the article to be protected. This is ridiculous, every WWE PPV for the last 8+ months has ended up getting semi-protected thanks to vandalism. You probably already guessed it, but matches are only considered official if they are announced on WWE TV or wwe.com. TJ Spyke 23:58, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is jd 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.225.113.127 (talk • contribs)

A vandal removed it. I have restored it and warned the IP. TJ Spyke 07:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers[edit]

I found this site that shows what some of the PPV matches will be- http://www.prowrestling.com/article/news/4193 Maybe we should add these matches to the article. These ppvs should probably be locked so idiots cant change it, especially if people are going to cite it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.167.200.173 (talk • contribs)

That site cited THIS site as a source. No matches have been announced on WWE.com or WWE TV, so no matches should be listed yet. I deleted the matches that were listed.Mr. Papaya 15:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, it was sortof a joke, but it goes to show that allowing anyone to add matches can lead to these kind of things, and so we should probably semi-protect the page from unregistered users like me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.167.200.173 (talk • contribs)

The page has been semi-protected (meaning that IPs, and accounts less than 4 days old, will not be able to edit it) until May 21. TJ Spyke 21:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find the irony of the first message of this section quite funny. Koberulz 17:55, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

new matches[edit]

two likely matches for judgement day are edge v batista and kane v mark henry. wiki shuld add these to get the jump on rival websites. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.31.181.218 (talk) 12:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This isn't a dedicated wrestling website, or a place to post spoilers. This is an encyclopedia, so what "rival websites" would you be referring too? Wikipedia, as an encyclopedia, does not add anything that's "likely". We only add confirmed matches on WWE Television Programming or WWE.com Bmg916SpeakSign 17:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Been along time since I've been on Wikipedia. Took a long wiki-brak. Anyways BMG is right, are their any real rival websites to Wiipedia. Well, excxept for spin-offs like Answers.com. -- Kings bibby win 19:25, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Theme Song[edit]

The following is from wwe.com:

Special thanks to Ozzy Osbourne for "I Don't Wanna Stop," the official theme song of Judgment Day. His new album, Black Rain, will be available May 22 on Epic Records.

The official song listed in the article is "Slap" by Ludacris. 24.89.69.22 15:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was vandalism, it has been fixed. TJ Spyke 21:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carlito vs Flair or Michaels vs. Orton?[edit]

I watched Raw and the Ric Flair vs Carlito match was mentionned during the Carlito-Venis match by JR and King. Orton vs Michaels should be after the Flair vs Carlito because it was annouced first. 205.151.6.33 17:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orton vs. Michaels is now listed after Flair vs. Carlito since that is the order they were announced, you are correct. Bmg916SpeakSign 17:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Raw has not been screened in UK so this should not have been added yet. UK viewers are not allowed to add any spoiler information from Smackdown - as this appears earlier than in US. So the same should apply for Raw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.23.136 (talk • contribs)

Since WWE is a US based company, we go by when the info is first announced in the US (which WWE does too, they already added in on their website). TJ Spyke 21:39, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This doesnt matter since it looks like everything has been resolved, but RAW is on live the same time in the UK as it is in the US (if you dont count the 30 seconds difference so Sky Sports can bleep out any swearing etc) Don.-.J 19:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies - both very good points. Thanks for clearing that up.88.110.23.136

Should we say anything about the...[edit]

fact that Kane appeared on the poster of the PPV but didn't wrestled on the show? I think that could count for a trivia secition of the WWE Judgment Day 2007 show. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NWo4lifePT (talk • contribs)

No. TJ Spyke 04:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we add that Shawn Michaels got taken to the hospital with some woman (probably his wife) at JD 2007?Urena198 11:01, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been just a storyline, so I don't think so. TJ Spyke 00:30, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it was definately kayfabe. No reason to add it. The Kane fact is interesting, but again, not notable enough for Wikipedia. You can surmise that info from simply reading the article anyway. Gavyn Sykes 03:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was his wife, and the concussion angle was kayfabed to cover his knee surgery, that will leave him out until Survivor Series. Or so says the internet, at least. Koberulz 08:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We should all be wary of internet rumors/"news". Just last week there were "reports" that Rob Van Dam had been released from WWE. TJ Spyke 10:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2003[edit]

the battle royal had a more contraversal finish johnnycash316 (talk · contribs)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Tw2N_I8asU

2003 Six-Man tag[edit]

You have got to be kidding me! Palumbo clearly got the pin in that match, but because one source recorded the results incorrectly, we can't say that? Mshake3 (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Even the most reliable source makes mistakes. However, the only source provided so far that says otherwise is not acceptable since Wikipedia is quite clear that sources that violate the law (like knowingly hosting video that violates copyright laws, which is why YouTube is not allowed as a source for WWE/WCW/ECW/AWA/WCCW content). TJ Spyke 02:27, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My source is the DVD. And that's a reliable source. Mshake3 (talk) 02:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's all gravy. Lets move along, shall we? :) — Save_Us † 02:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mshake, your source was a website that was illegally hosting copyrighted material. Thankfully Save Us 229 found 2 RELIABLE sources. Was there a point in taing this to WP:PW to complain about illegal video not being allowed? TJ Spyke 02:42, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
THE VIDEO IS NOT THE GODDAMN SOURCE!!!! It's merely a way to show what actually happened. The source is the broadcast. Got it? Mshake3 (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I already answered at WP:PW, but suffice it to say that I was right and you were wrong. An illegally hosted copyrighted video would never be allowed as a source, but you are lucky in that Save Us actually provided a reliable source. So let's end this now. TJ Spyke 02:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How many times does he have to say that the video was not the source? Gavyn Sykes (talk) 03:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the edit on my page, he only posted a link to the site. He seemed to change his mind after I point out that his source was not acceptable under Wikipedia standards. He was citing the video. Again, the fact that he was wrong is moot now. So let's end this. 03:05, 7 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ Spyke (talk • contribs)

You're still missing the fucking point. Instead of looking at a video just to see who actually did what, you completely ignore it for being "illegal", and continue to point to an inaccurate web source. In the future, I hope you stop being a policy-whore (or is it wikilobbying?) and use some common sense. Mshake3 (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So making sure articles follow guidelines and policies is a bad idea? Haha. I suggest in the future you find a reliable source like Save Us 22 did, rather than pointint out a source you know will not be allowed. TJ Spyke 15:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop being so fucking anal about things, like it's your fucking site or something. It really pisses me off that you revert things JUST so it makes you feel better. TheHeartbreakKid15 (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, making sure articles actually follow the policies and guidelines and that we don't advertise sites blatantly violating copyright laws makes me feel good. This is like hearing someone cheat on a test and then hearing them complain when they get caught. I was in the right here and I couldn't care less about people who disagree. TJ Spyke 00:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Judgement Day 2010[edit]

Giving you a Heads up on the ANOTHER Name Change with WWE.

http://www.wrestleview.com/news2009/1255294330.php?style=dark

ForrestdFuller (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2009 (EST)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WWE Judgment Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:WWE_Judgment_Day&oldid=1206089547"