Talk:WWE Tribute to the Troops

	WWE Tribute to the Troops is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Cena vs. Jericho[edit]

It's obvious Cena won.--Curtis23 (talk) 02:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates[edit]

Shouldn't the dates be added to when the shows were taped?

2012[edit]

I know that this isn't a discussion forum, but I was just wondering... In 2012 all the troops will return to The United States. So would the Tribute to the Troops stop than? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.239.239 (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think by then there will probably be another global wrong-doer to smite MrZoolook (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010 table is messed up[edit]

I have tried twice to edit it, both times the preview was fine, but my edits were not saved to the page. If people really must copy and paste an old table to make life easier in creating a 2nd one... they might consider emptying the old data before saving the changes... MrZoolook (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Split off results to its own article[edit]

Hi there. I would like to propose that the results section be split off to its own list article titled List of WWE Tribute to the Troops results. The reason I propose this is that the results section is getting too long to be contained in the main article and, IMO, needs it's own article dedicated to the results as the event shows no sign of stopping after this year's event. CRRays Head90 | ^#RaysUp 22:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. The results are the most significant part of a wrestling show. They're what happened. It'd be odd to omit something so fundamental from a main article. Doesn't look particularly long to me. Two swipes on the trackpad gets me to the bottom. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - indeed it is getting long and it's just a click away even when moved, Hulk. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 23:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A click away in an article which suggests the results had notability independent of the events where they occured. If that were true, it wouldn't be right to also mention the main events in the body here, further shrinking this small article. Money in the Bank ladder match is more of what I'd call "long". InedibleHulk (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - 10+ years and the results are long enough for this article to exist. Stephen"Zap" (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per above. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, we just move content to another article and begin to repeat content across the two articles with nothing new added. What is the point of that? MPJ -US 20:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]